Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound of the posterior fatpad in elbow fractures.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2024-214448
Svenja L Haak, Thea van der Veen, Renate Stolmeijer, Annemieke E Boendermaker, Brigitta Britt Ym van der Kolk, Jan C Ter Maaten, Ewoud Ter Avest, Heleen Lameijer
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound of the posterior fatpad in elbow fractures.","authors":"Svenja L Haak, Thea van der Veen, Renate Stolmeijer, Annemieke E Boendermaker, Brigitta Britt Ym van der Kolk, Jan C Ter Maaten, Ewoud Ter Avest, Heleen Lameijer","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially be used in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. However, the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS performed by non-radiologists for the exclusion of elbow fractures is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of POCUS of the posterior fatpad performed by non-radiologists in the workup of adult patients presenting with elbow injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre, prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in four EDs to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS to demonstrate or exclude an elbow fracture in patients presenting with elbow injuries to the ED. The study population consisted of a convenience sample. In patients ≥16 years of age with an elbow injury for which an X-ray was ordered, POCUS was performed by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. POCUS (index test) results were compared with X-ray outcomes (reference standard) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 215 patients were included, 143 (67%) of whom had a fracture confirmed on X-ray. POCUS was positive based on a visualised elevated posterior fatpad in 127 (59%) patients. An elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CIs 85% to 95%), a specificity of 93% (95% CI 85% to 98%), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.16) and a positive likelihood ratio of 13.09 (95% CI 5.61 to 30.54) for the presence of an elbow fracture. Post hoc review of the images by expert sonographers improved sensitivity to 96% (95% CI 91% to 99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS of the posterior fatpad is a promising adjunct to physical examination to determine the need for further diagnostic studies in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. Sensitivity after a limited training is high, but not perfect, and can likely further be improved with additional training.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"300-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially be used in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. However, the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS performed by non-radiologists for the exclusion of elbow fractures is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of POCUS of the posterior fatpad performed by non-radiologists in the workup of adult patients presenting with elbow injuries.

Methods: A multicentre, prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in four EDs to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS to demonstrate or exclude an elbow fracture in patients presenting with elbow injuries to the ED. The study population consisted of a convenience sample. In patients ≥16 years of age with an elbow injury for which an X-ray was ordered, POCUS was performed by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. POCUS (index test) results were compared with X-ray outcomes (reference standard) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS.

Results: A total of 215 patients were included, 143 (67%) of whom had a fracture confirmed on X-ray. POCUS was positive based on a visualised elevated posterior fatpad in 127 (59%) patients. An elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CIs 85% to 95%), a specificity of 93% (95% CI 85% to 98%), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.16) and a positive likelihood ratio of 13.09 (95% CI 5.61 to 30.54) for the presence of an elbow fracture. Post hoc review of the images by expert sonographers improved sensitivity to 96% (95% CI 91% to 99%).

Conclusion: POCUS of the posterior fatpad is a promising adjunct to physical examination to determine the need for further diagnostic studies in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. Sensitivity after a limited training is high, but not perfect, and can likely further be improved with additional training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手肘骨折后脂肪垫即时超声诊断的准确性。
背景:即时超声(POCUS)可用于肘部损伤患者的分类。然而,非放射科医师使用POCUS排除肘关节骨折的诊断准确性尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨由非放射科医师对成年肘部损伤患者进行后外侧脂肪垫POCUS的诊断潜力。方法:在2021年1月至2022年8月期间,在4个急诊科进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,以确定POCUS上抬高的后部fatpad的诊断准确性,以证明或排除肘部损伤的急诊科患者肘部骨折。研究人群由方便样本组成。对于年龄≥16岁的肘部损伤且要求进行x光检查的患者,POCUS由接受过超声培训的急诊医生进行。将POCUS(指数试验)结果与x线结果(参考标准)进行比较,以确定POCUS诊断的准确性。结果:共纳入215例患者,其中x线确诊骨折143例(67%)。127例(59%)患者POCUS呈阳性,显示后部脂肪垫升高。后路脂肪垫升高对POCUS的敏感性为91% (95% CI为85%至95%),特异性为93% (95% CI为85%至98%),肘部骨折存在的阴性似然比为0.10 (95% CI为0.06至0.16),阳性似然比为13.09 (95% CI为5.61至30.54)。由超声专家对图像进行事后复查,将灵敏度提高到96% (95% CI 91% ~ 99%)。结论:在肘关节损伤患者的分诊中,后侧脂肪垫POCUS是一种很有希望的辅助体检,以确定是否需要进一步的诊断研究。在有限的训练后,灵敏度是很高的,但不是完美的,并且可能通过额外的训练进一步提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
From triage to transformation: tackling inequalities in emergency care through a public health lens. Refocusing peer review on science rather than formatting requirements. Prehospital management of acute behavioural disturbance: managing severe agitation in the prehospital setting - a systematic literature review. Modifiers of the effectiveness of point-of-care troponin testing and determinants of concordance between diagnostic pathway recommendations and disposition in patients with chest pain: a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Exploring public information needs on resuscitation: an artificial intelligence-assisted content analysis of questions posted online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1