SAFE-GOALS: a protocol for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit.

IF 2.2 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-01-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001663
David Ray Velez, Thomas Dresser Irons, Anthony Brando Opimo, Emily Brown, Doug Foley, Jamie Lynn Velez, Allison G McNickle
{"title":"SAFE-GOALS: a protocol for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit.","authors":"David Ray Velez, Thomas Dresser Irons, Anthony Brando Opimo, Emily Brown, Doug Foley, Jamie Lynn Velez, Allison G McNickle","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In critical care, there is often a lack of understanding regarding patient preferences toward end-of-life care. Goals of care discussions are poorly defined and inhibited by clinician apprehension, prognostic uncertainty, and discomfort from both sides. In the delivery of bad news, protocol-based discussions have proven beneficial, yet no such protocol exists for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit (ICU). We therefore assembled a multidisciplinary team to define a specific protocol dedicated to leading goals of care discussions in the ICU setting.</p><p><strong>Safe-goals protocol: </strong>S: set upA: acknowledgmentF: family understandingE: events of hospital courseG: get to know the patientO: optionsAL: active listening and discussionS: steps going forward.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This protocol provides a framework for leading goals of care conversations in the ICU. Specific training should be incorporated and better emphasized in the modern medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"e001663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary:

Introduction: In critical care, there is often a lack of understanding regarding patient preferences toward end-of-life care. Goals of care discussions are poorly defined and inhibited by clinician apprehension, prognostic uncertainty, and discomfort from both sides. In the delivery of bad news, protocol-based discussions have proven beneficial, yet no such protocol exists for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit (ICU). We therefore assembled a multidisciplinary team to define a specific protocol dedicated to leading goals of care discussions in the ICU setting.

Safe-goals protocol: S: set upA: acknowledgmentF: family understandingE: events of hospital courseG: get to know the patientO: optionsAL: active listening and discussionS: steps going forward.

Conclusion: This protocol provides a framework for leading goals of care conversations in the ICU. Specific training should be incorporated and better emphasized in the modern medical education.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全目标:在重症监护病房讨论护理目标的协议。
摘要:引言:在重症监护中,通常缺乏对患者临终关怀偏好的理解。由于临床医生的忧虑、预后的不确定性和双方的不适,护理讨论的目标定义不明确。在传递坏消息时,基于协议的讨论已被证明是有益的,但在重症监护病房(ICU)中,没有这样的协议存在。因此,我们组建了一个多学科团队来定义一个特定的协议,致力于ICU环境中护理讨论的主要目标。安全目标协议:S:设置a:确认f:家庭理解;g:了解患者;n:可选;S:积极倾听和讨论;下一步的步骤。结论:本协议为ICU护理对话的主要目标提供了一个框架。在现代医学教育中,应纳入并加强对专业人才的培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
War against superbugs, stopping them before they stop us: a biological warfare approach to safeguard European biosecurity. Emergency preservation and resuscitation in exsanguination cardiac arrest: science fiction to future reality? Perforated ulcer: patient education series understanding trauma and emergency surgery conditions. Rapid prediction of cerebral edema on CT scan after traumatic brain injury. Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Care: A Point-Counterpoint Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1