Can gamification improve children’s performance in mental rotation?

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106169
Samantha Zakrzewski , Edward Merrill , Yingying Yang
{"title":"Can gamification improve children’s performance in mental rotation?","authors":"Samantha Zakrzewski ,&nbsp;Edward Merrill ,&nbsp;Yingying Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A common obstacle in cognitive development research is that many cognitive tasks can be long, repetitive, and hence seemingly boring for children. The current study examined whether incorporating gamification elements could make a classic mental rotation task more child-friendly and engaging for young children. A total of 100 children aged 6 to 9 years participated in two mental rotation tasks, where one included gamification elements and the other did not. Results showed that gamification indeed improved performance on the task. Furthermore, this effect did not vary as a function of age, gender, or task difficulty. However, it interacted with testing order, such that those children who received the baseline condition first improved their performance in the gamification condition later on, whereas those children who received the gamification condition first were able to maintain a good performance in the baseline condition later on. Lastly, although some personality factors (e.g., Agreeableness, Openness to Experience) correlated with the overall performance, they did not predict the gamification effects. Therefore, our results have practical implications for using gamification in designing cognitively demanding tasks for children. Theoretically, they help to further understand how gamification affects cognition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 106169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524003096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A common obstacle in cognitive development research is that many cognitive tasks can be long, repetitive, and hence seemingly boring for children. The current study examined whether incorporating gamification elements could make a classic mental rotation task more child-friendly and engaging for young children. A total of 100 children aged 6 to 9 years participated in two mental rotation tasks, where one included gamification elements and the other did not. Results showed that gamification indeed improved performance on the task. Furthermore, this effect did not vary as a function of age, gender, or task difficulty. However, it interacted with testing order, such that those children who received the baseline condition first improved their performance in the gamification condition later on, whereas those children who received the gamification condition first were able to maintain a good performance in the baseline condition later on. Lastly, although some personality factors (e.g., Agreeableness, Openness to Experience) correlated with the overall performance, they did not predict the gamification effects. Therefore, our results have practical implications for using gamification in designing cognitively demanding tasks for children. Theoretically, they help to further understand how gamification affects cognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游戏化能提高儿童心理旋转的表现吗?
认知发展研究的一个常见障碍是,许多认知任务可能很长,重复,因此对儿童来说似乎很无聊。目前的研究考察了融入游戏化元素是否可以使经典的心理旋转任务对儿童更友好,更吸引幼儿。共有100名6至9岁的儿童参加了两项心理旋转任务,其中一项包括游戏化元素,另一项没有。结果表明,游戏化确实提高了任务的表现。此外,这种效果不随年龄、性别或任务难度的变化而变化。然而,它与测试顺序相互作用,使得那些首先接受基线条件的孩子在游戏化条件下的表现有所提高,而那些首先接受游戏化条件的孩子在基线条件下的表现保持良好。最后,尽管一些人格因素(如亲和性、开放性)与整体表现相关,但它们并不能预测游戏化效应。因此,我们的研究结果对使用游戏化设计儿童认知要求高的任务具有实际意义。从理论上讲,它们有助于进一步理解游戏化如何影响认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Confirmation bias in young children’s information seeking and evaluation of novel foods Bidirectional associations between self-regulation, social-emotional skills and mathematics in preschoolers: the interplay with teacher-child relationships The development of essentialist beliefs about social status categories in China Do picture books affect counting directionality in preliterate children? Developmental course and potential mechanisms Written or drawn episodic future thinking cues improves delay discounting in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1