Patient “No-Show” Prior to Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Increases Risk of Postoperative Anemia

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101602
Jeffrey S. Mun BA , Matthew W. Parry MD, MS , Alex Tang MD , Jesse J. Manikowski MS , Cory Crinella PA-C , John J. Mercuri MD, MA
{"title":"Patient “No-Show” Prior to Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Increases Risk of Postoperative Anemia","authors":"Jeffrey S. Mun BA ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Parry MD, MS ,&nbsp;Alex Tang MD ,&nbsp;Jesse J. Manikowski MS ,&nbsp;Cory Crinella PA-C ,&nbsp;John J. Mercuri MD, MA","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients who “no-show” (NS) clinical appointments are at a higher risk of poor healthcare outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate and characterize the relationship between patient NS prior to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 90-day complication risk after THA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 4147 patients undergoing primary THA. Patients were divided based on whether they NS at least 1 appointment vs always attend (AA) appointments. Information collected included number of NS and attended appointments, demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day postoperative complications. Regression analyses were run to identify relationships between NS status and postoperative outcomes, as well as factors that would predict NS status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to AA patients, NS patients had an increased odds of a postoperative complication (odds ratio:1.3, <em>P</em> = .0005), specifically postoperative anemia (odds ratio: 1.3, <em>P</em> = .0004). When comparing NS and AA patients who both experienced postoperative anemia-related complications, the NS patients had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss compared to AA patients (mean ± standard deviation: 412.6 mL ± 310.2 vs 357.3 mL ± 269.0, <em>P</em> = .028). NS patients also had a greater rate of symptomatic anemia compared to AA patients (100 [3%] vs 25 cases [2%], <em>P</em> = .018). Age, smoking status, gender, race, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and insurance status were independent predictors of missing clinical appointments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was an increased risk for complications, specifically anemia-related complications, in THA patients who NS preoperatively. Demographic factors were independently associated with higher odds of missing a scheduled clinical appointment. The results suggest orthopedic surgeons should consider NS data to pre-emptively assess risk for complications following THA.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients who “no-show” (NS) clinical appointments are at a higher risk of poor healthcare outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate and characterize the relationship between patient NS prior to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 90-day complication risk after THA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 4147 patients undergoing primary THA. Patients were divided based on whether they NS at least 1 appointment vs always attend (AA) appointments. Information collected included number of NS and attended appointments, demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day postoperative complications. Regression analyses were run to identify relationships between NS status and postoperative outcomes, as well as factors that would predict NS status.

Results

Compared to AA patients, NS patients had an increased odds of a postoperative complication (odds ratio:1.3, P = .0005), specifically postoperative anemia (odds ratio: 1.3, P = .0004). When comparing NS and AA patients who both experienced postoperative anemia-related complications, the NS patients had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss compared to AA patients (mean ± standard deviation: 412.6 mL ± 310.2 vs 357.3 mL ± 269.0, P = .028). NS patients also had a greater rate of symptomatic anemia compared to AA patients (100 [3%] vs 25 cases [2%], P = .018). Age, smoking status, gender, race, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and insurance status were independent predictors of missing clinical appointments.

Conclusions

There was an increased risk for complications, specifically anemia-related complications, in THA patients who NS preoperatively. Demographic factors were independently associated with higher odds of missing a scheduled clinical appointment. The results suggest orthopedic surgeons should consider NS data to pre-emptively assess risk for complications following THA.

Level of Evidence

Level III.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性原发性全髋关节置换术前患者“缺席”增加术后贫血的风险。
背景:“未到”(NS)临床预约的患者出现不良医疗结果的风险较高。本研究的目的是评估和描述原发性全髋关节置换术(THA)前患者NS与THA后90天并发症风险之间的关系。方法:我们回顾性分析了4147例行原发性THA的患者。根据患者是否至少进行一次预约与始终参加(AA)预约进行分组。收集的信息包括NS数量和参加的预约、人口统计学、合并症和90天术后并发症。进行回归分析以确定NS状态与术后预后之间的关系,以及预测NS状态的因素。结果:与AA患者相比,NS患者术后并发症的发生率增加(优势比:1.3,P = 0.0005),特别是术后贫血(优势比:1.3,P = 0.0004)。NS和AA患者术后均出现贫血相关并发症,NS患者术中出血量明显高于AA患者(平均±标准差:412.6 mL±310.2 vs 357.3 mL±269.0,P = 0.028)。NS患者的症状性贫血发生率也高于AA患者(100例[3%]vs 25例[2%],P = 0.018)。年龄、吸烟状况、性别、种族、体重指数、Charlson合并症指数和保险状况是缺席临床预约的独立预测因子。结论:THA术前NS患者出现并发症的风险增加,特别是贫血相关并发症。人口统计学因素与错过预定临床预约的较高几率独立相关。结果提示骨科医生应考虑NS数据来预先评估THA术后并发症的风险。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Brucella: Four Case Reports and a Systematic Review of Literature Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Receiving Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Agonist Therapy: A Matched Cohort Study Long-Term Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Hypoalbuminemia Following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Three-Dimensional Hands-on Total Hip Arthroplasty Simulation After Surgically Treated Acetabular Fractures: A Technical Note on 8 Cases Does Race Affect Utilization of Unicompartmental vs Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Matched Cohort Study Within a Universal Health System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1