Cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals’ perceptions of bedrails as a measure of physical restraint in the hospital setting

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afaf002
César Gálvez-Barrón, Ana González-De Luna, Carlos Pérez-López, Oscar Macho-Perez
{"title":"Cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals’ perceptions of bedrails as a measure of physical restraint in the hospital setting","authors":"César Gálvez-Barrón, Ana González-De Luna, Carlos Pérez-López, Oscar Macho-Perez","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Although bedrails are considered a restraint measure under the legal regulations in Spain, no data on the related perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are available. Thus, this study aimed to calculate the proportion of HCPs in the hospital setting that consider bedrails to be a restraint measure. Methods Between June and December 2022, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted among the HCPs at our institution. Basal information was collected in the first section, and seven questions related to bedrails were included in the second. The perception of bedrails as a restraint measure was evaluated with a multiple-choice question in which devices that can be considered restraint measures were listed. Results A total of 246 HCPs participated in the survey, 201 of whom passed quality control and were analysed. The mean age was 42.2 years old, and 85% of the participants were women. The proportion of HCPs who considered bedrails as a restraint measure was 54.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47.3–61.1) in the total group and 54.5% (95% CI: 44.1–65.0) in the intermediate care subgroup. These proportions were significantly lower for HCPs who worked night shifts and among those who believed that bedrails do not limit patient mobility. Conclusions There is a considerable difference between what is established in legal regulations and the perceptions of HCPs in terms of bedrails being considered a restraint measure. Our results can help improve the content of training programs on the use of restraint measures by HCPs.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Although bedrails are considered a restraint measure under the legal regulations in Spain, no data on the related perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are available. Thus, this study aimed to calculate the proportion of HCPs in the hospital setting that consider bedrails to be a restraint measure. Methods Between June and December 2022, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted among the HCPs at our institution. Basal information was collected in the first section, and seven questions related to bedrails were included in the second. The perception of bedrails as a restraint measure was evaluated with a multiple-choice question in which devices that can be considered restraint measures were listed. Results A total of 246 HCPs participated in the survey, 201 of whom passed quality control and were analysed. The mean age was 42.2 years old, and 85% of the participants were women. The proportion of HCPs who considered bedrails as a restraint measure was 54.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47.3–61.1) in the total group and 54.5% (95% CI: 44.1–65.0) in the intermediate care subgroup. These proportions were significantly lower for HCPs who worked night shifts and among those who believed that bedrails do not limit patient mobility. Conclusions There is a considerable difference between what is established in legal regulations and the perceptions of HCPs in terms of bedrails being considered a restraint measure. Our results can help improve the content of training programs on the use of restraint measures by HCPs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of 15-year transitions across living and care settings in a population of Swedish older adults A mobile interactive cognitive self-assessment scale for screening cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease Cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals’ perceptions of bedrails as a measure of physical restraint in the hospital setting Outreach acute care for nursing homes: an observational study on the quality and cost-effectiveness of the Mobile Hospital Cognitive reserve and its impact on cognitive and functional abilities, physical activity and quality of life following a diagnosis of dementia: longitudinal findings from the Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (IDEAL) study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1