Randomized clinical trial of peer integrated collaborative care intervention after physical injury.

IF 2.2 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-01-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001657
Douglas F Zatzick, Eileen M Bulger, Peter Thomas, Allison Engstrom, Matt Iles-Shih, Joan Russo, Jin Wang, Jake Shoyer, Cristina Conde, Khadija Abu, Navneet Birk, Lawrence Palinkas, Patrick Heagerty, Lauren K Whiteside, Paige Ryan, Tanya Knutzen, Ronald Maier
{"title":"Randomized clinical trial of peer integrated collaborative care intervention after physical injury.","authors":"Douglas F Zatzick, Eileen M Bulger, Peter Thomas, Allison Engstrom, Matt Iles-Shih, Joan Russo, Jin Wang, Jake Shoyer, Cristina Conde, Khadija Abu, Navneet Birk, Lawrence Palinkas, Patrick Heagerty, Lauren K Whiteside, Paige Ryan, Tanya Knutzen, Ronald Maier","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of the current study was to assess the effectiveness of a peer integrated collaborative care intervention for postinjury outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Injury survivors ≥18 years of age were screened for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and severe postinjury concerns; screen-positive patients were randomized to the intervention versus enhanced usual care control conditions. The collaborative care intervention included peer support and care management. The intervention also included evidence-based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapeutic elements targeting PTSD. The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted recruitment between March and June 2020; in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the peer component of the intervention went from in-person to virtual delivery. The primary outcomes were PTSD symptoms assessed with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition PTSD checklist, any severe postinjury concerns, and emergency department/inpatient utilization followed over the 12 months postinjury. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with emotional healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 450 patients were randomized to the intervention (n=225) and control (n=225) conditions; 124 patients (28%) were recruited and completed all study assessments prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, while 326 patients (72%) were recruited after and/or had one or more study follow-ups occur postpandemic onset. Mixed model regression revealed no statistically significant comparisons for any of the primary outcomes. In exploratory models that examined the impact of COVID-19, significantly improved PTSD symptoms were present at 3 months pre-COVID-19 relative to post-COVID-19. Intervention patients consistently demonstrated higher satisfaction with emotional aspects of healthcare (F(5,1652)=2.87, p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention demonstrated no significant improvements in primary outcomes in the intent-to-treat sample. The peer integrated collaborative care intervention contributed to higher patient satisfaction with the emotional aspects of healthcare.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03569878.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"e001657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of the current study was to assess the effectiveness of a peer integrated collaborative care intervention for postinjury outcomes.

Methods: Injury survivors ≥18 years of age were screened for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and severe postinjury concerns; screen-positive patients were randomized to the intervention versus enhanced usual care control conditions. The collaborative care intervention included peer support and care management. The intervention also included evidence-based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapeutic elements targeting PTSD. The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted recruitment between March and June 2020; in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the peer component of the intervention went from in-person to virtual delivery. The primary outcomes were PTSD symptoms assessed with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition PTSD checklist, any severe postinjury concerns, and emergency department/inpatient utilization followed over the 12 months postinjury. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with emotional healthcare.

Results: A total of 450 patients were randomized to the intervention (n=225) and control (n=225) conditions; 124 patients (28%) were recruited and completed all study assessments prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, while 326 patients (72%) were recruited after and/or had one or more study follow-ups occur postpandemic onset. Mixed model regression revealed no statistically significant comparisons for any of the primary outcomes. In exploratory models that examined the impact of COVID-19, significantly improved PTSD symptoms were present at 3 months pre-COVID-19 relative to post-COVID-19. Intervention patients consistently demonstrated higher satisfaction with emotional aspects of healthcare (F(5,1652)=2.87, p=0.01).

Conclusions: The intervention demonstrated no significant improvements in primary outcomes in the intent-to-treat sample. The peer integrated collaborative care intervention contributed to higher patient satisfaction with the emotional aspects of healthcare.

Level of evidence: Level II, randomized clinical trial.

Trial registration number: NCT03569878.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肢体损伤后同伴综合协作护理干预的随机临床试验。
目的:当前研究的目的是评估同伴综合协作护理干预对损伤后结果的有效性。方法:对年龄≥18岁的损伤幸存者进行创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状和严重损伤后担忧的筛查;筛查阳性患者随机分为干预组和强化常规护理对照组。协作式护理干预包括同伴支持和护理管理。干预还包括循证药物治疗和针对PTSD的心理治疗元素。2019冠状病毒病大流行中断了2020年3月至6月的招聘;为应对COVID-19大流行,干预措施的对等部分从面对面交付改为虚拟交付。主要结局是用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版PTSD检查表评估PTSD症状、任何严重的损伤后问题以及损伤后12个月的急诊科/住院使用率。次要结局包括患者对情绪保健的满意度。结果:共有450例患者被随机分为干预组(n=225)和对照组(n=225);124名患者(28%)在COVID-19大流行发病前招募并完成了所有研究评估,而326名患者(72%)在大流行发病后招募和/或进行了一次或多次研究随访。混合模型回归显示,任何主要结果的比较都没有统计学意义。在检验COVID-19影响的探索性模型中,与COVID-19后相比,在COVID-19前3个月,PTSD症状显着改善。干预患者对医疗保健情绪方面的满意度持续较高(F(5,1652)=2.87, p=0.01)。结论:在意向治疗样本中,干预显示没有显著改善主要结局。同伴综合协作护理干预有助于提高患者对医疗保健情感方面的满意度。证据等级:II级,随机临床试验。试验注册号:NCT03569878。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perforated ulcer: patient education series understanding trauma and emergency surgery conditions. Rapid prediction of cerebral edema on CT scan after traumatic brain injury. Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Care: A Point-Counterpoint Analysis. Maintaining longevity and fulfillment in academic surgery. Strategies for improving rural trauma health systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1