Pretreatment attrition after rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis diagnosis with Xpert MTB/RIF or ultra in high TB burden countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015977
Christelle Geneviève Jouego, Tom Decroo, Palmer Masumbe Netongo, Tinne Gils
{"title":"Pretreatment attrition after rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis diagnosis with Xpert MTB/RIF or ultra in high TB burden countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Christelle Geneviève Jouego, Tom Decroo, Palmer Masumbe Netongo, Tinne Gils","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The WHO endorsed the Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) technique since 2011 as initial test to diagnose rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). No systematic review has quantified the proportion of pretreatment attrition in RR-TB patients diagnosed with Xpert in high TB burden countries.Pretreatment attrition for RR-TB represents the gap between patients diagnosed and those who effectively started anti-TB treatment regardless of the reasons (which include pretreatment mortality (death of a diagnosed RR-TB patient before starting adequate treatment) and/or pretreatment loss to follow-up (PTLFU) (drop-out of a diagnosed RR-TB patient before initiation of anti-TB treatment).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we queried EMBASE, PubMed and Web of science to retrieve studies published between 2011 and 22 July 2024, that described pretreatment attrition for RR-TB using Xpert in high TB burden countries. Data on RR-TB patients who did not start treatment after diagnosis and reasons for not starting were extracted in an Excel table. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias among all included studies. The pooled proportion of pretreatment attrition and reasons were assessed using random-effects meta-analysis. Forest plots were generated using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty eligible studies from 21 countries were identified after full-text screening and included in the meta-analysis. Most studies used routine programme data. The pooled proportion of pretreatment attrition in included studies was 18% (95% CI: 12 to 25). PTLFU and pretreatment mortality were, respectively, reported in 10 and nine studies and explained 78% (95% CI: 51% to 92%) and 30% (95% CI: 15% to 52%) of attrition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pretreatment attrition was widespread, with significant heterogeneity between included studies. National TB programmes should ensure accurate data collection and reporting of pretreatment attrition to enable reliable overall control strategies.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022321509.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The WHO endorsed the Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) technique since 2011 as initial test to diagnose rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). No systematic review has quantified the proportion of pretreatment attrition in RR-TB patients diagnosed with Xpert in high TB burden countries.Pretreatment attrition for RR-TB represents the gap between patients diagnosed and those who effectively started anti-TB treatment regardless of the reasons (which include pretreatment mortality (death of a diagnosed RR-TB patient before starting adequate treatment) and/or pretreatment loss to follow-up (PTLFU) (drop-out of a diagnosed RR-TB patient before initiation of anti-TB treatment).

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we queried EMBASE, PubMed and Web of science to retrieve studies published between 2011 and 22 July 2024, that described pretreatment attrition for RR-TB using Xpert in high TB burden countries. Data on RR-TB patients who did not start treatment after diagnosis and reasons for not starting were extracted in an Excel table. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias among all included studies. The pooled proportion of pretreatment attrition and reasons were assessed using random-effects meta-analysis. Forest plots were generated using R software.

Results: Thirty eligible studies from 21 countries were identified after full-text screening and included in the meta-analysis. Most studies used routine programme data. The pooled proportion of pretreatment attrition in included studies was 18% (95% CI: 12 to 25). PTLFU and pretreatment mortality were, respectively, reported in 10 and nine studies and explained 78% (95% CI: 51% to 92%) and 30% (95% CI: 15% to 52%) of attrition.

Conclusion: Pretreatment attrition was widespread, with significant heterogeneity between included studies. National TB programmes should ensure accurate data collection and reporting of pretreatment attrition to enable reliable overall control strategies.

Prospero registration number: CRD42022321509.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在结核病高负担国家用Xpert MTB/RIF或ultra诊断利福平耐药结核病后的预处理损耗:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
自2011年以来,世卫组织批准了Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert)技术作为诊断利福平耐药结核病(RR-TB)的初始检测方法。尚无系统评价量化高结核负担国家诊断为Xpert的RR-TB患者的预处理损耗比例。耐药结核病的预处理损耗是指诊断出的患者与有效开始抗结核治疗的患者之间的差距,而不考虑任何原因(包括预处理死亡率(确诊的耐药结核病患者在开始适当治疗前死亡)和/或预处理丧失随访(PTLFU)(在开始抗结核治疗前确诊的耐药结核病患者退出治疗)。方法:在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们查询了EMBASE、PubMed和Web of science,检索了2011年至2024年7月22日期间发表的研究,这些研究描述了在结核病高负担国家使用Xpert治疗RR-TB的预处理损耗。诊断后未开始治疗的RR-TB患者的数据及其未开始治疗的原因提取在Excel表格中。采用改良版的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表来评估所有纳入研究的偏倚风险。使用随机效应荟萃分析评估预处理损耗的合并比例和原因。使用R软件生成森林样地。结果:来自21个国家的30项符合条件的研究经过全文筛选后被纳入meta分析。大多数研究使用常规方案数据。纳入的研究中预处理损耗的合并比例为18% (95% CI: 12 ~ 25)。10项和9项研究分别报告了PTLFU和预处理死亡率,并解释了78% (95% CI: 51%至92%)和30% (95% CI: 15%至52%)的磨损。结论:预处理损耗普遍存在,且纳入研究之间存在显著异质性。国家结核病规划应确保准确的数据收集和前处理损耗报告,以实现可靠的总体控制战略。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42022321509。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
The effect of deploying non-physician anaesthesia providers on surgical access and capacity across Nepal's primary and secondary government hospitals: a quasi-experimental mixed methods study. Cost-saving strategies for sustainable surgical care: a scoping review of efficiency models and potential approaches for low-income and middle-income countries. Pathways to care and service preferences, and experiences of women who self-manage abortion through community pharmacies in two counties of Kenya. Assessing the impact of the Taliban takeover on accessibility, availability, acceptability and quality of public healthcare facilities in Afghanistan: a mixed methods study. Lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic: Middle East and North Africa regional perspective for future preparedness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1