[Short-term effectiveness of Gamma 3 U-Blade system for osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly].

Wenbin Fan, Liu Shi, Tian Xie, Cheng Zhang, Xiangxu Chen, Hui Chen, Yunfeng Rui
{"title":"[Short-term effectiveness of Gamma 3 U-Blade system for osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly].","authors":"Wenbin Fan, Liu Shi, Tian Xie, Cheng Zhang, Xiangxu Chen, Hui Chen, Yunfeng Rui","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202407041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the short-term effectiveness between Gamma 3 intramedullary nails and Gamma 3 U-Blade system in the treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 124 elderly patients with osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures, who were admitted between February 2020 and February 2023 and met the selection criteria. The fractures were fixed with Gamma 3 intramedullary nails in 65 patients (control group) and Gamma 3 U-Blade systems in 59 patients (UB group). The differences between the two groups were not significant in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, bone mineral density, time from injury to operation, fracture classification, and affected side ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and fracture healing time were recorded; the tip-apex distance, fracture reduction quality, and lag screw position were evaluated on X-ray films at immediate after operation; the lag screw sliding distance and change value of neck-shaft angle were measured on X-ray films at last follow-up. Harris hip score at 1 year after operation and the occurrence of internal fixation-related complications were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay in the UB group increased compared to the control group, but the differences were not significant ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All patients in both groups were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17.1 months). At 12 months after operation, there was no significant difference in the Harris hip score between the two groups ( <i>P</i><0.05). Radiological examination showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05) in terms of tip-apex distance, fracture reduction quality, and lag screw position. Fractures healed in both groups, and there was no significant difference in healing time ( <i>P</i>>0.05). At last follow-up, the change value of neck-shaft angle and lag screw sliding distance in the UB group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( <i>P</i><0.05). During follow-up, no related complications occurred in the UB group, while 6 cases (9.2%) in the control group experienced complications, and the difference in the incidence was significant ( <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly, the Gamma 3 U-Blade system fixation can achieve good short-term effectiveness, with better imaging results compared to Gamma 3 intramedullary nails fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 1","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202407041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the short-term effectiveness between Gamma 3 intramedullary nails and Gamma 3 U-Blade system in the treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 124 elderly patients with osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures, who were admitted between February 2020 and February 2023 and met the selection criteria. The fractures were fixed with Gamma 3 intramedullary nails in 65 patients (control group) and Gamma 3 U-Blade systems in 59 patients (UB group). The differences between the two groups were not significant in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, bone mineral density, time from injury to operation, fracture classification, and affected side ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and fracture healing time were recorded; the tip-apex distance, fracture reduction quality, and lag screw position were evaluated on X-ray films at immediate after operation; the lag screw sliding distance and change value of neck-shaft angle were measured on X-ray films at last follow-up. Harris hip score at 1 year after operation and the occurrence of internal fixation-related complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay in the UB group increased compared to the control group, but the differences were not significant ( P>0.05). All patients in both groups were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17.1 months). At 12 months after operation, there was no significant difference in the Harris hip score between the two groups ( P<0.05). Radiological examination showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in terms of tip-apex distance, fracture reduction quality, and lag screw position. Fractures healed in both groups, and there was no significant difference in healing time ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, the change value of neck-shaft angle and lag screw sliding distance in the UB group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P<0.05). During follow-up, no related complications occurred in the UB group, while 6 cases (9.2%) in the control group experienced complications, and the difference in the incidence was significant ( P<0.05).

Conclusion: For the osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly, the Gamma 3 U-Blade system fixation can achieve good short-term effectiveness, with better imaging results compared to Gamma 3 intramedullary nails fixation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Gamma 3 u型刀片系统治疗老年骨质疏松性转子间骨折的短期疗效]。
目的:比较Gamma - 3髓内钉与Gamma - 3 u型刀片系统治疗老年骨质疏松性粗隆间骨折的近期疗效。方法:回顾性分析2020年2月~ 2023年2月收治的符合入选标准的124例老年骨质疏松性粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料。65例患者采用Gamma 3髓内钉固定(对照组),59例患者采用Gamma 3 U-Blade系统固定(UB组)。两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉学会(ASA)分级、骨密度、伤至手术时间、骨折分型、患侧等方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。记录手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、骨折愈合时间;术后即刻x线片评价椎尖间距、骨折复位质量、螺钉位置;最后随访时,在x射线片上测量了滞后螺杆的滑动距离和颈轴角的变化值。比较两组术后1年Harris髋关节评分及内固定相关并发症发生情况。结果:UB组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间较对照组明显增加,但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者均随访12 ~ 24个月,平均17.1个月。术后12个月,两组Harris髋关节评分在尖端距离、骨折复位质量、拉力螺钉位置方面差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组骨折均愈合,愈合时间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。最后随访时,UB组颈轴角及拉力螺钉滑动距离的变化值均明显低于对照组(ppp)。结论:对于老年骨质疏松性粗隆间骨折,Gamma 3 U-Blade系统内固定短期疗效良好,影像学效果优于Gamma 3髓内钉内固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Comparative analysis of effectiveness of two single-pin internal fixation techniques in treatment of pediatric distal radial metaphyseal diaphyseal junction fractures]. [Comparative study of orthopaedic robot-assisted and arthroscopy-assisted treatment of Rockwood type and acute acromioclavicular dislocation]. [Comparison of effectiveness between endoscopic and microscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion]. [Comparison of effectiveness between visualized reamer foraminoplasty and transforaminal endoscopic spine system technique in transforminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation]. [Comparison of effectiveness between infrapatellar and semi-extended parapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing in treatment of type A tibial shaft fractures].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1