Validation the modified subjective global nutrition assessment (mSGNA) for assessing malnutrition among hospitalized children

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Early human development Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2025.106201
Thi Thu Lieu Nguyen , Thi Mai Anh Than , Ha Anh Nguyen , Thu Huyen Doan , Thi Thanh Xuan Le , Thi Huong Le , Thi My Thuc Luu
{"title":"Validation the modified subjective global nutrition assessment (mSGNA) for assessing malnutrition among hospitalized children","authors":"Thi Thu Lieu Nguyen ,&nbsp;Thi Mai Anh Than ,&nbsp;Ha Anh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Thu Huyen Doan ,&nbsp;Thi Thanh Xuan Le ,&nbsp;Thi Huong Le ,&nbsp;Thi My Thuc Luu","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2025.106201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To validate a modified Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (mSGNA) for assessing nutritional status among Vietnamese children.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Children's Hospital in Vietnam, where 200 children were assessed using mSGNA, Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA), and a standardized method developed by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mSGNA showed high accuracy with 82.9 % sensitivity and 90.8 % specificity when compared to SGNA, and moderate accuracy (72.0 % sensitivity, 77.3 % specificity) against AND/ASPEN. The kappa value for mSGNA-SGNA agreement was 0.8 (95 % CI 0.686–0.849), indicating substantial agreement, while the kappa value for mSGNA-AND/ASPEN agreement was 0.5 (95%CI 0.304–0.567), reflecting moderate agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results suggest that mSGNA is a reliable tool for identifying malnutrition in Vietnamese pediatric patients, with high sensitivity and specificity in comparison to SGNA and moderate effectiveness against AND/ASPEN standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 106201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378225000118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To validate a modified Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (mSGNA) for assessing nutritional status among Vietnamese children.

Study design

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Children's Hospital in Vietnam, where 200 children were assessed using mSGNA, Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA), and a standardized method developed by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN).

Results

The mSGNA showed high accuracy with 82.9 % sensitivity and 90.8 % specificity when compared to SGNA, and moderate accuracy (72.0 % sensitivity, 77.3 % specificity) against AND/ASPEN. The kappa value for mSGNA-SGNA agreement was 0.8 (95 % CI 0.686–0.849), indicating substantial agreement, while the kappa value for mSGNA-AND/ASPEN agreement was 0.5 (95%CI 0.304–0.567), reflecting moderate agreement.

Conclusions

The results suggest that mSGNA is a reliable tool for identifying malnutrition in Vietnamese pediatric patients, with high sensitivity and specificity in comparison to SGNA and moderate effectiveness against AND/ASPEN standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修正主观整体营养评估(mSGNA)评估住院儿童营养不良的有效性。
目的:验证改进的主观全球营养评估(mSGNA)评估越南儿童的营养状况。研究设计:在越南国立儿童医院进行了一项横断面研究,其中200名儿童使用mSGNA、主观全球营养评估(SGNA)和由营养与饮食学会(and)和美国肠外和肠内营养学会(ASPEN)开发的标准化方法进行评估。结果:与SGNA相比,mSGNA对and /ASPEN具有较高的准确性(敏感性为82.9%,特异性为90.8%),对and /ASPEN具有中等的准确性(敏感性为72.0%,特异性为77.3%)。mSGNA-SGNA一致的kappa值为0.8 (95%CI 0.886 -0.849),表示基本一致,而mSGNA-AND/ASPEN一致的kappa值为0.5 (95%CI 0.304-0.567),表示中等一致。结论:结果表明mSGNA是鉴别越南儿科患者营养不良的可靠工具,与SGNA相比具有高敏感性和特异性,与and /ASPEN标准相比具有中等有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
期刊最新文献
Beyond maternal weight: Independent contributions of paternal and maternal obesity to fetal macrosomia in a Peruvian nationwide survey Kinematic modulation across the ontogenetic transition to active social engagement Retinopathy of prematurity: Moving beyond oxygen The relationship between digit ratio (2D:4D) and autoimmune diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis Hydrocortisone for evolving respiratory failure in preterm infants: predictors of treatment failure and associations with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1