Outcomes of pediatric patients with suspected allergies to COVID-19 vaccines.

Qin Ying Lim, Tsun Ming Lau, Sophie H Y Lai, Gilbert T Chua, Kaiyue Zhang, Jennifer H Y Lam, Wilfred H S Wong, Yu Lung Lau, Jaime S Rosa Duque
{"title":"Outcomes of pediatric patients with suspected allergies to COVID-19 vaccines.","authors":"Qin Ying Lim, Tsun Ming Lau, Sophie H Y Lai, Gilbert T Chua, Kaiyue Zhang, Jennifer H Y Lam, Wilfred H S Wong, Yu Lung Lau, Jaime S Rosa Duque","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse effects following immunizations (AEFIs) can contribute to vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated clinical outcomes of AEFIs subsequent to administration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine at 2 pediatric allergy centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on pediatric patients referred for COVID-19 AEFI concerns between March 2021 and October 2022 were reviewed. The collected data included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes of prior COVID-19 vaccination, recommendations after consultation, and outcomes of revaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 163 patients were separated into 2 groups based on the absence (n = 89 [54.6%]) or presence (n = 74 [45.4%]) of prior COVID-19-related AEFIs. The most common reason for referral without a prior AEFI was another suspected drug allergy (n = 58 [35.6%]). All patients in this group were recommended for COVID-19 vaccination. Of the 163 patients, 82 (92.1%) proceeded with vaccination, with 77 of them (93.9%) tolerating vaccination. Most of those with a prior COVID-19-related AEFI had a delayed cutaneous reaction (n = 60 [37.0%]); 1 patient (0.6%) had suspected anaphylaxis. In this group, 6 (8.1%) were advised to postpone COVID-19 vaccination until their debilitating skin conditions had improved in response to further treatment, whereas 45 (77.6%) tolerated subsequent vaccination to the same or an alternate COVID-19 vaccine type. The most common AEFI on revaccination was urticaria (in 8 of 11 patients [72.7%]). AEFI on revaccination was significantly associated with a history of spontaneous urticaria or angioedema (relative risk = 3.6 [95% CI = 1.30-9.99]; <i>P</i> = .020) and urticaria following COVID-19 vaccination previously (relative risk = 4.12 [95% CI = 1.22-13.87]; <i>P</i> = .017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with a history of urticaria or angioedema related or unrelated to prior COVID-19 vaccination were at higher risk of a COVID-19-related AEFI on revaccination, although most were able to complete the vaccination series under the management of our immunology/allergy service.</p>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 1","pages":"100387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse effects following immunizations (AEFIs) can contribute to vaccine hesitancy.

Objective: We evaluated clinical outcomes of AEFIs subsequent to administration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine at 2 pediatric allergy centers.

Methods: Data on pediatric patients referred for COVID-19 AEFI concerns between March 2021 and October 2022 were reviewed. The collected data included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes of prior COVID-19 vaccination, recommendations after consultation, and outcomes of revaccination.

Results: The 163 patients were separated into 2 groups based on the absence (n = 89 [54.6%]) or presence (n = 74 [45.4%]) of prior COVID-19-related AEFIs. The most common reason for referral without a prior AEFI was another suspected drug allergy (n = 58 [35.6%]). All patients in this group were recommended for COVID-19 vaccination. Of the 163 patients, 82 (92.1%) proceeded with vaccination, with 77 of them (93.9%) tolerating vaccination. Most of those with a prior COVID-19-related AEFI had a delayed cutaneous reaction (n = 60 [37.0%]); 1 patient (0.6%) had suspected anaphylaxis. In this group, 6 (8.1%) were advised to postpone COVID-19 vaccination until their debilitating skin conditions had improved in response to further treatment, whereas 45 (77.6%) tolerated subsequent vaccination to the same or an alternate COVID-19 vaccine type. The most common AEFI on revaccination was urticaria (in 8 of 11 patients [72.7%]). AEFI on revaccination was significantly associated with a history of spontaneous urticaria or angioedema (relative risk = 3.6 [95% CI = 1.30-9.99]; P = .020) and urticaria following COVID-19 vaccination previously (relative risk = 4.12 [95% CI = 1.22-13.87]; P = .017).

Conclusions: Children with a history of urticaria or angioedema related or unrelated to prior COVID-19 vaccination were at higher risk of a COVID-19-related AEFI on revaccination, although most were able to complete the vaccination series under the management of our immunology/allergy service.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
期刊最新文献
Eosinophil ETosis and Charcot-Leyden crystals in Kimura disease. Tezepelumab treatment in severe asthma with recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Case series. Correspondence re: Long-term efficacy and safety of cow's milk anaphylaxis specific immunotherapy: Allergen unresponsiveness via the Tolerance Induction Program. Correspondence re: Randhawa et al, TIP's success in the treatment of cow's milk anaphylaxis leaves many questions unanswered. Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1