[Efficacy and safety of microsurgery in patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures].

Bing Wang, Cheng Zhu, Ping Wang, Zi-Zheng Wu
{"title":"[Efficacy and safety of microsurgery in patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures].","authors":"Bing Wang, Cheng Zhu, Ping Wang, Zi-Zheng Wu","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of microsurgery in patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 64 patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures who were admitted to the hospital bewteen September 2018 and March 2022 were included, and divided into the observation group and the control group, with 32 cases in each one. In the observation group, there were 24 males and 8 females, aged from 29 to 42 years with an average of (36.59±3.24) years. The tibial defect ranged from 2 to 5 cm with an average of (3.41±0.61) cm, and the soft tissue defect area ranged from 34 to 76 cm2 with an average of (58.50±9.44) cm2. This group received microsurgical treatment. In the control group, there were 25 males and 7 females, aged from 27 to 44 years with an average of (37.59±3.21) years. The tibial defect ranged from 2 to 6 cm with an average of (3.59±0.80) cm, and the soft tissue defect area ranged from 36 to 78 cm2 with an average of (59.09±9.53) cm2. This group received conventional staged surgery, with plaster or brace fixation after initial debridement and appropriate internal fixation at a later stage. The Anderson scores, motor ability Fugl-Meyer scale, perioperative indicators, rehabilitation outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were followed up for a duration from 2.5 to 5.5 months with an average of (3.15±1.11) months. In the observation group, 19 patients were rated as excellent, 12 patients as good, 1 patient as fair, and no patients as poor. In the control group, 11 patients were rated as excellent, 13 patients as good, 6 patients as fair, and 2 patients as poor. The difference in outcomes between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). The operation time, the hospitalization time, and the hospitalization cost in the observation group(4.39±0.69) h, (30.22±4.58) d, and (23, 500±3, 300) yuan, respectively were significantly lower than those in the control group(5.01±0.75) h, (33.28±3.74) d, and(30, 200±5, 200) yuan, respectively (<i>P</i><0.05). Revascularization time(134.25±14.76) h, wound healing time(11.34±1.56) d, and fracture healing time(3.09±0.42) months in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group(<i>P</i><0.05) which were (189.36±22.17) h, (13.22±2.03) d and (4.02±0.57) months respectively. The motor ability(42.91±5.51) points, sensory function(46.19±3.53) points, and total Fugl-Meyer score(89.09±6.08) in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(<i>P</i><0.05) which were(35.19±4.27), (34.03±3.79), (69.22±6.32) points respectivdy. In the observation group, there were 1 case of refractory wound and 3 cases of complete nerve injury, which were lower than those in the control group (8 cases and 10 cases, respectively, <i>P</i><0.05). The number of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microsurgical technique can effectively shorten the wound and fracture healing time in patients with Gustilo Ⅲ C open fracture, improve limb movement ability, and reduce the risk of poor prognosis and complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 1","pages":"41-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of microsurgery in patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures.

Methods: A total of 64 patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures who were admitted to the hospital bewteen September 2018 and March 2022 were included, and divided into the observation group and the control group, with 32 cases in each one. In the observation group, there were 24 males and 8 females, aged from 29 to 42 years with an average of (36.59±3.24) years. The tibial defect ranged from 2 to 5 cm with an average of (3.41±0.61) cm, and the soft tissue defect area ranged from 34 to 76 cm2 with an average of (58.50±9.44) cm2. This group received microsurgical treatment. In the control group, there were 25 males and 7 females, aged from 27 to 44 years with an average of (37.59±3.21) years. The tibial defect ranged from 2 to 6 cm with an average of (3.59±0.80) cm, and the soft tissue defect area ranged from 36 to 78 cm2 with an average of (59.09±9.53) cm2. This group received conventional staged surgery, with plaster or brace fixation after initial debridement and appropriate internal fixation at a later stage. The Anderson scores, motor ability Fugl-Meyer scale, perioperative indicators, rehabilitation outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: The patients were followed up for a duration from 2.5 to 5.5 months with an average of (3.15±1.11) months. In the observation group, 19 patients were rated as excellent, 12 patients as good, 1 patient as fair, and no patients as poor. In the control group, 11 patients were rated as excellent, 13 patients as good, 6 patients as fair, and 2 patients as poor. The difference in outcomes between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The operation time, the hospitalization time, and the hospitalization cost in the observation group(4.39±0.69) h, (30.22±4.58) d, and (23, 500±3, 300) yuan, respectively were significantly lower than those in the control group(5.01±0.75) h, (33.28±3.74) d, and(30, 200±5, 200) yuan, respectively (P<0.05). Revascularization time(134.25±14.76) h, wound healing time(11.34±1.56) d, and fracture healing time(3.09±0.42) months in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05) which were (189.36±22.17) h, (13.22±2.03) d and (4.02±0.57) months respectively. The motor ability(42.91±5.51) points, sensory function(46.19±3.53) points, and total Fugl-Meyer score(89.09±6.08) in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05) which were(35.19±4.27), (34.03±3.79), (69.22±6.32) points respectivdy. In the observation group, there were 1 case of refractory wound and 3 cases of complete nerve injury, which were lower than those in the control group (8 cases and 10 cases, respectively, P<0.05). The number of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Microsurgical technique can effectively shorten the wound and fracture healing time in patients with Gustilo Ⅲ C open fracture, improve limb movement ability, and reduce the risk of poor prognosis and complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[GustiloⅢC型开放性骨折显微手术治疗的疗效和安全性]。
目的:分析显微手术治疗GustiloⅢC开放性骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选取2018年9月~ 2022年3月收治的64例GustiloⅢC型开放性骨折患者,分为观察组和对照组,各32例。观察组男性24例,女性8例,年龄29 ~ 42岁,平均(36.59±3.24)岁。胫骨缺损面积为2 ~ 5 cm,平均(3.41±0.61)cm;软组织缺损面积为34 ~ 76 cm2,平均(58.50±9.44)cm2。本组均接受显微外科治疗。对照组男性25例,女性7例,年龄27 ~ 44岁,平均(37.59±3.21)岁。胫骨缺损面积2 ~ 6 cm,平均为(3.59±0.80)cm;软组织缺损面积36 ~ 78 cm2,平均为(59.09±9.53)cm2。本组采用常规分期手术,初始清创后用石膏或支架固定,后期适当内固定。比较两组患者的安德森评分、运动能力Fugl-Meyer量表、围手术期指标、康复情况及并发症。结果:随访时间为2.5 ~ 5.5个月,平均(3.15±1.11)个月。观察组优19例,良12例,一般1例,差0例。对照组优11例,良13例,一般6例,差2例。结论:显微外科技术可有效缩短GustiloⅢC开放性骨折患者创面及骨折愈合时间,提高肢体活动能力,降低预后不良及并发症的发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
期刊最新文献
[Clinical research progress and prospects on classification-guided clinical treatment for distal 1/3 of radial fractures]. [Clinical study on fixed-platform unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with biologic femoral condylar prosthesis for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of knee joint]. [Comparison of clinical efficacy between total visual endoscopic lumbar fusion and traditional posterior fusion in the treatment of single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis]. [Advances on the treatment of the first-time patellar dislocation in children and adolescents]. [Clinical efficacy of closed reduction and elastic intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of Galeazzi fracture].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1