Assessing therapist skills in teletherapy: the development and validation of the tele-facilitative interpersonal skills task.

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2025.2451329
Eva Antebi-Lerman, Tao Lin, Timothy Anderson, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn
{"title":"Assessing therapist skills in teletherapy: the development and validation of the tele-facilitative interpersonal skills task.","authors":"Eva Antebi-Lerman, Tao Lin, Timothy Anderson, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2451329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Teletherapy via videoconferencing has become common practice but has unique challenges. We aimed to develop and validate the first performance-based observer-rated measure of teletherapy skills: The Teletherapy Facilitative Interpersonal Skills Performance Task (Tele-FIS). <b>Methods:</b> We developed a set of 12 Tele-FIS video stimulus clips as simulations of four research-informed common therapeutic challenges in teletherapy: technology, distraction, boundaries and privacy, and emotional disconnection. A total of 153 therapists recorded interventions to the clips which were later rated on interpersonal skills. <b>Results:</b> The Tele-FIS performance task demonstrated good interrater reliability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. The Tele-FIS was positively associated with self-reported facilitative interpersonal skills, self-efficacy, attitudes towards technology, and observer-rated skills on a version of the FIS task that simulates in-person therapy. Therapists performed similarly on teletherapy clips of emotional disconnection and privacy issues compared to clips of in-person therapy. Therapists performed worse on Tele-FIS clips of technology and distraction challenges than in-person therapy clips. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Tele-FIS has potential as an assessment tool in skills training for trainees and licensed clinicians as well as future research about therapeutic work via teletherapy. Results are discussed to consider therapist skill and the use of practice-relevant materials in training.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2451329","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Teletherapy via videoconferencing has become common practice but has unique challenges. We aimed to develop and validate the first performance-based observer-rated measure of teletherapy skills: The Teletherapy Facilitative Interpersonal Skills Performance Task (Tele-FIS). Methods: We developed a set of 12 Tele-FIS video stimulus clips as simulations of four research-informed common therapeutic challenges in teletherapy: technology, distraction, boundaries and privacy, and emotional disconnection. A total of 153 therapists recorded interventions to the clips which were later rated on interpersonal skills. Results: The Tele-FIS performance task demonstrated good interrater reliability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. The Tele-FIS was positively associated with self-reported facilitative interpersonal skills, self-efficacy, attitudes towards technology, and observer-rated skills on a version of the FIS task that simulates in-person therapy. Therapists performed similarly on teletherapy clips of emotional disconnection and privacy issues compared to clips of in-person therapy. Therapists performed worse on Tele-FIS clips of technology and distraction challenges than in-person therapy clips. Conclusions: The Tele-FIS has potential as an assessment tool in skills training for trainees and licensed clinicians as well as future research about therapeutic work via teletherapy. Results are discussed to consider therapist skill and the use of practice-relevant materials in training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
Maintaining relevance in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A novel approach to discerning between effective vs. ineffective discourse correlated with better session outcomes. "Vulnerability can breed strength": The role of borderline personality disorder severity in movement synchrony among patients with major depressive disorder. Improved dropout prediction in group cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) using classification trees. Mapping the growth of the CORE system tools in psychotherapy research from 1998 to 2021: Learning from historical evidence. Therapist Interpersonal Skills and Outcomes for Young People.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1