首页 > 最新文献

Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology最新文献

英文 中文
[Comparison of efficacy between unilateral biportal endoscopic technique and percutaneous interlaminar approach spinal endoscopic technique in the treatment of highly migrated lumbar disc herniation]. [单侧双门静脉内镜技术与经皮椎板间入路脊柱内镜技术治疗高度移位性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240963
Long Wang, Er Wang, Hai-Dong Li, Ji-Kang Min

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy(UBE) and percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic discectomy(PIED) in the treatment of highly migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients with highly migrated LDH who underwent spinal endoscopic surgery between January 2022 and December 2023. In the UBE group 22 patients included 8 males and 14 females, aged 49 to 59 years old with a mean of (54.13±2.07) years old. In the PIED group 21 patients included 11 males and 10 females, aged 49 to 59 years old with a mean of (55.04±2.80) years old. Perioperative parameters including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and fluoroscopic exposures were compared between groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. Complications during the perioperative period and follow-up were recorded.

Results: In the PIED group, there were 3 cases of nerve injury, 1 case of residual nucleus pulposus, and 1 case of dural injury. In the UBE group, there was 1 case of nerve injury and 1 case of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. No infections or major bleeding occurred in either group. All patients completed surgery and were followed up for at least 12 months. The UBE group had significantly more intraoperative blood loss (39.09±6.10) ml and more fluoroscopic exposures (6.45±0.26) than the PIED group (34.05±5.62) ml and (3.24±0.28) with significant difference (P<0.05). Preoperative VAS and ODI showed no significant differences between two groups (P>0.05). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS and ODI postoperatively (P<0.001). At the 3rd days postoperatively, the UBE group had a significantly lower leg pain VAS (2.27±0.20) than the PIED gruop(2.95±0.24) with significant difference (P<0.05), but no significant differences were observed at the first or 12th months (P>0.05). No significant differences in ODI were found between two groups during follow-up (P>0.05). At the 1st month postoperatively, according to modified MacNab criteria, 15 patients got excellent results, 4 good, and 2 fair in PIED group;and 18 patients got excellent results, 2 good, and 2 fair in UBE group, with no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion: Both PIED and UBE are effective surgical methods for treating highly migrated LDH. Compared with PIED, UBE involves slightly longer operative time, more blood loss, and more fluoroscopic exposures, but carries a lower risk of nerve injury.

目的:比较单侧双门静脉内窥镜椎间盘切除术(UBE)与经皮椎板间内窥镜椎间盘切除术(PIED)治疗高度移位性腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年12月期间行脊柱内窥镜手术的43例高度移位LDH患者。UBE组22例,男8例,女14例,年龄49 ~ 59岁,平均(54.13±2.07)岁。PIED组21例,男11例,女10例,年龄49 ~ 59岁,平均(55.04±2.80)岁。比较两组围手术期参数,包括术中出血量、手术时间和透视暴露。临床结果采用视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和修改的MacNab标准进行评估。记录围手术期并发症及随访情况。结果:PIED组神经损伤3例,髓核残留1例,硬脑膜损伤1例。UBE组神经损伤1例,脑脊液漏1例。两组均未发生感染或大出血。所有患者均完成手术并随访至少12个月。UBE组术中出血量(39.09±6.10)ml,透视暴露量(6.45±0.26)明显高于PIED组(34.05±5.62)ml和(3.24±0.28)ml,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组术后VAS和ODI均有显著改善(PPP 0.05)。随访时两组患者ODI差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后1个月,根据改良MacNab标准,PIED组15例为优,4例为良,2例为一般;UBE组优18例,良2例,一般2例,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:体外移植术和体外移植术是治疗高度迁移LDH的有效手术方法。与PIED相比,UBE的手术时间稍长,出血量较多,透视暴露较多,但神经损伤的风险较低。
{"title":"[Comparison of efficacy between unilateral biportal endoscopic technique and percutaneous interlaminar approach spinal endoscopic technique in the treatment of highly migrated lumbar disc herniation].","authors":"Long Wang, Er Wang, Hai-Dong Li, Ji-Kang Min","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240963","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy(UBE) and percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic discectomy(PIED) in the treatment of highly migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients with highly migrated LDH who underwent spinal endoscopic surgery between January 2022 and December 2023. In the UBE group 22 patients included 8 males and 14 females, aged 49 to 59 years old with a mean of (54.13±2.07) years old. In the PIED group 21 patients included 11 males and 10 females, aged 49 to 59 years old with a mean of (55.04±2.80) years old. Perioperative parameters including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and fluoroscopic exposures were compared between groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. Complications during the perioperative period and follow-up were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PIED group, there were 3 cases of nerve injury, 1 case of residual nucleus pulposus, and 1 case of dural injury. In the UBE group, there was 1 case of nerve injury and 1 case of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. No infections or major bleeding occurred in either group. All patients completed surgery and were followed up for at least 12 months. The UBE group had significantly more intraoperative blood loss (39.09±6.10) ml and more fluoroscopic exposures (6.45±0.26) than the PIED group (34.05±5.62) ml and (3.24±0.28) with significant difference (<i>P</i><0.05). Preoperative VAS and ODI showed no significant differences between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS and ODI postoperatively (<i>P</i><0.001). At the 3rd days postoperatively, the UBE group had a significantly lower leg pain VAS (2.27±0.20) than the PIED gruop(2.95±0.24) with significant difference (<i>P</i><0.05), but no significant differences were observed at the first or 12th months (<i>P</i>>0.05). No significant differences in ODI were found between two groups during follow-up (<i>P</i>>0.05). At the 1st month postoperatively, according to modified MacNab criteria, 15 patients got excellent results, 4 good, and 2 fair in PIED group;and 18 patients got excellent results, 2 good, and 2 fair in UBE group, with no significant difference between two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PIED and UBE are effective surgical methods for treating highly migrated LDH. Compared with PIED, UBE involves slightly longer operative time, more blood loss, and more fluoroscopic exposures, but carries a lower risk of nerve injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1093-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Research progress of minimally invasive decompression techniques for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis]. 【微创减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的研究进展】。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240715
Feng Yao, Zi-Long Liao, Sen-Yan Zhang, Mao Shen

The minimally invasive decompression technique represents a novel approach for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS). This method minimizes peripheral tissue damage, decreases the incidence of postoperative complications, optimizes the alleviation of nerve root compression, and expedites patient recovery. Therefore, there are various opinions on the minimally invasive decompression surgery technique for the spine both domestically and internationally today. To enable patients to select an appropriate surgical plan with optimal therapeutic outcomes, this article offers a comprehensive analysis of the advantages, disadvantages, and indications of prevalent minimally invasive spinal decompression techniques for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Additionally, it presents a comparative evaluation of the therapeutic effects associated with various minimally invasive techniques. This analysis aims to furnish a robust theoretical foundation for the clinical application of diverse minimally invasive decompression techniques in managing lumbar spinal stenosis and related conditions.

微创减压技术是治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的新方法。该方法最大限度地减少了周围组织的损伤,减少了术后并发症的发生率,优化了神经根压迫的缓解,加快了患者的恢复。因此,目前国内外对脊柱微创减压手术技术的看法不一。为了使患者能够选择合适的手术方案并获得最佳的治疗效果,本文全面分析了目前常用的微创腰椎减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的优点、缺点和适应症。此外,它还提出了与各种微创技术相关的治疗效果的比较评估。本分析旨在为临床应用多种微创减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症及相关疾病提供坚实的理论基础。
{"title":"[Research progress of minimally invasive decompression techniques for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].","authors":"Feng Yao, Zi-Long Liao, Sen-Yan Zhang, Mao Shen","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The minimally invasive decompression technique represents a novel approach for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS). This method minimizes peripheral tissue damage, decreases the incidence of postoperative complications, optimizes the alleviation of nerve root compression, and expedites patient recovery. Therefore, there are various opinions on the minimally invasive decompression surgery technique for the spine both domestically and internationally today. To enable patients to select an appropriate surgical plan with optimal therapeutic outcomes, this article offers a comprehensive analysis of the advantages, disadvantages, and indications of prevalent minimally invasive spinal decompression techniques for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Additionally, it presents a comparative evaluation of the therapeutic effects associated with various minimally invasive techniques. This analysis aims to furnish a robust theoretical foundation for the clinical application of diverse minimally invasive decompression techniques in managing lumbar spinal stenosis and related conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1182-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Research progress on the mechanism of reabsorption after massive migrated lumbar disc herniation]. [大量移位性腰椎间盘突出症后再吸收机制的研究进展]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240694
Zhen-Yu Tang, Zi-Hang Li, Ya-Hao Li, Yu-Cheng Wang, Guang-Ye Zhu, Chao Li, Hong Jiang, Peng-Fei Yu

Lumbar disc herniation refers to a syndrome mainly characterized by low back and leg pain caused by factors such as degeneration of the lumbar intervertebral disc, deterioration of the biomechanical environment, and formation of immune inflammatory reactions, which lead to the protrusion of intradiscal tissue and compression of nerves. In cases of massive migrated lumbar disc herniation, the nucleus pulposus is prolapsed and migrated, often accompanied by severe clinical symptoms and usually requiring surgical treatment. Since the phenomenon of resorption after lumbar disc herniation is discovered and proposed, relevant literature has continuously emerged. Some scholars have indicated that the resorption rate of massive migrated protrusions is higher, but its mechanism has not been fully clarified. This article reviews and summarizes the resorption mechanisms of massive migrated lumbar disc herniation in recent years. The current research contents mainly include immune inflammatory reactions, the formation of blood vessels and lymphatics, matrix metalloproteinases, dehydration, cell autophagy and apoptosis, and tension application. Based on the above mechanism theory of resorption, we believe that in the treatment of massive migrated LDH, inflammatory reactions should be maintained. At the same time, the patient's clinical symptoms should be used as the main surgical evaluation criterion to avoid unnecessary social, economic, and medical burdens caused by overtreatment.

腰椎间盘突出症是指腰椎间盘退变、生物力学环境恶化、免疫炎症反应形成,导致腰椎间盘内组织突出、神经受压等因素引起的以腰腿疼痛为主要特征的一种综合征。在大量移位性腰椎间盘突出的病例中,髓核脱出并移位,常伴有严重的临床症状,通常需要手术治疗。自腰椎间盘突出症后的吸收现象被发现并提出以来,相关文献不断涌现。有学者指出,大量迁移性突起的吸收率较高,但其机制尚未完全阐明。本文综述了近年来大量移位性腰椎间盘突出症的吸收机制。目前的研究内容主要包括免疫炎症反应、血管和淋巴管的形成、基质金属蛋白酶、脱水、细胞自噬和凋亡、张力应用等。基于上述吸收机制理论,我们认为在治疗大量迁移的LDH时,应维持炎症反应。同时,应将患者的临床症状作为主要的手术评价标准,避免因过度治疗造成不必要的社会、经济和医疗负担。
{"title":"[Research progress on the mechanism of reabsorption after massive migrated lumbar disc herniation].","authors":"Zhen-Yu Tang, Zi-Hang Li, Ya-Hao Li, Yu-Cheng Wang, Guang-Ye Zhu, Chao Li, Hong Jiang, Peng-Fei Yu","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240694","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240694","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbar disc herniation refers to a syndrome mainly characterized by low back and leg pain caused by factors such as degeneration of the lumbar intervertebral disc, deterioration of the biomechanical environment, and formation of immune inflammatory reactions, which lead to the protrusion of intradiscal tissue and compression of nerves. In cases of massive migrated lumbar disc herniation, the nucleus pulposus is prolapsed and migrated, often accompanied by severe clinical symptoms and usually requiring surgical treatment. Since the phenomenon of resorption after lumbar disc herniation is discovered and proposed, relevant literature has continuously emerged. Some scholars have indicated that the resorption rate of massive migrated protrusions is higher, but its mechanism has not been fully clarified. This article reviews and summarizes the resorption mechanisms of massive migrated lumbar disc herniation in recent years. The current research contents mainly include immune inflammatory reactions, the formation of blood vessels and lymphatics, matrix metalloproteinases, dehydration, cell autophagy and apoptosis, and tension application. Based on the above mechanism theory of resorption, we believe that in the treatment of massive migrated LDH, inflammatory reactions should be maintained. At the same time, the patient's clinical symptoms should be used as the main surgical evaluation criterion to avoid unnecessary social, economic, and medical burdens caused by overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1177-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[A finite element method biomechanical study of a new type of composite anterior cervical internal fixation methods]. 一种新型复合颈椎前路内固定方法的有限元法生物力学研究
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20241097
Zhi-Peng Hou, Sen-Qi Ye, Ji-Hui Zhang, Liu-Jun Zhao, Yong-Jie Gu, Liang Yu

Objective: To compare the biomechanical properties of four internal fixation methods in a lower cervical spine injury model using the finite element method.

Methods: Cervical CT data of a 28-year-old healthy adult male were utilized to establish a finite element model of the normal cervical spine and a lower cervical spine three-column injury model. Four internal fixation methods were then applied to the three-column injury model, resulting in four groups:Group A, anterior cervical locked-plate(ACLP) fixation system model(anterior approach);Group B, posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation model (posterior approach);Group C, combined anterior and posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation model; Group D, Novel composite anterior cervical internal fixation model. A 75 N axial compressive load and a 1.0 N·m pure moment were applied to the upper surface of the cervical spine model to simulate flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bending movements. The intervertebral range of motion(ROM) and stress distribution of the internal fixators under different motion conditions were compared across all models.

Results: Compared with the normal model, the reductions in overall intervertebral ROM for each group under flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bending were as follows:Group A, 24.04°, 23.12°, 6.24°, and 9.06°;Group B, 24.42°, 24.34°, 6.48°, and 9.20°;Group C, 25.43°, 25.29°, 7.17°, and 9.57°;Group D, 24.75°, 25.5°, 6.71°, and 9.12°. The peak stress values of the internal fixators in each group were:Group A, 53.9 MPa, 79.9 MPa, 61.4 MPa, and 80.3 MPa;Group B, 218.3 MPa, 105.4 MPa, 206.6 MPa, and 186.8 MPa;Group C, 40.8 MPa, 97.2 MPa, 47.1 MPa, and 39.4 MPa;Group D, 93.0 MPa, 144.0 MPa, 64.8 MPa, and 106.3 MPa.

Conclusion: The biomechanical properties of the novel composite anterior cervical internal fixation method are similar to those of the combined anterior-posterior fixation method, and superior to both the anterior cervical ACLP plate-screw fixation and posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation methods.

目的:采用有限元法比较4种内固定方法对下颈椎损伤模型的生物力学性能。方法:利用28岁健康成年男性颈椎CT资料,建立正常颈椎有限元模型和下颈椎三柱损伤模型。将四种内固定方法应用于三柱损伤模型,分为四组:A组,颈椎前路锁定钢板(ACLP)固定系统模型(前路);B组,后路颈椎椎弓根螺钉固定模型;C组,颈椎前后椎弓根螺钉联合固定模型;D组:新型颈椎前路复合内固定模型。在颈椎模型上表面施加75 N轴向压缩载荷和1.0 N·m纯力矩,模拟颈椎屈曲、伸展、旋转和侧弯运动。比较所有模型在不同运动条件下的椎间活动范围(ROM)和内固定物的应力分布。结果:与正常模型比较,各组在屈伸、旋转、侧屈下椎间ROM整体减小幅度分别为:A组为24.04°、23.12°、6.24°、9.06°;B组,24.42°,24.34°,6.48°,9.20°;C组,25.43°,25.29°,7.17°,9.57°;D组为24.75°,25.5°,6.71°,9.12°。各组内固定架峰值应力值分别为:A组53.9 MPa、79.9 MPa、61.4 MPa、80.3 MPa;B组分别为218.3 MPa、105.4 MPa、206.6 MPa、186.8 MPa;C组为40.8 MPa、97.2 MPa、47.1 MPa、39.4 MPa;D组为93.0 MPa、144.0 MPa、64.8 MPa、106.3 MPa。结论:新型复合颈椎前路内固定方法的生物力学性能与前路-后路联合固定方法相似,优于前路ACLP钢板-螺钉固定和颈椎后路椎弓根螺钉固定。
{"title":"[A finite element method biomechanical study of a new type of composite anterior cervical internal fixation methods].","authors":"Zhi-Peng Hou, Sen-Qi Ye, Ji-Hui Zhang, Liu-Jun Zhao, Yong-Jie Gu, Liang Yu","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20241097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20241097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the biomechanical properties of four internal fixation methods in a lower cervical spine injury model using the finite element method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cervical CT data of a 28-year-old healthy adult male were utilized to establish a finite element model of the normal cervical spine and a lower cervical spine three-column injury model. Four internal fixation methods were then applied to the three-column injury model, resulting in four groups:Group A, anterior cervical locked-plate(ACLP) fixation system model(anterior approach);Group B, posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation model (posterior approach);Group C, combined anterior and posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation model; Group D, Novel composite anterior cervical internal fixation model. A 75 N axial compressive load and a 1.0 N·m pure moment were applied to the upper surface of the cervical spine model to simulate flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bending movements. The intervertebral range of motion(ROM) and stress distribution of the internal fixators under different motion conditions were compared across all models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the normal model, the reductions in overall intervertebral ROM for each group under flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bending were as follows:Group A, 24.04°, 23.12°, 6.24°, and 9.06°;Group B, 24.42°, 24.34°, 6.48°, and 9.20°;Group C, 25.43°, 25.29°, 7.17°, and 9.57°;Group D, 24.75°, 25.5°, 6.71°, and 9.12°. The peak stress values of the internal fixators in each group were:Group A, 53.9 MPa, 79.9 MPa, 61.4 MPa, and 80.3 MPa;Group B, 218.3 MPa, 105.4 MPa, 206.6 MPa, and 186.8 MPa;Group C, 40.8 MPa, 97.2 MPa, 47.1 MPa, and 39.4 MPa;Group D, 93.0 MPa, 144.0 MPa, 64.8 MPa, and 106.3 MPa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The biomechanical properties of the novel composite anterior cervical internal fixation method are similar to those of the combined anterior-posterior fixation method, and superior to both the anterior cervical ACLP plate-screw fixation and posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1156-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Clinical application of angle-settable linear laser auxiliary instrument in vertebral puncture]. 角度可调线性激光辅助仪在椎体穿刺中的临床应用
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240862
Li-Qi Ruan, Ling Wang, Jin-Tao Hu, Pi-Sheng Qu

Objective: To compare the effects of bilateral vertebral puncture guided by an angle-adjustable linear laser auxiliary device versus free-hand bilateral vertebral puncture.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 47 patients who underwent thoracolumbar percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) from July 2022 to July 2023. All patients received bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty, among whom 27 cases underwent conventional free-hand puncture (conventional puncture group) and 20 cases underwent puncture guided by a laser auxiliary device (auxiliary puncture group). In the conventional puncture group, there were 11 males and 16 females, with an average age of (69.6±5.1) years and a disease duration of (6.5±3.8) days;the fractured vertebrae were T11-T12 in 13 cases and L1-L2 in 14 cases. In the auxiliary puncture group, there were 7 males and 13 females, with an average age of (70.8±5.6) years and a disease duration of (6.4±3.8) days;the fractured vertebrae were T11-T12 in 7 cases and L1-L2 in 13 cases. The operation time, total blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, fluoroscopy duration, radiation dose, puncture success rate, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate low back pain before surgery, 2 days after surgery, and 1 year after surgery.

Results: All patients achieved successful puncture, with good postoperative wound healing and no complications. The operation time of the auxiliary puncture group was (12.1±2.6) minutes, which was shorter than that of the conventional puncture group (14.1±2.8) minutes. The total blood loss of the auxiliary puncture group was (228.5±35.8) ml, less than that of the conventional puncture group (257.0±48.3) ml. The fluoroscopy times, fluoroscopy duration, and radiation dose of the auxiliary puncture group were (5.4±1.3) times, (15.9±3.3) seconds, and (159.4±37.4) μSv, respectively, all lower than those of the conventional puncture group (6.4±1.6) times, (18.8±4.6) seconds, (192.2±48.5) μSv, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in low back VAS scores between the two groups before surgery, 2 days after surgery, or 1 year after surgery(P>0.05).

Conclusion: Both laser auxiliary device-guided vertebral puncture and free-hand vertebral puncture have high success rates and similar postoperative curative effects. However, the laser auxiliary device-guided puncture has shorter operation time, less blood loss, and lower radiation hazard.

目的:比较角度可调线性激光辅助装置与徒手双侧椎体穿刺的效果。方法:回顾性分析2022年7月至2023年7月行胸腰椎经皮后凸成形术(PKP)的47例患者的临床资料。所有患者均行双侧经皮后凸成形术,其中常规徒手穿刺27例(常规穿刺组),激光辅助装置引导下穿刺20例(辅助穿刺组)。常规穿刺组男性11例,女性16例,平均年龄(69.6±5.1)岁,病程(6.5±3.8)天;13例为T11-T12椎体,14例为L1-L2椎体。辅助穿刺组男性7例,女性13例,平均年龄(70.8±5.6)岁,病程(6.4±3.8)天;7例为T11-T12椎体骨折,13例为L1-L2椎体骨折。比较两组手术时间、总出血量、术中透视次数、透视时间、放射剂量、穿刺成功率、手术并发症。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价术前、术后2天、术后1年腰背部疼痛。结果:所有患者穿刺成功,术后创面愈合良好,无并发症发生。辅助穿刺组手术时间为(12.1±2.6)min,比常规穿刺组(14.1±2.8)min短。辅助穿刺组总出血量为(228.5±35.8)ml,小于常规穿刺组(257.0±48.3)ml。辅助穿刺组透视次数、透视时间、放射剂量分别为(5.4±1.3)次、(15.9±3.3)秒、(159.4±37.4)μSv,均低于常规穿刺组(6.4±1.6)次、(18.8±4.6)秒、(192.2±48.5)μSv,差异有统计学意义(PP>0.05)。结论:激光辅助装置引导椎体穿刺与徒手椎体穿刺成功率高,术后疗效相近。而激光辅助装置引导穿刺具有操作时间短、出血量少、辐射危害小等优点。
{"title":"[Clinical application of angle-settable linear laser auxiliary instrument in vertebral puncture].","authors":"Li-Qi Ruan, Ling Wang, Jin-Tao Hu, Pi-Sheng Qu","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240862","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of bilateral vertebral puncture guided by an angle-adjustable linear laser auxiliary device versus free-hand bilateral vertebral puncture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 47 patients who underwent thoracolumbar percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) from July 2022 to July 2023. All patients received bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty, among whom 27 cases underwent conventional free-hand puncture (conventional puncture group) and 20 cases underwent puncture guided by a laser auxiliary device (auxiliary puncture group). In the conventional puncture group, there were 11 males and 16 females, with an average age of (69.6±5.1) years and a disease duration of (6.5±3.8) days;the fractured vertebrae were T<sub>11</sub>-T<sub>12</sub> in 13 cases and L<sub>1</sub>-L<sub>2</sub> in 14 cases. In the auxiliary puncture group, there were 7 males and 13 females, with an average age of (70.8±5.6) years and a disease duration of (6.4±3.8) days;the fractured vertebrae were T<sub>11</sub>-T<sub>12</sub> in 7 cases and L<sub>1</sub>-L<sub>2</sub> in 13 cases. The operation time, total blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, fluoroscopy duration, radiation dose, puncture success rate, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate low back pain before surgery, 2 days after surgery, and 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients achieved successful puncture, with good postoperative wound healing and no complications. The operation time of the auxiliary puncture group was (12.1±2.6) minutes, which was shorter than that of the conventional puncture group (14.1±2.8) minutes. The total blood loss of the auxiliary puncture group was (228.5±35.8) ml, less than that of the conventional puncture group (257.0±48.3) ml. The fluoroscopy times, fluoroscopy duration, and radiation dose of the auxiliary puncture group were (5.4±1.3) times, (15.9±3.3) seconds, and (159.4±37.4) μSv, respectively, all lower than those of the conventional puncture group (6.4±1.6) times, (18.8±4.6) seconds, (192.2±48.5) μSv, with statistically significant differences(<i>P</i><0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in low back VAS scores between the two groups before surgery, 2 days after surgery, or 1 year after surgery(<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both laser auxiliary device-guided vertebral puncture and free-hand vertebral puncture have high success rates and similar postoperative curative effects. However, the laser auxiliary device-guided puncture has shorter operation time, less blood loss, and lower radiation hazard.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1139-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Comparison of two transforaminal endoscopic techniques for recurrent L5S1 lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest]. [两种经椎间孔内窥镜技术治疗复发性L5S1高髂嵴腰椎间盘突出症的比较]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240747
Yue-Hong Guan, Jian Wu, Li-Jun Wang, Bin Xu, Jian Tang, Ying Zhang, Ying-Qi He
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the clinical efficacy of conventional transforaminal endoscopic technique and I See transforaminal endoscopic technique in the treatment of recurrent L<sub>5</sub>S<sub>1</sub> lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 36 patients with recurrent L5S1 lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest after posterior small-incision discectomy, admitted from May 2016 to May 2023, were selected. They were divided into the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group and the I See transforaminal endoscopy group according to the different transforaminal endoscopic techniques adopted, and all patients in both groups underwent lateral transforaminal spinal canal decompression and discectomy. There were 18 patients in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group, including 11 males and 7 females, with an age of (52.24±6.68) years;the I See transforaminal endoscopy group also had 18 patients, including 12 males and 6 females, with an age of (50.75±7.79) years. The perioperative indicators (operation time, number of intraoperative radiographs, and length of hospital stay) were compared between two groups. The clinical efficacy was evaluated using the visual analogue scale(VAS) for pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) low back pain score, and the modified MacNab criteria before and after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients achieved gradeⅠincision healing, with no infection cases. The operation time of the I See group was (64.25±16.67) minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group (89.11±17.24) minutes, and the difference was statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.05). The number of intraoperative radiographs in the I See group was (5.20±2.29) times, which was significantly less than that in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group(19.16±3.68) times, and the difference was statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.05). The VAS and total JOA scores of both groups at the 3rd day, the 3rd month after surgery, and the last follow-up were significantly lower than those before surgery, with statistically significant differences(<i>P</i><0.05);however, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS and total JOA scores between two groups at the 3rd day, the 3rd month after surgery, and the last follow-up (<i>P</i>>0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria for efficacy evaluation:in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group, 14 cases were excellent and 4 cases were good;in the I See transforaminal endoscopy group, 15 cases were excellent and 3 cases were good;there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between two groups(<i>Z</i>=0.177, <i>P</i>=0.674).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both transforaminal endoscopic techniques have good clinical effects in the treatment of recurrent L<sub>5</sub>S<sub>1</sub> lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest,
目的:探讨常规经椎间孔内窥镜技术与I - See经椎间孔内窥镜技术治疗复发性高髂嵴L5S1腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:选取2016年5月至2023年5月收治的36例后路小切口椎间盘切除术后复发性L5S1高髂嵴腰椎间盘突出症患者。根据采用的内镜技术不同分为常规经椎间孔内窥镜组和I See经椎间孔内窥镜组,两组患者均行经椎间孔外侧椎管减压和椎间盘切除术。常规经椎间孔内窥镜组18例,其中男性11例,女性7例,年龄(52.24±6.68)岁;I See经椎间孔内窥镜组18例,男12例,女6例,年龄(50.75±7.79)岁。比较两组围手术期指标(手术时间、术中x线片次数、住院时间)。采用视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、日本骨科协会(JOA)腰痛评分、术前术后改良MacNab标准评估临床疗效。结果:所有患者均达到Ⅰ级切口愈合,无感染病例。I See组手术时间为(64.25±16.67)min,明显短于常规经椎间孔内窥镜组(89.11±17.24)min,差异有统计学意义(PPPP>0.05)。根据改良MacNab疗效评价标准:常规经椎间孔内窥镜组优14例,良4例;I See经椎间孔内窥镜组,优15例,良3例;两组疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=0.177, P=0.674)。结论:两种经椎间孔内镜技术治疗复发性高髂嵴L5S1腰椎间盘突出症临床效果良好,术后症状明显改善,是安全、可靠、微创的手术方法。与传统的经椎间孔内窥镜相比,I See经椎间孔内窥镜技术操作时间更短,术中x线片较少,因此通常是首选。
{"title":"[Comparison of two transforaminal endoscopic techniques for recurrent L5S1 lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest].","authors":"Yue-Hong Guan, Jian Wu, Li-Jun Wang, Bin Xu, Jian Tang, Ying Zhang, Ying-Qi He","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240747","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To explore the clinical efficacy of conventional transforaminal endoscopic technique and I See transforaminal endoscopic technique in the treatment of recurrent L&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;S&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 36 patients with recurrent L5S1 lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest after posterior small-incision discectomy, admitted from May 2016 to May 2023, were selected. They were divided into the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group and the I See transforaminal endoscopy group according to the different transforaminal endoscopic techniques adopted, and all patients in both groups underwent lateral transforaminal spinal canal decompression and discectomy. There were 18 patients in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group, including 11 males and 7 females, with an age of (52.24±6.68) years;the I See transforaminal endoscopy group also had 18 patients, including 12 males and 6 females, with an age of (50.75±7.79) years. The perioperative indicators (operation time, number of intraoperative radiographs, and length of hospital stay) were compared between two groups. The clinical efficacy was evaluated using the visual analogue scale(VAS) for pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) low back pain score, and the modified MacNab criteria before and after surgery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;All patients achieved gradeⅠincision healing, with no infection cases. The operation time of the I See group was (64.25±16.67) minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group (89.11±17.24) minutes, and the difference was statistically significant(&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.05). The number of intraoperative radiographs in the I See group was (5.20±2.29) times, which was significantly less than that in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group(19.16±3.68) times, and the difference was statistically significant(&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.05). The VAS and total JOA scores of both groups at the 3rd day, the 3rd month after surgery, and the last follow-up were significantly lower than those before surgery, with statistically significant differences(&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.05);however, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS and total JOA scores between two groups at the 3rd day, the 3rd month after surgery, and the last follow-up (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&gt;0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria for efficacy evaluation:in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group, 14 cases were excellent and 4 cases were good;in the I See transforaminal endoscopy group, 15 cases were excellent and 3 cases were good;there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between two groups(&lt;i&gt;Z&lt;/i&gt;=0.177, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.674).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Both transforaminal endoscopic techniques have good clinical effects in the treatment of recurrent L&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;S&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest, ","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1100-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Application of 3D-printed auxiliary guides in adolescent scoliosis surgery]. 【3d打印辅助导具在青少年脊柱侧凸手术中的应用】。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240850
Dong Hou, Jian-Tao Wen, Chen Zhang, Jin Huang, Chang-Quan Dai, Kai Li, Han Leng, Jing Zhang, Shao-Bo Yang, Xiao-Juan Cui, Juan Wang, Xiao-Yun Yuan

Objective: To investigate the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement using 3D-printed auxiliary guides in scoliosis correction surgery for adolescents.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 51 patients who underwent posterior scoliosis correction surgery from January 2020 to March 2023. Among them, there were 35 cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and 16 cases of congenital scoliosis. The patients were divided into two groups based on the auxiliary tool used:the 3D-printed auxiliary guide screw placement group (3D printing group) and the free-hand screw placement group (free-hand group, without auxiliary tools). The 3D printing group included 32 patients (12 males and 20 females) with an average age of (12.59±2.60) years;the free-hand group included 19 patients (7 males and 12 females) with an average age of (14.58±3.53) years. The two groups were compared in terms of screw placement accuracy and safety, spinal correction rate, intraoperative blood loss, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, operation time, hospital stay, and preoperative and last follow-up scores of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.

Results: A total of 707 pedicle screws were placed in the two groups, with 441 screws in the 3D printing group and 266 screws in the free-hand group. All patients in both groups successfully completed the surgery. There was a statistically significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P<0.05). The screw placement accuracy rate of the 3D printing group was 95.46% (421/441), among which the Grade A placement rate was 89.34% (394/441);the screw placement accuracy rate of the free-hand group was 86.47% (230/266), with a Grade A placement rate of 73.31% (195/266). There were statistically significant differences in the accuracy of Grade A, B, and C screw placements between the two groups (P<0.05), while no statistically significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, correction rate, or hospital stay (P>0.05). In the SRS-22 questionnaire scores, the scores of functional status and activity ability, self-image, mental status, and pain of patients in each group at the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (P<0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences in all scores between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: In scoliosis correction surgery, compared with traditional free-hand screw placement, the use of 3D-printed auxiliary guides for screw placement significantly improves the accuracy and safety of screw placement and shortens the operation time.

目的:探讨3d打印辅助导具在青少年脊柱侧凸矫正手术中置入椎弓根螺钉的准确性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年3月行后路脊柱侧凸矫正手术的51例患者的临床资料。其中青少年特发性脊柱侧凸35例,先天性脊柱侧凸16例。根据使用的辅助工具将患者分为两组:3D打印辅助导钉放置组(3D打印组)和徒手放置组(徒手组,无辅助工具)。3D打印组32例,男12例,女20例,平均年龄(12.59±2.60)岁;徒手组19例,男7例,女12例,平均年龄(14.58±3.53)岁。比较两组置入螺钉的准确性和安全性、脊柱矫正率、术中出血量、术中透视次数、手术时间、住院时间、脊柱侧凸研究学会-22 (SRS-22)问卷术前和末次随访评分。结果:两组共置入椎弓根螺钉707枚,其中3D打印组置入441枚,徒手组置入266枚。两组患者均成功完成手术。两组手术时间比较,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在SRS-22问卷评分中,末次随访时各组患者的功能状态与活动能力、自我形象、精神状态、疼痛等得分均较术前有显著改善(p < 0.05)。结论:在脊柱侧弯矫正手术中,与传统徒手置入螺钉相比,使用3d打印辅助导钉置入螺钉的准确性和安全性显著提高,缩短了手术时间。
{"title":"[Application of 3D-printed auxiliary guides in adolescent scoliosis surgery].","authors":"Dong Hou, Jian-Tao Wen, Chen Zhang, Jin Huang, Chang-Quan Dai, Kai Li, Han Leng, Jing Zhang, Shao-Bo Yang, Xiao-Juan Cui, Juan Wang, Xiao-Yun Yuan","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240850","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240850","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement using 3D-printed auxiliary guides in scoliosis correction surgery for adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 51 patients who underwent posterior scoliosis correction surgery from January 2020 to March 2023. Among them, there were 35 cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and 16 cases of congenital scoliosis. The patients were divided into two groups based on the auxiliary tool used:the 3D-printed auxiliary guide screw placement group (3D printing group) and the free-hand screw placement group (free-hand group, without auxiliary tools). The 3D printing group included 32 patients (12 males and 20 females) with an average age of (12.59±2.60) years;the free-hand group included 19 patients (7 males and 12 females) with an average age of (14.58±3.53) years. The two groups were compared in terms of screw placement accuracy and safety, spinal correction rate, intraoperative blood loss, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, operation time, hospital stay, and preoperative and last follow-up scores of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 707 pedicle screws were placed in the two groups, with 441 screws in the 3D printing group and 266 screws in the free-hand group. All patients in both groups successfully completed the surgery. There was a statistically significant difference in operation time between the two groups (<i>P</i><0.05). The screw placement accuracy rate of the 3D printing group was 95.46% (421/441), among which the Grade A placement rate was 89.34% (394/441);the screw placement accuracy rate of the free-hand group was 86.47% (230/266), with a Grade A placement rate of 73.31% (195/266). There were statistically significant differences in the accuracy of Grade A, B, and C screw placements between the two groups (<i>P</i><0.05), while no statistically significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, correction rate, or hospital stay (<i>P</i>>0.05). In the SRS-22 questionnaire scores, the scores of functional status and activity ability, self-image, mental status, and pain of patients in each group at the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (<i>P</i><0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences in all scores between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In scoliosis correction surgery, compared with traditional free-hand screw placement, the use of 3D-printed auxiliary guides for screw placement significantly improves the accuracy and safety of screw placement and shortens the operation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1119-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Posterior medial branch block for persistent pain after percutaneous vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic vertebral fractures]. [后内侧支阻滞治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折经皮椎体增强术后持续疼痛]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250335
Zhe-Ren Wang, Ren Yu, Chun-de Lu, Zhi-Yuan Xu, Bin Wu, Cheng Ni

Objective: To evaluate the short-and medium-term efficacy of posterior medial branch block in the treatment of persistent pain after percutaneous vertebral augmentation.

Methods: From January 2018 to January 2023, a total of 1, 062 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures underwent percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Among them, 32 elderly patients who experienced persistent low back pain after surgery and subsequently received posterior medial branch block and cryoablation were included. Six patients died during follow-up, leaving 26 patients for final analysis (1 male, 25 females). The mean age was (82.96±5.66) years (ranged, 76 to 94 years). The mean body mass index was (23.76±3.08) kg·m-2(ranged 18.1 to 27.2 kg·m-2). The bone mineral density T-value ranged from -2.5 to -4.3 with a mean of (-3.09±0.56). The mean volume of bone cement injected was 6.00 (5.38, 7.00) ml. Fracture locations were T11 (2 cases), T12 (7 cases), L1 (10 cases), L2 (6 cases), and L3 (1 case). The mean interval from vertebral augmentation to block treatment was (7.12±2.22) months (rangd 6 to 12 months). The vertebral augmentation procedures were percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) in 12 cases and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in 14 cases. At the 2nd week, 3rd month, and 6th month after the block, the numerical rating scale(NRS), Oswestry disability index(ODI), patient satisfaction, and pain relief rate at the 6th month were evaluated. Relationships between pain relief rate at the 6th month after the last treatment and possible influencing factors were analyzed.

Results: Compared with X-ray films after percutaneous vertebral augmentation, the X-ray films before block showed an increase in kyphotic angle and vertebral compression rate, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). At the 2nd week, 3rd month, and 6th month after posterior medial branch block and cryoablation, NRS and ODI scores were significantly lower than before the block(P<0.05). Among the 26 patients, 5 received additional cryoablation. At the 6th month after the last treatment, 19 patients reported excellent or good satisfaction. Univariate binary Logistic analysis showed all P>0.05, and no independent factor affecting final satisfaction or pain relief at 6 months after the last treatment was identified.

Conclusion: Posterior medial branch block(with cryoablation) can effectively improve short-and medium-term symptoms and function in patients with persistent axial low back pain after percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

目的:评价后内侧支阻滞治疗经皮椎体隆胸术后持续性疼痛的中短期疗效。方法:2018年1月至2023年1月,对1062例骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者行经皮椎体隆胸术。其中包括32例术后持续腰痛并接受后内侧支阻滞和冷冻消融的老年患者。随访期间死亡6例,最终分析26例(男1例,女25例)。平均年龄(82.96±5.66)岁,年龄范围76 ~ 94岁。平均体重指数为(23.76±3.08)kg·m-2(18.1 ~ 27.2 kg·m-2)。骨密度t值范围为-2.5 ~ -4.3,平均值为(-3.09±0.56)。骨水泥注射体积平均为6.00(5.38、7.00)ml,骨折部位分别为T11(2例)、T12(7例)、L1(10例)、L2(6例)、L3(1例)。从椎体增强到阻滞治疗的平均间隔时间为(7.12±2.22)个月(范围6至12个月)。经皮椎体成形术(PKP) 12例,经皮椎体成形术(PVP) 14例。分别于阻滞后第2周、第3个月和第6个月,评估数值评定量表(NRS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、患者满意度和第6个月疼痛缓解率。分析末次治疗后6个月疼痛缓解率与可能的影响因素的关系。结果:与经皮椎体增强术后x线片比较,阻滞前x线片显示后凸角度和椎体压缩率增加,差异有统计学意义(PPP>0.05),未发现影响末次治疗后6个月最终满意度和疼痛缓解的独立因素。结论:经皮椎体增强术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折后持续性轴性腰痛患者后内侧支阻滞(联合冷冻消融)可有效改善中短期症状和功能。
{"title":"[Posterior medial branch block for persistent pain after percutaneous vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic vertebral fractures].","authors":"Zhe-Ren Wang, Ren Yu, Chun-de Lu, Zhi-Yuan Xu, Bin Wu, Cheng Ni","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the short-and medium-term efficacy of posterior medial branch block in the treatment of persistent pain after percutaneous vertebral augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 to January 2023, a total of 1, 062 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures underwent percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Among them, 32 elderly patients who experienced persistent low back pain after surgery and subsequently received posterior medial branch block and cryoablation were included. Six patients died during follow-up, leaving 26 patients for final analysis (1 male, 25 females). The mean age was (82.96±5.66) years (ranged, 76 to 94 years). The mean body mass index was (23.76±3.08) kg·m<sup>-2</sup>(ranged 18.1 to 27.2 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>). The bone mineral density T-value ranged from -2.5 to -4.3 with a mean of (-3.09±0.56). The mean volume of bone cement injected was 6.00 (5.38, 7.00) ml. Fracture locations were T<sub>11</sub> (2 cases), T<sub>12</sub> (7 cases), L<sub>1</sub> (10 cases), L<sub>2</sub> (6 cases), and L<sub>3</sub> (1 case). The mean interval from vertebral augmentation to block treatment was (7.12±2.22) months (rangd 6 to 12 months). The vertebral augmentation procedures were percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) in 12 cases and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in 14 cases. At the 2nd week, 3rd month, and 6th month after the block, the numerical rating scale(NRS), Oswestry disability index(ODI), patient satisfaction, and pain relief rate at the 6th month were evaluated. Relationships between pain relief rate at the 6th month after the last treatment and possible influencing factors were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with X-ray films after percutaneous vertebral augmentation, the X-ray films before block showed an increase in kyphotic angle and vertebral compression rate, with statistically significant differences(<i>P</i><0.05). At the 2nd week, 3rd month, and 6th month after posterior medial branch block and cryoablation, NRS and ODI scores were significantly lower than before the block(<i>P</i><0.05). Among the 26 patients, 5 received additional cryoablation. At the 6th month after the last treatment, 19 patients reported excellent or good satisfaction. Univariate binary Logistic analysis showed all <i>P</i>>0.05, and no independent factor affecting final satisfaction or pain relief at 6 months after the last treatment was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior medial branch block(with cryoablation) can effectively improve short-and medium-term symptoms and function in patients with persistent axial low back pain after percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1145-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Ipsilateral femoral neck fracture after InterTan internal fixation for intertrochanteric femoral fracture:a case report]. 【InterTan内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折致同侧股骨颈骨折1例】。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250049
Rong-Xuan Liu, Qiang Li, Rong Chen, Yong-Ping Wang
{"title":"[Ipsilateral femoral neck fracture after InterTan internal fixation for intertrochanteric femoral fracture:a case report].","authors":"Rong-Xuan Liu, Qiang Li, Rong Chen, Yong-Ping Wang","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250049","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1174-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[One-hole split endoscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases:an early efficacy observation]. [单孔分裂内窥镜辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的早期疗效观察]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250208
You Lyu, Gui-Guang Liu, Fu-Li Li
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the early clinical efficacy, safety, and application value of one-hole split endoscopy (OSE)-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent OSE-assisted TLIF between June 2023 and June 2024. There were 10 males and 7 females, with a mean of (55.30±6.52) years old ranging 43 to 65 years. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 36 months with a mean of(12.4±13.3) months. The disease distribution was as follows:lumbar disc herniation (7 cases), lumbar spinal stenosis (5 cases), and lumbar spondylolisthesis (2 cases). Operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, number of intraoperative fluoroscopic exposures, time to ambulation, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The dural sac area at the affected segment, visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back pain and leg pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. The modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the surgical outcome at the final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 17 patients successfully underwent surgery and were followed up for 3 to 15 months with a mean of (8.4±3.3) months. The operative time was 120 to 200 minutes with a mean of (143.2±22.0) minutes, the incision length on the decompression side was 1.80 to 4.00 cm with a mean of (2.56±0.65) cm, intraoperative blood loss was 50 to 300 ml with a mean of (161.2±72.5) ml, the number of fluoroscopic exposures was 15 to 38 with a mean of (23.4±6.5), time to ambulation was 24 to 72 hours with a mean of (49.2±11.9) hours, and postoperative hospital stay was 3 to 9 days with a mean of (4.9±1.5) days. Two patients developed transient lower limb pain and numbness, which completely resolved with conservative treatment. The postoperative dural sac area was (121.47±14.90) mm<sup>2</sup>, which was significantly larger than the preoperative area (51.47±7.69) mm<sup>2</sup>(<i>P</i><0.001). The VAS for low back pain were (6.23±1.64), (2.94±1.43), and (1.94±0.75) at preoperation, 3 days postoperation, and final follow-up, respectively;the VAS for leg pain were (7.06±1.43), (2.35±1.17), and (2.06±0.90) at the same time points. The VAS at all postoperative time points were significantly lower than preoperative scores (<i>P</i><0.001). The ODI at final follow-up was (25.29±8.15)%, which was significantly better than the preoperative ODI of(82.35±5.16)%(<i>P</i><0.001). At the final follow-up, the MacNab surgical outcome was excellent in 11 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OSE-assisted TLIF is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive technique with a gentle learning curve for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, capable of effectively relieving symptoms and improving fu
目的:探讨一孔分裂内镜(OSE)辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的早期临床疗效、安全性及应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2023年6月至2024年6月期间17例腰椎退行性疾病患者行ose辅助TLIF。男性10例,女性7例,平均(55.30±6.52)岁,年龄43 ~ 65岁。病程3 ~ 36个月,平均(12.4±13.3)个月。疾病分布如下:腰椎间盘突出7例,腰椎管狭窄5例,腰椎滑脱2例。记录手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术中透视次数、下床时间、术后住院时间和并发症。术前、术后分别记录患段硬膜囊面积、腰痛、腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry失能指数(ODI)。在最后随访时,采用改良的MacNab标准评估手术结果。结果:17例患者均顺利完成手术,随访3 ~ 15个月,平均(8.4±3.3)个月。手术时间是120到200分钟的意思(143.2±22.0)分钟,减压侧切口的长度是1.80到4.00厘米的意思(2.56±0.65)厘米,术中失血是50到300毫升(161.2±72.5)的意思是ml,荧光镜的曝光的数量是15到38平均(23.4±6.5),步行时间是24到72小时平均值为(49.2±11.9)小时,和术后住院时间与平均3至9天(4.9±1.5)天。2例患者出现一过性下肢疼痛和麻木,经保守治疗后完全缓解。术后硬膜囊面积为(121.47±14.90)mm2,明显大于术前面积(51.47±7.69)mm2(ppp)。结论:osse辅助下的TLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病是一种有效、安全、微创的技术,学习曲线平缓,能有效缓解症状,改善功能。
{"title":"[One-hole split endoscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases:an early efficacy observation].","authors":"You Lyu, Gui-Guang Liu, Fu-Li Li","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250208","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To investigate the early clinical efficacy, safety, and application value of one-hole split endoscopy (OSE)-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent OSE-assisted TLIF between June 2023 and June 2024. There were 10 males and 7 females, with a mean of (55.30±6.52) years old ranging 43 to 65 years. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 36 months with a mean of(12.4±13.3) months. The disease distribution was as follows:lumbar disc herniation (7 cases), lumbar spinal stenosis (5 cases), and lumbar spondylolisthesis (2 cases). Operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, number of intraoperative fluoroscopic exposures, time to ambulation, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The dural sac area at the affected segment, visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back pain and leg pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. The modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the surgical outcome at the final follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;All 17 patients successfully underwent surgery and were followed up for 3 to 15 months with a mean of (8.4±3.3) months. The operative time was 120 to 200 minutes with a mean of (143.2±22.0) minutes, the incision length on the decompression side was 1.80 to 4.00 cm with a mean of (2.56±0.65) cm, intraoperative blood loss was 50 to 300 ml with a mean of (161.2±72.5) ml, the number of fluoroscopic exposures was 15 to 38 with a mean of (23.4±6.5), time to ambulation was 24 to 72 hours with a mean of (49.2±11.9) hours, and postoperative hospital stay was 3 to 9 days with a mean of (4.9±1.5) days. Two patients developed transient lower limb pain and numbness, which completely resolved with conservative treatment. The postoperative dural sac area was (121.47±14.90) mm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, which was significantly larger than the preoperative area (51.47±7.69) mm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;(&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). The VAS for low back pain were (6.23±1.64), (2.94±1.43), and (1.94±0.75) at preoperation, 3 days postoperation, and final follow-up, respectively;the VAS for leg pain were (7.06±1.43), (2.35±1.17), and (2.06±0.90) at the same time points. The VAS at all postoperative time points were significantly lower than preoperative scores (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). The ODI at final follow-up was (25.29±8.15)%, which was significantly better than the preoperative ODI of(82.35±5.16)%(&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). At the final follow-up, the MacNab surgical outcome was excellent in 11 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;OSE-assisted TLIF is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive technique with a gentle learning curve for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, capable of effectively relieving symptoms and improving fu","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 11","pages":"1106-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1