Treatment Options for Buerger Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.034
Ramin Shekouhi, Mohammed Mumtaz, Humza Naqvi, Armina Azizi, Kristina M Crawford, Benjamin N Jacobs, Harvey Chim
{"title":"Treatment Options for Buerger Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.","authors":"Ramin Shekouhi, Mohammed Mumtaz, Humza Naqvi, Armina Azizi, Kristina M Crawford, Benjamin N Jacobs, Harvey Chim","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Uncertainties exist regarding the optimal management strategy for patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TAOs). The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of common interventions used for treating patients with TAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Endovascular treatment, revascularization, sympathectomy, stem cell therapy (SCT), and nonsurgical interventions were selected for inclusion in the study. Changes in mean visual analogue scale score and ankle brachial index (ABI) values were evaluated. In addition, the rate of ulcer healing, postintervention amputation, and overall complication rates were compared across interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1262 TAO patients (1159 males, 84 females), with a mean age of 38.4 ± 7.8 ys, were included in this systematic review. With an amputation rate of 16.6%, the endovascular treatment group showed statistically significant improvements in mean ABI and visual analogue scale scores (P < 0.05). There was a greater increase in ABI postoperatively with endovascular treatment compared to SCT (P < 0.05), and also a greater increase in ABI postoperatively with revascularization compared to SCT (P < 0.05). Meta-regression showed that both endovascular treatment and open surgical revascularization were superior to stem cell treatment for postoperative mean ABI improvement (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the rate of postoperative amputation was lower in the SCT group compared with the other two interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that all three interventions may be a reasonable therapeutic option for TAO. Endovascular intervention and open revascularization demonstrated superior outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"371-381"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Uncertainties exist regarding the optimal management strategy for patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TAOs). The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of common interventions used for treating patients with TAO.

Methods: Endovascular treatment, revascularization, sympathectomy, stem cell therapy (SCT), and nonsurgical interventions were selected for inclusion in the study. Changes in mean visual analogue scale score and ankle brachial index (ABI) values were evaluated. In addition, the rate of ulcer healing, postintervention amputation, and overall complication rates were compared across interventions.

Results: A total of 1262 TAO patients (1159 males, 84 females), with a mean age of 38.4 ± 7.8 ys, were included in this systematic review. With an amputation rate of 16.6%, the endovascular treatment group showed statistically significant improvements in mean ABI and visual analogue scale scores (P < 0.05). There was a greater increase in ABI postoperatively with endovascular treatment compared to SCT (P < 0.05), and also a greater increase in ABI postoperatively with revascularization compared to SCT (P < 0.05). Meta-regression showed that both endovascular treatment and open surgical revascularization were superior to stem cell treatment for postoperative mean ABI improvement (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the rate of postoperative amputation was lower in the SCT group compared with the other two interventions.

Conclusions: Our results indicated that all three interventions may be a reasonable therapeutic option for TAO. Endovascular intervention and open revascularization demonstrated superior outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Reducing Postoperative Opioids in Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study. A Review of Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Using Extended Criteria Donors in the United States. Classification Systems of Surgical Complexity: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Recognizing the Need for Goals of Care Conversations Among Critically Ill Surgical Patients. Immunological Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Conversion Surgery Cases for Gastric Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1