Nanna Nørtoft Nielsen , Jonas Faartoft Jensen , Joachim Baech , Trine Trab , Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly , Claudia Schöllkopf , Andreas Due Ørskov , Hans Beier Ommen , Lene Sofie Granfeldt , Daniel Tuyet Kristensen , Marianne Tang Severinsen
{"title":"Second primary non-myeloid malignancies following intensive treatment for adult acute myeloid leukaemia: a Danish population-based cohort study","authors":"Nanna Nørtoft Nielsen , Jonas Faartoft Jensen , Joachim Baech , Trine Trab , Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly , Claudia Schöllkopf , Andreas Due Ørskov , Hans Beier Ommen , Lene Sofie Granfeldt , Daniel Tuyet Kristensen , Marianne Tang Severinsen","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Second primary malignancies (SPMs) are a well-known, long-term complication of antineoplastic treatment. This nationwide cohort study examined the risk of non-myeloid SPMs in survivors of adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy and, in some cases, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), compared to a matched general population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with incident AML between 2000 and 2018, alive and aged 18–70 years two years after start of intensive chemotherapy, were included and matched 1:10 to comparators from the general Danish population on sex, age, and the Nordic Multimorbidity Index. Exclusion criteria were non-myeloid SPMs for both AML survivors and comparators.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 750 AML survivors and 7500 comparators were followed for a median of 10.6 years. The hazard ratio (HR) of non-myeloid SPMs was 1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–1.89) for AML survivors compared to comparators, driven by non-melanoma skin cancer (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.90–3.35), not of solid cancer (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87–1.49). The 10-year cumulative incidences of any non-myeloid SPM were 13.5% (95% CI 10.6–16.5%) in AML survivors and 11.9% (95% CI 11.1–12.8%) in matched comparators. Additionally, AML survivors consolidated with alloSCT had a higher hazard rate of non-myeloid SPMs compared to non-transplanted AML survivors (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.00–2.26).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The increased rate of non-myeloid SPMs observed in this population-based cohort study of AML survivors was almost entirely driven by non-melanoma skin cancer and is thus outweighed by the importance of intensive chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>Svend Andersen</span>, <span>Heinrich Kopps</span>, and <span>Karen Elise Jensen’s Foundation</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 101204"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224003739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Second primary malignancies (SPMs) are a well-known, long-term complication of antineoplastic treatment. This nationwide cohort study examined the risk of non-myeloid SPMs in survivors of adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy and, in some cases, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), compared to a matched general population.
Methods
Patients with incident AML between 2000 and 2018, alive and aged 18–70 years two years after start of intensive chemotherapy, were included and matched 1:10 to comparators from the general Danish population on sex, age, and the Nordic Multimorbidity Index. Exclusion criteria were non-myeloid SPMs for both AML survivors and comparators.
Findings
A total of 750 AML survivors and 7500 comparators were followed for a median of 10.6 years. The hazard ratio (HR) of non-myeloid SPMs was 1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–1.89) for AML survivors compared to comparators, driven by non-melanoma skin cancer (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.90–3.35), not of solid cancer (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87–1.49). The 10-year cumulative incidences of any non-myeloid SPM were 13.5% (95% CI 10.6–16.5%) in AML survivors and 11.9% (95% CI 11.1–12.8%) in matched comparators. Additionally, AML survivors consolidated with alloSCT had a higher hazard rate of non-myeloid SPMs compared to non-transplanted AML survivors (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.00–2.26).
Interpretation
The increased rate of non-myeloid SPMs observed in this population-based cohort study of AML survivors was almost entirely driven by non-melanoma skin cancer and is thus outweighed by the importance of intensive chemotherapy.
Funding
Svend Andersen, Heinrich Kopps, and Karen Elise Jensen’s Foundation.
背景:第二原发恶性肿瘤(SPMs)是众所周知的抗肿瘤治疗的长期并发症。这项全国性队列研究检测了接受强化化疗和某些情况下同种异体干细胞移植(alloSCT)治疗的成人急性髓性白血病(AML)幸存者发生非髓性SPMs的风险,并与匹配的普通人群进行了比较。方法:纳入2000年至2018年期间发生AML的患者,年龄在18-70岁之间,在开始强化化疗两年后存活,并在性别、年龄和北欧多病指数方面与丹麦普通人群进行1:10匹配。AML幸存者和比较者的排除标准均为非髓系SPMs。研究结果:共有750名AML幸存者和7500名对照者被随访,中位时间为10.6年。与比较者相比,AML幸存者的非髓系SPMs的风险比(HR)为1.55(95%可信区间[CI] 1.27-1.89),非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.90-3.35)驱动,而实体癌(HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87-1.49)驱动。任何非髓系SPM的10年累积发病率在AML幸存者中为13.5% (95% CI 10.6-16.5%),在匹配的比较组中为11.9% (95% CI 11.1-12.8%)。此外,与未移植的AML幸存者相比,合并同种异体细胞移植的AML幸存者具有更高的非髓系SPMs危险率(调整HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.00-2.26)。解释:在这项基于人群的AML幸存者队列研究中观察到的非髓系SPMs发生率的增加几乎完全是由非黑色素瘤皮肤癌驱动的,因此强化化疗的重要性超过了这一点。资助:send Andersen, Heinrich Kopps和Karen Elise Jensen的基金会。
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, a gold open access journal, is part of The Lancet's global effort to promote healthcare quality and accessibility worldwide. It focuses on advancing clinical practice and health policy in the European region to enhance health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating changes in clinical practice and health policy. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces on regional health topics, such as infection and disease prevention, healthy aging, and reducing health disparities.