Can Hearing Aids Improve Physical Activity in Adults with Hearing Loss? A Feasibility Study.

IF 1.8 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Audiology Research Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.3390/audiolres15010005
Maria V Goodwin, Katelynn Slade, Andrew P Kingsnorth, Emily Urry, David W Maidment
{"title":"Can Hearing Aids Improve Physical Activity in Adults with Hearing Loss? A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Maria V Goodwin, Katelynn Slade, Andrew P Kingsnorth, Emily Urry, David W Maidment","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Adults with hearing loss demonstrate poorer overall health outcomes (e.g., physical health, cognitive functioning and wellbeing) and lower levels of physical activity/function compared to those without hearing loss. Hearing aids have the potential to improve cognitive and wellbeing factors, but there is a dearth of evidence on their impact on physical health outcomes. Evidence on the association between hearing aid provision and physical activity is mostly limited to cross-sectional studies. This research aimed to assess whether a study can be performed to identify whether the provision of hearing aids can improve physical activity. <b>Methods</b>: This study employed a preregistered observational (prospective cohort) study design of ten older adults (51-75 years) completed assessments at baseline and again at a six-week follow-up. The participants wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X) without feedback for the full duration of the study. Feasibility was determined using pre-defined criteria, including study drop-out, adherence to accelerometer use and willingness. A battery of health outcomes was also assessed at baseline and follow-up. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, this study was perceived favourably, with all participants reporting that they enjoyed taking part. Participant retention was 100%, and adherence to the wrist-worn accelerometers was \"good\" (70%). However, recruitment was challenging, and some participants found the accelerometers to be burdensome. Descriptive statistics for all outcome measures showed non-significant changes in the expected direction (e.g., improved physical activity, cognition and wellbeing). Although the study was well received by participants, modifications to the recruitment strategy and activity tracking procedures are necessary before future large-scale trials assessing the effectiveness of hearing aids on physical activity can be undertaken.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Adults with hearing loss demonstrate poorer overall health outcomes (e.g., physical health, cognitive functioning and wellbeing) and lower levels of physical activity/function compared to those without hearing loss. Hearing aids have the potential to improve cognitive and wellbeing factors, but there is a dearth of evidence on their impact on physical health outcomes. Evidence on the association between hearing aid provision and physical activity is mostly limited to cross-sectional studies. This research aimed to assess whether a study can be performed to identify whether the provision of hearing aids can improve physical activity. Methods: This study employed a preregistered observational (prospective cohort) study design of ten older adults (51-75 years) completed assessments at baseline and again at a six-week follow-up. The participants wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X) without feedback for the full duration of the study. Feasibility was determined using pre-defined criteria, including study drop-out, adherence to accelerometer use and willingness. A battery of health outcomes was also assessed at baseline and follow-up. Conclusions: Overall, this study was perceived favourably, with all participants reporting that they enjoyed taking part. Participant retention was 100%, and adherence to the wrist-worn accelerometers was "good" (70%). However, recruitment was challenging, and some participants found the accelerometers to be burdensome. Descriptive statistics for all outcome measures showed non-significant changes in the expected direction (e.g., improved physical activity, cognition and wellbeing). Although the study was well received by participants, modifications to the recruitment strategy and activity tracking procedures are necessary before future large-scale trials assessing the effectiveness of hearing aids on physical activity can be undertaken.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助听器能改善成人听力损失患者的身体活动吗?可行性研究。
背景/目的:与没有听力损失的成年人相比,听力损失的成年人表现出较差的整体健康结果(例如,身体健康、认知功能和福祉),身体活动/功能水平较低。助听器有可能改善认知和健康因素,但缺乏证据表明它们对身体健康结果的影响。关于助听器提供和身体活动之间关系的证据大多局限于横断面研究。这项研究旨在评估是否可以进行一项研究来确定助听器的提供是否可以改善身体活动。方法:本研究采用预先注册的观察性(前瞻性队列)研究设计,对10名老年人(51-75岁)在基线和6周随访时完成评估。在整个研究过程中,参与者佩戴一个没有反馈的加速度计(ActiGraph GT9X)。使用预先定义的标准确定可行性,包括研究退出,坚持使用加速度计和意愿。还在基线和随访时评估了一系列健康结果。结论:总的来说,这项研究被认为是有利的,所有的参与者都报告说他们喜欢参加。参与者的保留率为100%,腕带加速度计的依从性“良好”(70%)。然而,招聘是具有挑战性的,一些参与者发现加速度计是负担。所有结果测量的描述性统计显示,在预期方向上没有显著变化(例如,改善身体活动、认知和健康)。虽然这项研究受到了参与者的好评,但在未来进行大规模试验评估助听器对身体活动的有效性之前,有必要修改招募策略和活动跟踪程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Comparing Slim Straight and Slim Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays for Cochlear Implantation: Hearing Results and Risks-A Systematic Review (2015-2025). Patient's Satisfaction with Hearing Aids: The Italian Version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA-It). The Effect of Modulation Enhancement Scheme on Speech Recognition in Spatial Noise Among Young Adults with Normal Hearing. The Effect of Age on Sentence Recognition in Noise with Different Noises Across the Adult Lifespan. Self-Perceived Hearing Handicap and Audiometric Severity in Age-Related Hearing Loss: Associations with Age and Sex.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1