Analysis of orthopaedic private healthcare patterns in England: A potential emerging two-tier system

IF 1.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100578
Lucy McCann , Ian Holdroyd , Rowan Emberson , Helena Painter , John Ford
{"title":"Analysis of orthopaedic private healthcare patterns in England: A potential emerging two-tier system","authors":"Lucy McCann ,&nbsp;Ian Holdroyd ,&nbsp;Rowan Emberson ,&nbsp;Helena Painter ,&nbsp;John Ford","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Private healthcare is a rapidly growing industry in the UK, particularly for surgical procedures, due to extensive waiting times in publicly funded health care. The NHS also commissions private healthcare to provide procedures for NHS patients to alleviate waiting times. We aimed to explore the trends and geographical variations between the North and South of England in privately funded and NHS-funded privately delivered orthopaedic procedures compared to NHS waiting times.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A longitudinal study using quarterly national data between 2019 and 2023 in England.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed orthopaedic surgical volumes per 10,000 people using Private Healthcare Information Network data in England from 2019 to 2023 and compared them with waiting times in publicly funded health care provided by the NHS. We stratified by geographical location and time period to compare the North-South divide in England.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The south of England performed almost double the number of privately funded procedures (23 vs 12/10,000), but there were fewer NHS-funded private procedures (40 vs 45/10,000). The north of England has consistently shorter waiting times than the South, with considerable variation across regions. London had fewer NHS-funded procedures compared to other regions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The time-trend patterns indicate considerable geographical inequalities of access to orthopaedic private healthcare between regions within England, with a potential emergence of a two-tier healthcare system. Relying on the private sector to reduce waiting lists, without oversight, may exacerbate regional and socioeconomic differences. Policymakers should consider how the unequal distribution of funding and NHS-funded procedures could perpetuate inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224001150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Private healthcare is a rapidly growing industry in the UK, particularly for surgical procedures, due to extensive waiting times in publicly funded health care. The NHS also commissions private healthcare to provide procedures for NHS patients to alleviate waiting times. We aimed to explore the trends and geographical variations between the North and South of England in privately funded and NHS-funded privately delivered orthopaedic procedures compared to NHS waiting times.

Study design

A longitudinal study using quarterly national data between 2019 and 2023 in England.

Methods

We analysed orthopaedic surgical volumes per 10,000 people using Private Healthcare Information Network data in England from 2019 to 2023 and compared them with waiting times in publicly funded health care provided by the NHS. We stratified by geographical location and time period to compare the North-South divide in England.

Results

The south of England performed almost double the number of privately funded procedures (23 vs 12/10,000), but there were fewer NHS-funded private procedures (40 vs 45/10,000). The north of England has consistently shorter waiting times than the South, with considerable variation across regions. London had fewer NHS-funded procedures compared to other regions.

Conclusions

The time-trend patterns indicate considerable geographical inequalities of access to orthopaedic private healthcare between regions within England, with a potential emergence of a two-tier healthcare system. Relying on the private sector to reduce waiting lists, without oversight, may exacerbate regional and socioeconomic differences. Policymakers should consider how the unequal distribution of funding and NHS-funded procedures could perpetuate inequalities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析骨科私人医疗模式在英格兰:一个潜在的新兴双层系统。
目标:私人医疗保健是一个快速增长的行业在英国,特别是外科手术,由于长时间的等待在公共资助的医疗保健。国民保健制度还委托私人保健机构为国民保健制度的病人提供程序,以减少等待时间。我们的目的是探索英格兰北部和南部在私人资助和NHS资助的私人提供的骨科手术与NHS等待时间之间的趋势和地理差异。研究设计:一项纵向研究,使用英国2019年至2023年的季度国家数据。方法:我们使用英国2019年至2023年的私人医疗保健信息网络数据分析了每10,000人的骨科手术量,并将其与NHS提供的公共资助医疗保健的等待时间进行了比较。我们按地理位置和时期进行分层,以比较英格兰的南北差异。结果:英格兰南部的私人资助手术数量几乎翻了一番(23对12/10,000),但nhs资助的私人手术数量较少(40对45/10,000)。英格兰北部的等待时间一直比南部短,各地区差异很大。与其他地区相比,伦敦有较少的nhs资助的程序。结论:时间趋势模式表明相当大的地理不平等获得骨科私人医疗保健之间的地区在英格兰,潜在的两层医疗保健系统的出现。在没有监督的情况下,依靠私营部门减少等候名单可能会加剧地区和社会经济差异。政策制定者应考虑资金分配不均和nhs资助程序如何可能使不平等永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Short and disrupted sleep is related to perceptions of neighborhood in pregnant African American women of low socioeconomic status Utilising unsupervised machine learning to predict outbreaks of respiratory tract infections in acute Irish hospitals (2016-2021) A propensity score-matched study including 250,000 patients with Factor V Leiden shows significantly increased mortality in comparison with individuals without thrombophilia How can integrated neighbourhood teams (INTs) tackle health and care inequalities? A policy evidence brief Mobilizing community assets to address health equity: Evaluation of the Communities Organizing to Promote Equity (COPE) project in Kansas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1