Biologic therapies targeting type 2 cytokines are effective at improving asthma symptoms and control—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rebecca E. Bignold PhD, Hannah Busby BSc, Jenny Holloway BSc, Aaishah Kasu BSc, Sonia Sian BSc, Jill R. Johnson PhD
{"title":"Biologic therapies targeting type 2 cytokines are effective at improving asthma symptoms and control—a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Rebecca E. Bignold PhD,&nbsp;Hannah Busby BSc,&nbsp;Jenny Holloway BSc,&nbsp;Aaishah Kasu BSc,&nbsp;Sonia Sian BSc,&nbsp;Jill R. Johnson PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Allergic asthma is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease driven by aeroallergen exposure. In severe asthma, the current standard of care does not fully control disease symptoms, indicating an unmet clinical need. Biologic therapies targeting cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 have been shown to provide benefits to asthmatic patients over currently existing asthma treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to review the effects of recently developed biologic therapies for asthma treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this meta-analysis, the impact of IL-5 and IL-4/IL-13 biologic inhibitors was critically appraised considering overall lung function, symptom control, and oral corticosteroid use in asthmatic patients. Trials were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. Clinical trials assessing severe asthmatic participants older than 12 years were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis included 6600 participants from 14 trials published in 2013 to 2020. For IL-5 inhibitors, improvements in FEV<sub>1</sub> (mean difference [MD], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.12), Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (MD, −0.4; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.38), annual exacerbation rates (MD, −0.46; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.45), and oral corticosteroid use (MD, −50; 95% CI, −52.58 to −47.42) favored biologic treatment. Significant improvements in FEV<sub>1</sub> (MD, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.11), Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (MD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.18), and annual exacerbation rates (MD, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.14) were also seen with anti–IL-4/IL-13 biologic therapies. However, anti–IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors were associated with more adverse events than placebo (MD, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Biologic inhibitors targeting T<sub>H</sub>2 cytokines are beneficial for improving overall asthma control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277282932400170X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Allergic asthma is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease driven by aeroallergen exposure. In severe asthma, the current standard of care does not fully control disease symptoms, indicating an unmet clinical need. Biologic therapies targeting cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 have been shown to provide benefits to asthmatic patients over currently existing asthma treatments.

Objective

We sought to review the effects of recently developed biologic therapies for asthma treatment.

Methods

In this meta-analysis, the impact of IL-5 and IL-4/IL-13 biologic inhibitors was critically appraised considering overall lung function, symptom control, and oral corticosteroid use in asthmatic patients. Trials were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov. Clinical trials assessing severe asthmatic participants older than 12 years were included.

Results

The meta-analysis included 6600 participants from 14 trials published in 2013 to 2020. For IL-5 inhibitors, improvements in FEV1 (mean difference [MD], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.12), Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (MD, −0.4; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.38), annual exacerbation rates (MD, −0.46; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.45), and oral corticosteroid use (MD, −50; 95% CI, −52.58 to −47.42) favored biologic treatment. Significant improvements in FEV1 (MD, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.11), Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (MD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.18), and annual exacerbation rates (MD, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.14) were also seen with anti–IL-4/IL-13 biologic therapies. However, anti–IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors were associated with more adverse events than placebo (MD, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.3).

Conclusions

Biologic inhibitors targeting TH2 cytokines are beneficial for improving overall asthma control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
期刊最新文献
Reply Editorial board A different lens to explore health literacy skills in atopic conditions Anti–IL-4Ra therapy is superior to other biologic classes in treating allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis Investigating health care pathways for anaphylaxis: Seeing the bigger picture through linked data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1