Remote assessment of physical fitness via videoconferencing: a systematic review.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s13102-024-01050-w
Thorsten Klein, Annette Worth, Claudia Niessner, Anke Hanssen-Doose
{"title":"Remote assessment of physical fitness via videoconferencing: a systematic review.","authors":"Thorsten Klein, Annette Worth, Claudia Niessner, Anke Hanssen-Doose","doi":"10.1186/s13102-024-01050-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical fitness is a critical marker of overall health across all age groups, influencing longevity and quality of life. This systematic review assessed the use of remote physical fitness assessments, a crucial adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic that broadened access to health monitoring outside traditional settings. The review included 35 studies, covering various age groups and health conditions, and evaluated 48 physical fitness tests across eight physical fitness components. Balance, muscular strength, and endurance were the most frequently assessed, with tests like the 30-second sit-to-stand (30s-STS) showing strong validity, reliability, and feasibility for remote use. However, the study population was mainly adults and older adults, with nearly no focus on children, revealing a significant gap in research for younger populations. Additionally, the review identified gaps in assessing components such as body composition, reaction time, and agility, which are crucial for a comprehensive assessment of physical fitness. These gaps underscore the need for further research and development of reliable and valid remote assessment tools. The findings of this review emphasize the importance of standardizing remote physical fitness assessments to ensure their validity, reliability, and feasibility making them effective tools for health monitoring across diverse populations and settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-01050-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical fitness is a critical marker of overall health across all age groups, influencing longevity and quality of life. This systematic review assessed the use of remote physical fitness assessments, a crucial adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic that broadened access to health monitoring outside traditional settings. The review included 35 studies, covering various age groups and health conditions, and evaluated 48 physical fitness tests across eight physical fitness components. Balance, muscular strength, and endurance were the most frequently assessed, with tests like the 30-second sit-to-stand (30s-STS) showing strong validity, reliability, and feasibility for remote use. However, the study population was mainly adults and older adults, with nearly no focus on children, revealing a significant gap in research for younger populations. Additionally, the review identified gaps in assessing components such as body composition, reaction time, and agility, which are crucial for a comprehensive assessment of physical fitness. These gaps underscore the need for further research and development of reliable and valid remote assessment tools. The findings of this review emphasize the importance of standardizing remote physical fitness assessments to ensure their validity, reliability, and feasibility making them effective tools for health monitoring across diverse populations and settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过视频会议远程评估身体健康:系统回顾。
身体健康是所有年龄组整体健康状况的关键标志,影响寿命和生活质量。本次系统回顾评估了远程体能评估的使用情况,这是2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的一项重要调整,扩大了在传统环境之外进行健康监测的机会。该综述包括35项研究,涵盖了不同的年龄组和健康状况,并评估了8项身体健康成分的48项身体健康测试。平衡、肌肉力量和耐力是最常被评估的,像30秒坐立(30s-STS)这样的测试显示出很强的有效性、可靠性和远程使用的可行性。然而,研究人群主要是成年人和老年人,几乎没有关注儿童,这表明对年轻人群的研究存在显著差距。此外,该审查还发现了在评估身体成分、反应时间和敏捷性等方面的差距,这些对全面评估身体健康至关重要。这些差距强调需要进一步研究和开发可靠和有效的远程评估工具。本综述的研究结果强调了标准化远程体能评估的重要性,以确保其有效性、可靠性和可行性,使其成为不同人群和环境中健康监测的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
期刊最新文献
The effect of preoperative rehabilitation exercises on postoperative bone mineral density, tendon-bone healing, and physical function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial. Acute effects of inspiratory muscle warm-up on muscular performance and pulmonary function in natural male bodybuilders. Does task experience moderate habituation effects in drop jumps? - An intra- and interday reliability and measurement error analysis. Muscle oxygen saturation reflects individualized responses to exercise intensity during rowing ergometer exercise. Multisensory feedback in gymnastics education: a kinematic study on skill acquisition in youth athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1