Recent Advancements in Robotic-assisted Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006476
Kazuho Kawashima, Shadi Ghali, Dariush Nikkhah, Ali Esmaeili
{"title":"Recent Advancements in Robotic-assisted Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Kazuho Kawashima, Shadi Ghali, Dariush Nikkhah, Ali Esmaeili","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a delayed, yet steady uptake of robotic-assisted surgery over the past decade within the field of plastic surgery. In an era of rapidly evolving scientific and technological development, there is a need for an update on the current literature for robotic-assisted plastic surgery procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted across major databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and Central for published literature from March 2023 to December 2024. Only published articles written in English with full texts were considered for the final narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, we identified 1200 articles in the database search. Subsequently, 46 articles were included in our final narrative synthesis. Among the selected studies, 4 focused on reconstruction in transoral robotic surgery, 14 on breast surgery, 10 on robotic microsurgery, 5 on abdominal wall reconstruction, 6 on vaginoplasty, and 5 on flap harvest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence to support the advantage of robotic plastic surgery procedures over traditional methods is relatively weak. However, there have been some advancements, specifically in transoral robotic surgery, robotic mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. Nevertheless, comprehensive exploration and prospective randomized trials are essential across all procedures to define the role of surgical robots in plastic surgery. The impediments to wider adoption include high costs, disruption to operative flow, and the absence of haptic feedback in robotic-assisted procedures within the specialty.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 1","pages":"e6476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been a delayed, yet steady uptake of robotic-assisted surgery over the past decade within the field of plastic surgery. In an era of rapidly evolving scientific and technological development, there is a need for an update on the current literature for robotic-assisted plastic surgery procedures.

Methods: Searches were conducted across major databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and Central for published literature from March 2023 to December 2024. Only published articles written in English with full texts were considered for the final narrative synthesis.

Results: Initially, we identified 1200 articles in the database search. Subsequently, 46 articles were included in our final narrative synthesis. Among the selected studies, 4 focused on reconstruction in transoral robotic surgery, 14 on breast surgery, 10 on robotic microsurgery, 5 on abdominal wall reconstruction, 6 on vaginoplasty, and 5 on flap harvest.

Conclusions: The evidence to support the advantage of robotic plastic surgery procedures over traditional methods is relatively weak. However, there have been some advancements, specifically in transoral robotic surgery, robotic mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. Nevertheless, comprehensive exploration and prospective randomized trials are essential across all procedures to define the role of surgical robots in plastic surgery. The impediments to wider adoption include high costs, disruption to operative flow, and the absence of haptic feedback in robotic-assisted procedures within the specialty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助整形手术的最新进展:系统综述。
背景:在过去的十年里,在整形外科领域,机器人辅助手术的应用一直在推迟,但却在稳步发展。在科学技术快速发展的时代,有必要对机器人辅助整形手术的现有文献进行更新。方法:检索主要数据库,包括MEDLINE、Embase和Central,检索2023年3月至2024年12月发表的文献。只有已发表的英文全文文章才被考虑用于最后的叙述综合。结果:最初,我们在数据库搜索中确定了1200篇文章。随后,46篇文章被纳入我们最后的叙事综合。在入选的研究中,有4项是经口机器人手术的重建,14项是乳房手术,10项是机器人显微手术,5项是腹壁重建,6项是阴道成型术,5项是皮瓣收获。结论:支持机器人整形手术优于传统方法的证据相对较弱。然而,也有一些进步,特别是在经口机器人手术,机器人乳房切除术和乳房重建。然而,全面的探索和前瞻性随机试验对于确定外科手术机器人在整形手术中的作用至关重要。广泛采用的障碍包括高成本,手术流程中断,以及在专业机器人辅助手术中缺乏触觉反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
Effects of New Cellular Treatment Factor and Human Exosome Injection on Intact Skin Regeneration in a Randomized In Vivo Study. Systematic Approach to the Management of Neuropathic Groin Pain: A 20-year Retrospective Cohort Study. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Wartime Amputation: A Review of Pediatric Literature and Feasibility in Current Conflicts. The (Hidden) World of Wide-awake Office Surgery. Comparative Outcomes of Traditional Versus Endoscopic Brow Lift Techniques: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1