Analysis of orthopaedic private healthcare patterns in England: A potential emerging two-tier system

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100578
Lucy McCann , Ian Holdroyd , Rowan Emberson , Helena Painter , John Ford
{"title":"Analysis of orthopaedic private healthcare patterns in England: A potential emerging two-tier system","authors":"Lucy McCann ,&nbsp;Ian Holdroyd ,&nbsp;Rowan Emberson ,&nbsp;Helena Painter ,&nbsp;John Ford","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Private healthcare is a rapidly growing industry in the UK, particularly for surgical procedures, due to extensive waiting times in publicly funded health care. The NHS also commissions private healthcare to provide procedures for NHS patients to alleviate waiting times. We aimed to explore the trends and geographical variations between the North and South of England in privately funded and NHS-funded privately delivered orthopaedic procedures compared to NHS waiting times.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A longitudinal study using quarterly national data between 2019 and 2023 in England.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed orthopaedic surgical volumes per 10,000 people using Private Healthcare Information Network data in England from 2019 to 2023 and compared them with waiting times in publicly funded health care provided by the NHS. We stratified by geographical location and time period to compare the North-South divide in England.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The south of England performed almost double the number of privately funded procedures (23 vs 12/10,000), but there were fewer NHS-funded private procedures (40 vs 45/10,000). The north of England has consistently shorter waiting times than the South, with considerable variation across regions. London had fewer NHS-funded procedures compared to other regions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The time-trend patterns indicate considerable geographical inequalities of access to orthopaedic private healthcare between regions within England, with a potential emergence of a two-tier healthcare system. Relying on the private sector to reduce waiting lists, without oversight, may exacerbate regional and socioeconomic differences. Policymakers should consider how the unequal distribution of funding and NHS-funded procedures could perpetuate inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224001150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Private healthcare is a rapidly growing industry in the UK, particularly for surgical procedures, due to extensive waiting times in publicly funded health care. The NHS also commissions private healthcare to provide procedures for NHS patients to alleviate waiting times. We aimed to explore the trends and geographical variations between the North and South of England in privately funded and NHS-funded privately delivered orthopaedic procedures compared to NHS waiting times.

Study design

A longitudinal study using quarterly national data between 2019 and 2023 in England.

Methods

We analysed orthopaedic surgical volumes per 10,000 people using Private Healthcare Information Network data in England from 2019 to 2023 and compared them with waiting times in publicly funded health care provided by the NHS. We stratified by geographical location and time period to compare the North-South divide in England.

Results

The south of England performed almost double the number of privately funded procedures (23 vs 12/10,000), but there were fewer NHS-funded private procedures (40 vs 45/10,000). The north of England has consistently shorter waiting times than the South, with considerable variation across regions. London had fewer NHS-funded procedures compared to other regions.

Conclusions

The time-trend patterns indicate considerable geographical inequalities of access to orthopaedic private healthcare between regions within England, with a potential emergence of a two-tier healthcare system. Relying on the private sector to reduce waiting lists, without oversight, may exacerbate regional and socioeconomic differences. Policymakers should consider how the unequal distribution of funding and NHS-funded procedures could perpetuate inequalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer in Brazil: An Analysis of a Private Healthcare System Database.
IF 5.2 World Journal of OncologyPub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.14740/wjon1476
Mariane S Fontes, Fabio A Schutz, Murilo de Almeida Luz, Giovanni Bomfim, Luciana Tarbes Mattana Saturnino, Sarah Carolina Goncalves, Roberto Soler
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Leading the next pandemics Spatiotemporal patterns of influenza in Western Australia Missed opportunities: Public health messaging in media coverage of drug seizures A Canadian multi-province study of COVID-19 vaccine coverage along area-level social determinants in 2021 An analysis of systemic incident investigation methodologies applied in serious injury or fatality events: A rapid systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1