A brief review of methods for determining time-activity patterns in California.

Abstract

Air pollution exposure has been found to be linked with numerous adverse human health effects. Because both air pollution concentrations and the location of human individuals change spatiotemporally, understanding the time-activity patterns (TAPs) is of utmost importance for the mitigation of adverse exposures and to improve the accuracy of air pollution and health analyses. "Time-activity patterns" outlined here broadly refer to the spatiotemporal positions of individuals. In this review paper, we briefly review past efforts on collecting individual TAP information for air pollution and health studies, with a specific focus on California efforts. We also critically summarize emerging technologies and approaches for collecting TAP data. Specifically, we critically reviewed five types of emerging TAP data sources, including call detail record, social media location data, Google Location History, iPhone Significant Location, and crowd-sourced location data. This review provides a comprehensive summary and critique of different methods to collect TAP information and offers recommendations for use in retrospective air pollution and health studies.Implications: In this review paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of approaches for collecting time-activity pattern (TAP) data from individuals, a crucial component in understanding human behavior and its implications across various fields such as urban planning, environmental science, and, particularly, public health in relation to air pollution exposures.Furthermore, our paper introduces and critically evaluates several emerging methods for TAP data collection. These novel approaches, including but not limited to Google Location History, iPhone Significant Locations, and crowdsourced smartphone location data, offer unprecedented granularity in tracking human activities. By showcasing these methodologies and their often not well-recognized weaknesses, we highlight both the potential and limitations of these tools to advance our understanding of human behavior patterns, especially in terms of how individuals interact with their environments. This discussion not only showcases the originality of our work but also sets the stage for future research directions that can benefit from these innovative data collection strategies.