Vasileios Giannopapas, Vassiliki Smyrni, Dimitrios K Kitsos, Maria Ioanna Stefanou, Aikaterini Theodorou, John S Tzartos, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Sotirios Giannopoulos
{"title":"Cancer in multiple sclerosis patients following prolonged exposure to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs): a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Vasileios Giannopapas, Vassiliki Smyrni, Dimitrios K Kitsos, Maria Ioanna Stefanou, Aikaterini Theodorou, John S Tzartos, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Sotirios Giannopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12882-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The current literature on the prevalence and potential association between disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and cancer risk in the MS population has yielded mixed findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to estimate cancer prevalence and cancer risk in patients with MS (PwMS) under prolonged DMT exposure. Database search include: MEDLINE PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 studies involving 333,779 PwMS were included, reporting cancer events over periods ranging from 6 to 32 years. The aggregated pooled prevalence of cancer events in MS patients receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) was 3.8% (95% CI 2.6, 5.2%), with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 99.7%, p = 0). Two studies compared cancer events in MS patients who received DMTs versus those who did not. The relative risk of cancer associated with DMTs was 0.8 (95% CI 0.59-1.31, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.6%, p = 0.53), indicating no significant increase in cancer risk due to DMTs. Breast and basal cell carcinomas had a high prevalence (18.4% and 11.3, respectively) in PwMS under DMTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reports a 3.8% pooled prevalence of cancer in PwMS receiving DMTs. The findings of this study suggest that DMTs alone do not increase cancer risk in PwMS. Breast cancer and basal cell carcinoma had the highest prevalence among the different types of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 2","pages":"162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12882-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The current literature on the prevalence and potential association between disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and cancer risk in the MS population has yielded mixed findings.
Methods: This study aimed to estimate cancer prevalence and cancer risk in patients with MS (PwMS) under prolonged DMT exposure. Database search include: MEDLINE PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar.
Results: A total of 13 studies involving 333,779 PwMS were included, reporting cancer events over periods ranging from 6 to 32 years. The aggregated pooled prevalence of cancer events in MS patients receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) was 3.8% (95% CI 2.6, 5.2%), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 99.7%, p = 0). Two studies compared cancer events in MS patients who received DMTs versus those who did not. The relative risk of cancer associated with DMTs was 0.8 (95% CI 0.59-1.31, I2 = 93.6%, p = 0.53), indicating no significant increase in cancer risk due to DMTs. Breast and basal cell carcinomas had a high prevalence (18.4% and 11.3, respectively) in PwMS under DMTs.
Conclusion: This study reports a 3.8% pooled prevalence of cancer in PwMS receiving DMTs. The findings of this study suggest that DMTs alone do not increase cancer risk in PwMS. Breast cancer and basal cell carcinoma had the highest prevalence among the different types of cancer.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.