Feasibility of self-investment in a medically tailored meals program by a large health enterprise: Cleveland Clinic experience.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and health Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1177/02601060241307980
Eliot N Haddad, Rosemary Miles, Marilyn Alejandro-Rodriguez, Maria P Gorenflo, Ainiwaer Misirang, Salvatore Barbarotta, Wendy Phillips, Nazleen Bharmal, Monica Yepes-Rios
{"title":"Feasibility of self-investment in a medically tailored meals program by a large health enterprise: Cleveland Clinic experience.","authors":"Eliot N Haddad, Rosemary Miles, Marilyn Alejandro-Rodriguez, Maria P Gorenflo, Ainiwaer Misirang, Salvatore Barbarotta, Wendy Phillips, Nazleen Bharmal, Monica Yepes-Rios","doi":"10.1177/02601060241307980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Medically tailored meals (MTMs) are personalized meals designed to meet the therapeutic needs of patients with chronic diseases. Most MTM programs rely on philanthropic support, and the optimal parameters for these programs are not well-defined. <b>Aim:</b> To assess the feasibility of an MTM program developed by a major healthcare institution using internal investments and an online platform for meal ordering. <b>Methods:</b> Single-arm prospective cohort feasibility MTM project implemented between August 2021 and June 2022. Each participant received 14 frozen meals per week over 3 months via a courier system. Participants answered several questionnaires and healthcare utilization was abstracted from electronic medical records up to 6 months post-intervention. <b>Results:</b> Sixty participants were enrolled. Emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient days significantly decreased in the 180 days post-intervention compared to the 180 days pre-intervention (ED visits: 1.2 vs 1.7, <i>P</i> = 0.005; inpatient days: 3.2 vs 5.1, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Participants saved an average of $12,046 in healthcare costs. Despite challenges with implementation, including upfront costs and sustainability, client and service outcomes were highly favorable. Patients were overwhelmingly satisfied with the program, although there was no quantitative improvement in global mental health (GMH) or global physical health (GPH) scores. <b>Conclusion:</b> MTM programs run by healthcare institutions can enhance patient satisfaction, reduce hospital visits, and lower healthcare costs, particularly for vulnerable populations. Providing healthy, frozen meals over an extended period is feasible, though it requires significant initial investment. Large healthcare institutions should consider implementing such programs to prioritize primary prevention in the US healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060241307980"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241307980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medically tailored meals (MTMs) are personalized meals designed to meet the therapeutic needs of patients with chronic diseases. Most MTM programs rely on philanthropic support, and the optimal parameters for these programs are not well-defined. Aim: To assess the feasibility of an MTM program developed by a major healthcare institution using internal investments and an online platform for meal ordering. Methods: Single-arm prospective cohort feasibility MTM project implemented between August 2021 and June 2022. Each participant received 14 frozen meals per week over 3 months via a courier system. Participants answered several questionnaires and healthcare utilization was abstracted from electronic medical records up to 6 months post-intervention. Results: Sixty participants were enrolled. Emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient days significantly decreased in the 180 days post-intervention compared to the 180 days pre-intervention (ED visits: 1.2 vs 1.7, P = 0.005; inpatient days: 3.2 vs 5.1, P = 0.02). Participants saved an average of $12,046 in healthcare costs. Despite challenges with implementation, including upfront costs and sustainability, client and service outcomes were highly favorable. Patients were overwhelmingly satisfied with the program, although there was no quantitative improvement in global mental health (GMH) or global physical health (GPH) scores. Conclusion: MTM programs run by healthcare institutions can enhance patient satisfaction, reduce hospital visits, and lower healthcare costs, particularly for vulnerable populations. Providing healthy, frozen meals over an extended period is feasible, though it requires significant initial investment. Large healthcare institutions should consider implementing such programs to prioritize primary prevention in the US healthcare system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
The associations of obesity with demographic and lifestyle factors among Hong Kong adults. Effect of caffeine supplementation on physical performance in a 5 km cycling time trial of healthy young adult women in different phases of the menstrual cycle: A parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Anthropometry, body composition, somatotype and asymmetry of canoe sprint world champion: A case study. Examining the influence of diet on auditory working memory in females. Eating to live well-Or worse? The role of vegan and vegetarian diets in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1