Biologic therapies targeting type 2 cytokines are effective at improving asthma symptoms and control—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rebecca E. Bignold PhD, Hannah Busby BSc, Jenny Holloway BSc, Aaishah Kasu BSc, Sonia Sian BSc, Jill R. Johnson PhD
{"title":"Biologic therapies targeting type 2 cytokines are effective at improving asthma symptoms and control—a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Rebecca E. Bignold PhD,&nbsp;Hannah Busby BSc,&nbsp;Jenny Holloway BSc,&nbsp;Aaishah Kasu BSc,&nbsp;Sonia Sian BSc,&nbsp;Jill R. Johnson PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Allergic asthma is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease driven by aeroallergen exposure. In severe asthma, the current standard of care does not fully control disease symptoms, indicating an unmet clinical need. Biologic therapies targeting cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 have been shown to provide benefits to asthmatic patients over currently existing asthma treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to review the effects of recently developed biologic therapies for asthma treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this meta-analysis, the impact of IL-5 and IL-4/IL-13 biologic inhibitors was critically appraised considering overall lung function, symptom control, and oral corticosteroid use in asthmatic patients. Trials were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. Clinical trials assessing severe asthmatic participants older than 12 years were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis included 6600 participants from 14 trials published in 2013 to 2020. For IL-5 inhibitors, improvements in FEV<sub>1</sub> (mean difference [MD], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.12), Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (MD, −0.4; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.38), annual exacerbation rates (MD, −0.46; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.45), and oral corticosteroid use (MD, −50; 95% CI, −52.58 to −47.42) favored biologic treatment. Significant improvements in FEV<sub>1</sub> (MD, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.11), Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (MD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.18), and annual exacerbation rates (MD, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.14) were also seen with anti–IL-4/IL-13 biologic therapies. However, anti–IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors were associated with more adverse events than placebo (MD, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Biologic inhibitors targeting T<sub>H</sub>2 cytokines are beneficial for improving overall asthma control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277282932400170X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Allergic asthma is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease driven by aeroallergen exposure. In severe asthma, the current standard of care does not fully control disease symptoms, indicating an unmet clinical need. Biologic therapies targeting cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 have been shown to provide benefits to asthmatic patients over currently existing asthma treatments.

Objective

We sought to review the effects of recently developed biologic therapies for asthma treatment.

Methods

In this meta-analysis, the impact of IL-5 and IL-4/IL-13 biologic inhibitors was critically appraised considering overall lung function, symptom control, and oral corticosteroid use in asthmatic patients. Trials were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov. Clinical trials assessing severe asthmatic participants older than 12 years were included.

Results

The meta-analysis included 6600 participants from 14 trials published in 2013 to 2020. For IL-5 inhibitors, improvements in FEV1 (mean difference [MD], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.12), Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (MD, −0.4; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.38), annual exacerbation rates (MD, −0.46; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.45), and oral corticosteroid use (MD, −50; 95% CI, −52.58 to −47.42) favored biologic treatment. Significant improvements in FEV1 (MD, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.11), Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (MD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.18), and annual exacerbation rates (MD, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.14) were also seen with anti–IL-4/IL-13 biologic therapies. However, anti–IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors were associated with more adverse events than placebo (MD, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.3).

Conclusions

Biologic inhibitors targeting TH2 cytokines are beneficial for improving overall asthma control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对2型细胞因子的生物疗法在改善哮喘症状和控制方面是有效的-系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:过敏性哮喘是由空气过敏原暴露引起的一种非常普遍的慢性炎症性疾病。在严重哮喘中,目前的护理标准并不能完全控制疾病症状,表明临床需求尚未得到满足。针对细胞因子IL-4、IL-5和IL-13的生物疗法已被证明比现有的哮喘治疗方法更有利于哮喘患者。目的:我们试图回顾最近发展的生物疗法治疗哮喘的效果。方法:在本荟萃分析中,考虑到哮喘患者的整体肺功能、症状控制和口服皮质类固醇的使用,对IL-5和IL-4/IL-13生物抑制剂的影响进行了批判性评估。试验通过PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和clinicaltrials.gov进行鉴定。评估12岁以上严重哮喘患者的临床试验纳入研究。结果:荟萃分析纳入了2013年至2020年发表的14项试验的6600名参与者。对于IL-5抑制剂,FEV1的改善(平均差[MD], 0.11;95% CI, 0.11 ~ 0.12),哮喘控制问卷评分(MD, -0.4;95% CI, -0.41至-0.38),年加重率(MD, -0.46;95% CI, -0.48至-0.45)和口服皮质类固醇使用(MD, -50;95% CI(-52.58 ~ -47.42)倾向于生物治疗。FEV1显著改善(MD, 0.11;95% CI, 0.10 ~ 0.11),哮喘控制问卷评分(MD, -0.20;95% CI, -0.22至-0.18)和年加重率(MD, -0.15;95% CI, -0.16至-0.14)也见于抗il -4/IL-13生物疗法。然而,与安慰剂相比,抗il -4/IL-13抑制剂与更多不良事件相关(MD, 1.13;95% CI, 0.97 ~ 1.3)。结论:针对TH2细胞因子的生物抑制剂有利于改善哮喘的整体控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
期刊最新文献
A computational phenotype for difficult-to-treat asthma with corticosteroid overuse using electronic health care records Probiotics for pediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Associations between dietary intake and asthma outcomes: Evidence from pooled analysis in two independent multiethnic Asian cohorts BRIDGE implementation science study to improve chronic spontaneous urticaria outcomes in Italy NSAID drug hypersensitivity in a United States–based population: An assessment of quality of life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1