{"title":"Is Artificial Intelligence the Next Co-Pilot for Primary Care in Diagnosing and Recommending Treatments for Depression?","authors":"Inbar Levkovich","doi":"10.3390/medsci13010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression poses significant challenges to global healthcare systems and impacts the quality of life of individuals and their family members. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have had a transformative impact on the diagnosis and treatment of depression. These innovations have the potential to significantly enhance clinical decision-making processes and improve patient outcomes in healthcare settings. AI-powered tools can analyze extensive patient data-including medical records, genetic information, and behavioral patterns-to identify early warning signs of depression, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy. By recognizing subtle indicators that traditional assessments may overlook, these tools enable healthcare providers to make timely and precise diagnostic decisions that are crucial in preventing the onset or escalation of depressive episodes. In terms of treatment, AI algorithms can assist in personalizing therapeutic interventions by predicting the effectiveness of various approaches for individual patients based on their unique characteristics and medical history. This includes recommending tailored treatment plans that consider the patient's specific symptoms. Such personalized strategies aim to optimize therapeutic outcomes and improve the overall efficiency of healthcare. This theoretical review uniquely synthesizes current evidence on AI applications in primary care depression management, offering a comprehensive analysis of both diagnostic and treatment personalization capabilities. Alongside these advancements, we also address the conflicting findings in the field and the presence of biases that necessitate important limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Depression poses significant challenges to global healthcare systems and impacts the quality of life of individuals and their family members. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have had a transformative impact on the diagnosis and treatment of depression. These innovations have the potential to significantly enhance clinical decision-making processes and improve patient outcomes in healthcare settings. AI-powered tools can analyze extensive patient data-including medical records, genetic information, and behavioral patterns-to identify early warning signs of depression, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy. By recognizing subtle indicators that traditional assessments may overlook, these tools enable healthcare providers to make timely and precise diagnostic decisions that are crucial in preventing the onset or escalation of depressive episodes. In terms of treatment, AI algorithms can assist in personalizing therapeutic interventions by predicting the effectiveness of various approaches for individual patients based on their unique characteristics and medical history. This includes recommending tailored treatment plans that consider the patient's specific symptoms. Such personalized strategies aim to optimize therapeutic outcomes and improve the overall efficiency of healthcare. This theoretical review uniquely synthesizes current evidence on AI applications in primary care depression management, offering a comprehensive analysis of both diagnostic and treatment personalization capabilities. Alongside these advancements, we also address the conflicting findings in the field and the presence of biases that necessitate important limitations.