Parallel Chart Writing and Resilience Impact the Narrative Competence of Medical Staff in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70388
Yun Xu, Hongkai Guo, Guomei Ge, Jing Shu, Li Liu, Qi Jin, Junjun Jia
{"title":"Parallel Chart Writing and Resilience Impact the Narrative Competence of Medical Staff in China: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Yun Xu,&nbsp;Hongkai Guo,&nbsp;Guomei Ge,&nbsp;Jing Shu,&nbsp;Li Liu,&nbsp;Qi Jin,&nbsp;Junjun Jia","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Narrative competence is essential for good communication between medical staff and patients. It is a powerful instrument for the delivery of holistic healthcare. However, little research focuses on the influencing factors of narrative competence and the relationships among resilience, self-efficacy, and narrative competence. The study aims to explore the influence factors of narrative competence of medical staff and confirm the relationships among self-efficacy, resilience, and narrative competence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 606 medical staff from two affiliated hospitals in Zhejiang and Heilongjiang provinces, respectively. The participants were scored using the Chinese narrative competence scale, the brief Chinese version of the resilience scale, and the Chinese version of the self-efficacy scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This study showed that the score of narrative competence was 149.76 ± 28.70, including the scores of listening dimension (48.01 ± 9.36), understanding dimension (67.75 ± 13.55), and reflecting dimension (34.00 ± 6.77). A high narrative competence score was associated with hospital location and parallel chart writing (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Pearson's correlation analysis showed resilience and self-efficacy were positively related to narrative competence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Medical staff's narrative competence is intermediate in China. Parallel chart writing and resilience would impact this competence, which should be further improved.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Narrative competence is essential for good communication between medical staff and patients. It is a powerful instrument for the delivery of holistic healthcare. However, little research focuses on the influencing factors of narrative competence and the relationships among resilience, self-efficacy, and narrative competence. The study aims to explore the influence factors of narrative competence of medical staff and confirm the relationships among self-efficacy, resilience, and narrative competence.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 606 medical staff from two affiliated hospitals in Zhejiang and Heilongjiang provinces, respectively. The participants were scored using the Chinese narrative competence scale, the brief Chinese version of the resilience scale, and the Chinese version of the self-efficacy scale.

Results

This study showed that the score of narrative competence was 149.76 ± 28.70, including the scores of listening dimension (48.01 ± 9.36), understanding dimension (67.75 ± 13.55), and reflecting dimension (34.00 ± 6.77). A high narrative competence score was associated with hospital location and parallel chart writing (p < 0.01). Pearson's correlation analysis showed resilience and self-efficacy were positively related to narrative competence.

Conclusion

Medical staff's narrative competence is intermediate in China. Parallel chart writing and resilience would impact this competence, which should be further improved.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平行图表写作与心理弹性对医务人员叙事能力的影响:一项横断面研究
背景与目的:叙述能力是医护人员与患者良好沟通的必要条件。它是提供整体医疗保健的有力工具。然而,关于叙事能力的影响因素以及心理弹性、自我效能感与叙事能力之间关系的研究却很少。本研究旨在探讨医护人员叙事能力的影响因素,确认自我效能感、心理弹性与叙事能力之间的关系。方法:采用横断面调查法对浙江和黑龙江两所附属医院606名医务人员进行调查。采用中文叙述能力量表、简易中文版弹性量表和中文版自我效能量表对被试进行评分。结果:学生叙事能力得分为149.76±28.70分,其中听力维度得分为48.01±9.36分,理解维度得分为67.75±13.55分,反思维度得分为34.00±6.77分。较高的叙述能力得分与医院位置和平行表书写相关(p结论:中国医务人员的叙述能力处于中等水平。并行图表写作和弹性将影响这种能力,这应该进一步提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Corrective Exercises and Respiratory Biofeedback on the Kyphosis Angle and Electrical Activity of Trapezius Muscles in Male Adolescents With Kyphosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Association Between the WHO Package of Essential Non-Communicable Disease Interventions and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes in Palestine: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. Comparison of the Efficacy of Q-Switched Versus Long-Pulsed Fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Active Facial Acne: A Pilot, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Split-Face Study. The Impact of Chemical Toxicants and Air Pollutants on Neurodegenerative Disorders and Their Underlying Potential Mechanisms: A Literature Review. The Economic Burden of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1