Is living close to a drug treatment centre associated with stigma?

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104707
Xavier Bartoll-Roca, Maria Gabriela Barbaglia, Elisa Puigdomènech, Catrina Clotas, Montse Bartroli, Katherine Pérez
{"title":"Is living close to a drug treatment centre associated with stigma?","authors":"Xavier Bartoll-Roca, Maria Gabriela Barbaglia, Elisa Puigdomènech, Catrina Clotas, Montse Bartroli, Katherine Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple studies have documented stigma towards people who use drugs, but a less well studied aspect of stigmatisation is the phenomenon known as \"not in my backyard,\" The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between living near a drug treatment centre and the degree of perceived public stigma, as well as to identify differences among sociodemographic profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the Barcelona Health Survey (N=3270), public stigma was defined as scores at or above the 66th percentile of an index of 2 questions on the general population's perceptions of people who use drugs as failures and as dangerous (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84). Survey participants were categorised into 3 areas based on their proximity to a drug treatment centre: in a buffer within 150 metres, between 150 and 300-metres, and the rest of the city. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between perceived public stigma and spatial proximity to a drug treatment centre, as well as variations among sociodemographic profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Living within 150 metres of a drug treatment centre increased the probability of perceived public stigma (odds ratio=1.85 95%CI 1.12-3.07). At the city level, higher public stigma was associated with the older population, those with a lower educational level, and those born in a low-income country. However, the increase in public stigma within the 150-metre buffer was driven by groups that showed low levels of stigma at the city level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Public stigma in the city is high and increases with proximity to a drug treatment centre, especially among groups that exhibit low levels of stigma at the city level. Identifying social groups showing high levels of \"not in my back yard\"-related stigma may help to redesign harm reduction interventions focusing on specific groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"136 ","pages":"104707"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have documented stigma towards people who use drugs, but a less well studied aspect of stigmatisation is the phenomenon known as "not in my backyard," The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between living near a drug treatment centre and the degree of perceived public stigma, as well as to identify differences among sociodemographic profiles.

Methods: Based on the Barcelona Health Survey (N=3270), public stigma was defined as scores at or above the 66th percentile of an index of 2 questions on the general population's perceptions of people who use drugs as failures and as dangerous (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84). Survey participants were categorised into 3 areas based on their proximity to a drug treatment centre: in a buffer within 150 metres, between 150 and 300-metres, and the rest of the city. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between perceived public stigma and spatial proximity to a drug treatment centre, as well as variations among sociodemographic profiles.

Results: Living within 150 metres of a drug treatment centre increased the probability of perceived public stigma (odds ratio=1.85 95%CI 1.12-3.07). At the city level, higher public stigma was associated with the older population, those with a lower educational level, and those born in a low-income country. However, the increase in public stigma within the 150-metre buffer was driven by groups that showed low levels of stigma at the city level.

Conclusion: Public stigma in the city is high and increases with proximity to a drug treatment centre, especially among groups that exhibit low levels of stigma at the city level. Identifying social groups showing high levels of "not in my back yard"-related stigma may help to redesign harm reduction interventions focusing on specific groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Stimulant-involved overdose deaths: Constructing dynamic hypotheses. Feasibility of implementing viral hepatitis services into a correctional service facility in Cape Town, South Africa. Monitoring hepatitis C elimination among people who inject drugs: A broader approach is required. Consent and violence amongst men in the context of sexualised drug use: A systematic scoping review. How do restrictions on opioid prescribing, harm reduction, and treatment coverage policies relate to opioid overdose deaths in the United States in 2013-2020? An application of a new state opioid policy scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1