Gender-Equity Model for Liver Allocation Using Artificial Intelligence (GEMA-AI) for Waiting List Liver Transplant Prioritization

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.010
Antonio Manuel Gómez-Orellana , Manuel Luis Rodríguez-Perálvarez , David Guijo-Rubio , Pedro Antonio Gutiérrez , Avik Majumdar , Geoffrey W. McCaughan , Rhiannon Taylor , Emmanuel A. Tsochatzis , César Hervás-Martínez
{"title":"Gender-Equity Model for Liver Allocation Using Artificial Intelligence (GEMA-AI) for Waiting List Liver Transplant Prioritization","authors":"Antonio Manuel Gómez-Orellana ,&nbsp;Manuel Luis Rodríguez-Perálvarez ,&nbsp;David Guijo-Rubio ,&nbsp;Pedro Antonio Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;Avik Majumdar ,&nbsp;Geoffrey W. McCaughan ,&nbsp;Rhiannon Taylor ,&nbsp;Emmanuel A. Tsochatzis ,&nbsp;César Hervás-Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><div>We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence score (gender-equity model for liver allocation using artificial intelligence [GEMA-AI]) to predict liver transplantation (LT) waiting list outcomes using the same input variables contained in existing models.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a cohort study including adult LT candidates enlisted in the United Kingdom (2010–2020) for model training and internal validation and in Australia (1998–2020) for external validation. GEMA-AI combined international normalized ratio, bilirubin, sodium, and the Royal Free Hospital glomerular filtration rate in an explainable artificial neural network. GEMA-AI was compared with gender-equity model for liver allocation corrected by serum sodium (GEMA-Na), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease corrected by serum sodium for waiting list prioritization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 9320 patients: 5762 in the training cohort, 1920 in the internal validation cohort, and 1638 in the external validation cohort. The prevalence of 90-day mortality or delisting for sickness ranged from 5.3% to 6% across different cohorts. GEMA-AI showed better discrimination than GEMA-Na, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease corrected by serum sodium, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 in the internal and external validation cohorts, with a more pronounced benefit in women and in patients showing at least 1 extreme analytical value. Accounting for identical input variables, the transition from a linear to a nonlinear score (from GEMA-Na to GEMA-AI) resulted in a differential prioritization of 6.4% of patients within the first 90 days and would potentially save 1 in 59 deaths overall, and 1 in 13 deaths among women. Results did not substantially change when ascites was not included in the models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of explainable machine learning models may be preferred over conventional regression-based models for waiting list prioritization in LT. GEMA-AI made more accurate predictions of waiting list outcomes, particularly for the sickest patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"23 12","pages":"Pages 2187-2196"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356524011352","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence score (gender-equity model for liver allocation using artificial intelligence [GEMA-AI]) to predict liver transplantation (LT) waiting list outcomes using the same input variables contained in existing models.

Methods

This was a cohort study including adult LT candidates enlisted in the United Kingdom (2010–2020) for model training and internal validation and in Australia (1998–2020) for external validation. GEMA-AI combined international normalized ratio, bilirubin, sodium, and the Royal Free Hospital glomerular filtration rate in an explainable artificial neural network. GEMA-AI was compared with gender-equity model for liver allocation corrected by serum sodium (GEMA-Na), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease corrected by serum sodium for waiting list prioritization.

Results

The study included 9320 patients: 5762 in the training cohort, 1920 in the internal validation cohort, and 1638 in the external validation cohort. The prevalence of 90-day mortality or delisting for sickness ranged from 5.3% to 6% across different cohorts. GEMA-AI showed better discrimination than GEMA-Na, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease corrected by serum sodium, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 in the internal and external validation cohorts, with a more pronounced benefit in women and in patients showing at least 1 extreme analytical value. Accounting for identical input variables, the transition from a linear to a nonlinear score (from GEMA-Na to GEMA-AI) resulted in a differential prioritization of 6.4% of patients within the first 90 days and would potentially save 1 in 59 deaths overall, and 1 in 13 deaths among women. Results did not substantially change when ascites was not included in the models.

Conclusions

The use of explainable machine learning models may be preferred over conventional regression-based models for waiting list prioritization in LT. GEMA-AI made more accurate predictions of waiting list outcomes, particularly for the sickest patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的肝脏分配性别平等模型(GEMA-AI)用于肝移植等待名单优先排序。
背景与目的:我们旨在开发和验证人工智能评分(GEMA-AI),以使用现有模型中包含的相同输入变量预测肝移植(LT)等待名单结果。方法:队列研究,包括在英国(2010-2020)招募的成年LT候选人进行模型训练和内部验证,在澳大利亚(1998-2020)招募进行外部验证。GEMA-AI在一个可解释的人工神经网络中结合了国际标准化比率、胆红素、钠和皇家自由肾小球滤过率。将GEMA-AI与GEMA-Na、MELD 3.0和MELD- na进行等候名单优先排序的比较。结果:共纳入9320例患者:训练队列n= 5762例,内部验证队列n= 1920例,外部验证队列n= 1638例。在不同的队列中,90天死亡率或因疾病退市的患病率在5.3%-6%之间。在内部和外部验证队列中,GEMA-AI表现出比GEMA-Na、MELD- na和MELD 3.0更好的辨别能力,在女性和至少表现出一个极端分析值的患者中具有更明显的益处。考虑到相同的输入变量,从线性到非线性评分(从GEMA-Na到GEMA-AI)的转换导致前90天内6.4%的患者优先级差异,并可能挽救59例死亡中的1例,以及13例女性死亡中的1例。当腹水不包括在模型中时,结果没有实质性的变化。结论:使用可解释的机器学习模型可能比传统的基于回归的模型更适合lt的等候名单优先级。GEMA-AI对等候名单结果的预测更准确,特别是对病情最严重的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
Is enteroscopy alone adequate for assessment of mucosal healing in proximal ileum? Response to Letter to Editor. Re: Oral Contraceptives and Risk of GERD and Related Esophageal Outcomes - A Cautionary Tale of Hormonal Exposures in Large Database Networks. Segmental Histologic Variability in MASLD/MASH: A Call to Quantify Reliability in Biopsy-Based Trial Endpoints. Subcutaneous Infliximab and Assumptions of Response in Ileal Crohn's Disease: Does Route of Administration Matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1