Transversus abdominis plane block combined with intrathecal fentanyl versus intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-106044
Sun-Kyung Park, Youngwon Kim, Hansol Kim, Jin-Tae Kim
{"title":"Transversus abdominis plane block combined with intrathecal fentanyl versus intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.","authors":"Sun-Kyung Park, Youngwon Kim, Hansol Kim, Jin-Tae Kim","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal morphine is the standard for post-cesarean analgesia but often causes pruritus and may be unavailable in resource-limited settings. This study assessed whether a combination of bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and intrathecal fentanyl provides non-inferior analgesia compared with intrathecal morphine following cesarean delivery within the multimodal analgesia context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty mothers were randomized to receive either intrathecal fentanyl 10 µg with bilateral TAP block using 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side (TF group) or intrathecal morphine 75 µg with a saline sham block (M group). All patients received standard multimodal analgesia. Primary outcome was pain score with movement at 24 hours postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 on the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, time to first opioid, pruritus, nausea/vomiting, patient satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pain score with movement at 24 hours was 5.4 in the TF group and 4.8 in the M group (mean difference (95% CI), 0.6 (-0.3 to 1.5), p=0.202), with the upper margin of 95% CI exceeding the non-inferior margin. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was higher in the TF group (median (IQR), 585 (390-745) vs 140 (55-405) µg; p<0.001). Pruritus was more frequent in the M group (60% vs 10%; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl is not non-inferior to intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia. However, intrathecal morphine was associated with a higher incidence of pruritus, suggesting TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl as a suitable alternative when reducing pruritus is a priority.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04824274.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"330-336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal morphine is the standard for post-cesarean analgesia but often causes pruritus and may be unavailable in resource-limited settings. This study assessed whether a combination of bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and intrathecal fentanyl provides non-inferior analgesia compared with intrathecal morphine following cesarean delivery within the multimodal analgesia context.

Methods: Eighty mothers were randomized to receive either intrathecal fentanyl 10 µg with bilateral TAP block using 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side (TF group) or intrathecal morphine 75 µg with a saline sham block (M group). All patients received standard multimodal analgesia. Primary outcome was pain score with movement at 24 hours postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 on the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, time to first opioid, pruritus, nausea/vomiting, patient satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes.

Results: The mean pain score with movement at 24 hours was 5.4 in the TF group and 4.8 in the M group (mean difference (95% CI), 0.6 (-0.3 to 1.5), p=0.202), with the upper margin of 95% CI exceeding the non-inferior margin. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was higher in the TF group (median (IQR), 585 (390-745) vs 140 (55-405) µg; p<0.001). Pruritus was more frequent in the M group (60% vs 10%; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Bilateral TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl is not non-inferior to intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia. However, intrathecal morphine was associated with a higher incidence of pruritus, suggesting TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl as a suitable alternative when reducing pruritus is a priority.

Trial registration number: NCT04824274.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经腹平面阻滞联合鞘内芬太尼与鞘内吗啡用于剖宫产后镇痛:一项随机非劣效性临床试验。
背景:鞘内吗啡是剖宫产后镇痛的标准,但经常引起瘙痒,在资源有限的情况下可能无法获得。本研究评估了在剖宫产后多模式镇痛情况下,双侧经腹平面(TAP)阻滞和鞘内芬太尼联合使用是否比鞘内吗啡提供非亚次镇痛。方法:80名母亲随机接受鞘内芬太尼10µg +双侧TAP阻断(每侧15 mL 0.375%罗哌卡因)(TF组)或鞘内吗啡75µg +生理盐水假阻断(M组)。所有患者均接受标准的多模式镇痛。主要结局是术后24小时的疼痛和运动评分,在数值评定量表上的非劣效差为1。次要结局包括阿片类药物消耗、获得首个阿片类药物的时间、瘙痒、恶心/呕吐、患者满意度和新生儿结局。结果:TF组24小时运动时疼痛平均评分为5.4分,M组为4.8分(平均差异(95% CI)为0.6 (-0.3 ~ 1.5),p=0.202), 95% CI上边界超过非下边界。TF组术后芬太尼用量较高(中位数(IQR), 585 (390-745) vs 140(55-405)µg;结论:双侧剖宫产后穿刺阻滞鞘内芬太尼的镇痛效果优于鞘内吗啡。然而,鞘内吗啡与瘙痒的发生率较高相关,这表明当减轻瘙痒是优先考虑的时候,用鞘内芬太尼阻断TAP是一种合适的选择。试验注册号:NCT04824274。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Analgesic efficacy and functional outcomes of 10 versus 20 mL bupivacaine for popliteal plexus block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Epidural catheters and continuous heparin infusions: navigating complex clinical decisions with incomplete information. Prospective, non-inferiority, multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to standard radiofrequency ablation to manage chronic facetogenic lumbar back pain. Randomized comparison between interscalene and combined infraclavicular-anterior suprascapular nerve blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Clinically feasible TENS-pressure-cuff paradigm for conditioned pain modulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1