Biologic Treatments for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP): A Comparative Review of Efficiency and Risks.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.77804
Mihai I Tănase, Mara Tanase, Marcel Cosgarea, Gheorghe Doinel Radeanu, Septimiu Sever Pop, Alma A Maniu
{"title":"Biologic Treatments for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP): A Comparative Review of Efficiency and Risks.","authors":"Mihai I Tănase, Mara Tanase, Marcel Cosgarea, Gheorghe Doinel Radeanu, Septimiu Sever Pop, Alma A Maniu","doi":"10.7759/cureus.77804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal passages and sinuses, often characterized by nasal congestion, loss of smell, facial pressure, and nasal discharge. Conventional treatments, such as corticosteroids and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), often provide only temporary relief, with frequent recurrence of symptoms. For patients with severe, refractory CRSwNP, biologic therapies have emerged as a promising treatment option. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of biologic treatments for CRSwNP, including dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab. We analyze clinical trial data, patient-reported outcomes, and the latest research on the use of biologics in CRSwNP management. Our findings confirm the efficacy of biologics in treating CRSwNP, showing consistent improvements in both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. The use of biologics resulted in a significant reduction in nasal polyp size, improved nasal congestion, and reduced the need for further surgery or systemic corticosteroids. Moreover, patients experienced an improved sense of smell and a better quality of life. This review also includes a comparative analysis of the three biologics, highlighting their efficiency and potential risks. The findings suggest that dupilumab may be the most effective biologic therapy for CRSwNP, showing superior efficacy compared to mepolizumab and omalizumab in reducing nasal polyp size and improving nasal congestion. The article provides valuable insights for healthcare providers and patients considering biologic therapy for CRSwNP, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment decisions based on individual patient factors, including disease severity, comorbidities, and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 1","pages":"e77804"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal passages and sinuses, often characterized by nasal congestion, loss of smell, facial pressure, and nasal discharge. Conventional treatments, such as corticosteroids and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), often provide only temporary relief, with frequent recurrence of symptoms. For patients with severe, refractory CRSwNP, biologic therapies have emerged as a promising treatment option. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of biologic treatments for CRSwNP, including dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab. We analyze clinical trial data, patient-reported outcomes, and the latest research on the use of biologics in CRSwNP management. Our findings confirm the efficacy of biologics in treating CRSwNP, showing consistent improvements in both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. The use of biologics resulted in a significant reduction in nasal polyp size, improved nasal congestion, and reduced the need for further surgery or systemic corticosteroids. Moreover, patients experienced an improved sense of smell and a better quality of life. This review also includes a comparative analysis of the three biologics, highlighting their efficiency and potential risks. The findings suggest that dupilumab may be the most effective biologic therapy for CRSwNP, showing superior efficacy compared to mepolizumab and omalizumab in reducing nasal polyp size and improving nasal congestion. The article provides valuable insights for healthcare providers and patients considering biologic therapy for CRSwNP, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment decisions based on individual patient factors, including disease severity, comorbidities, and preferences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的生物治疗:疗效和风险的比较回顾。
慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)是一种鼻通道和鼻窦的慢性炎症性疾病,通常以鼻塞、嗅觉丧失、面部压力和鼻溢液为特征。常规治疗,如皮质类固醇和内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS),往往只能提供暂时的缓解,症状经常复发。对于严重难治性CRSwNP患者,生物疗法已成为一种有希望的治疗选择。本综述评估了CRSwNP生物治疗的有效性和安全性,包括dupilumab、mepolizumab和omalizumab。我们分析临床试验数据,患者报告的结果,以及在CRSwNP管理中使用生物制剂的最新研究。我们的研究结果证实了生物制剂治疗CRSwNP的有效性,在临床和患者报告的结果中均显示出一致的改善。生物制剂的使用显著减少了鼻息肉的大小,改善了鼻塞,减少了进一步手术或全身皮质类固醇的需要。此外,患者的嗅觉得到改善,生活质量也有所提高。本文还对这三种生物制剂进行了比较分析,强调了它们的有效性和潜在风险。研究结果提示,dupilumab可能是治疗CRSwNP最有效的生物疗法,在减小鼻息肉大小和改善鼻塞方面,dupilumab的疗效优于mepolizumab和omalizumab。这篇文章为考虑CRSwNP生物治疗的医疗保健提供者和患者提供了有价值的见解,强调了基于个体患者因素的个性化治疗决策的重要性,包括疾病严重程度、合并症和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychological Safety in Surgical Training. Gliosarcoma: A Case Series and Comprehensive Literature Review. Three Cases of Resection of Alpha-Fetoprotein-Positive High-Grade Fetal Adenocarcinoma of the Lung From a Single Institution. Correction: Integrating Planetary Health Into Interprofessional Education: A Scoping Review. Correction: Hospital Readmissions After Vertebral Fracture in Older Adults: A Comparison of Management Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1