Updates on CAD risk assessment: using the coronary artery calcium score in combination with traditional risk factors.

Kiara Rezaie-Kalamtari, Zeinab Norouzi, Alireza Salmanipour, Hossein Mehrali
{"title":"Updates on CAD risk assessment: using the coronary artery calcium score in combination with traditional risk factors.","authors":"Kiara Rezaie-Kalamtari, Zeinab Norouzi, Alireza Salmanipour, Hossein Mehrali","doi":"10.1186/s43044-025-00608-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, so prevention and early diagnosis play important roles to reduce mortality and morbidity. Traditional risk-score assessments were used to find the at-risk patients in order to prevent or early treatment of CAD. Adding imaging data to traditional risk-score systems will able us to find these patients more confidently and reduce the probable mismanagements.</p><p><strong>Main text: </strong>Measuring the vascular calcification by coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can prepare valuable data for this purpose. Using CAC became more popular in recent years. The most applicable method to evaluate CAC is Agatston scoring using computed tomography (CT) scanning. Patients are classified into several subgroups: no evidence of CAD (score 0), mild CAD (score 1-10), minimal CAD (score 11-100), moderate CAD (score 101-400), and severe CAD (score > 400) and higher than1000 as the extreme risk of CVD events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAC assessment was recommended in the patients older than 40 years old with CAD risk factors, the ones with stable angina, borderline-to-intermediate-risk group, etc. According to the results of the CAC the patients may be candidate for further evaluation for needing revascularization, medical treatment, or routine follow-up. Adding artificial intelligence (AI) to CAC will prepare more data and can increase the reliability of our approach to the patients promising a bright future to improve this technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":74993,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology","volume":"77 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-025-00608-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, so prevention and early diagnosis play important roles to reduce mortality and morbidity. Traditional risk-score assessments were used to find the at-risk patients in order to prevent or early treatment of CAD. Adding imaging data to traditional risk-score systems will able us to find these patients more confidently and reduce the probable mismanagements.

Main text: Measuring the vascular calcification by coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can prepare valuable data for this purpose. Using CAC became more popular in recent years. The most applicable method to evaluate CAC is Agatston scoring using computed tomography (CT) scanning. Patients are classified into several subgroups: no evidence of CAD (score 0), mild CAD (score 1-10), minimal CAD (score 11-100), moderate CAD (score 101-400), and severe CAD (score > 400) and higher than1000 as the extreme risk of CVD events.

Conclusions: CAC assessment was recommended in the patients older than 40 years old with CAD risk factors, the ones with stable angina, borderline-to-intermediate-risk group, etc. According to the results of the CAC the patients may be candidate for further evaluation for needing revascularization, medical treatment, or routine follow-up. Adding artificial intelligence (AI) to CAC will prepare more data and can increase the reliability of our approach to the patients promising a bright future to improve this technology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠心病风险评估的最新进展:将冠状动脉钙评分与传统危险因素结合使用。
背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是全球第三大死亡原因,预防和早期诊断对降低死亡率和发病率具有重要作用。采用传统的风险评分方法发现高危患者,以预防或早期治疗冠心病。将影像数据添加到传统的风险评分系统将使我们能够更自信地发现这些患者并减少可能的管理不当。通过冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分测量血管钙化可以为这一目的提供有价值的数据。近年来,使用CAC变得越来越流行。评估CAC最适用的方法是使用计算机断层扫描(CT)进行Agatston评分。患者分为几个亚组:无CAD证据(0分),轻度CAD(1-10分),轻度CAD(11-100分),中度CAD(101-400分)和重度CAD(> 400分),高于1000的CVD事件极端风险。结论:对于年龄大于40岁且有冠心病危险因素的患者、稳定型心绞痛患者、边缘-中危组患者等,推荐进行CAC评估。根据CAC的结果,患者可能需要进一步评估是否需要血运重建、药物治疗或常规随访。将人工智能(AI)添加到CAC将准备更多的数据,并可以提高我们对患者的方法的可靠性,并承诺改善这项技术的光明未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aortic response to cancer therapy: a narrative review of the radiotherapy paradox and clinical implications. Pharmacovigilance and clinical insights into perindopril-induced thrombocytopenia: a case report of diagnostic challenges and therapeutic alternatives. Percutaneous closure of native and residual ventricular septal defects using a diverse range of occluder devices: a single-centre experience. Anemia and long-term outcomes after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: a retrospective cohort study of mortality and clinical restenosis. Effects of Gilbert syndrome on cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1