Investigating Risk Factors for Racial Disparity in E-Cigarette Use with PATH Study.

IF 0.9 Q4 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Stats Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.3390/stats7030037
Amy Liu, Kennedy Dorsey, Almetra Granger, Ty-Runet Bryant, Tung-Sung Tseng, Michael Celestin, Qingzhao Yu
{"title":"Investigating Risk Factors for Racial Disparity in E-Cigarette Use with PATH Study.","authors":"Amy Liu, Kennedy Dorsey, Almetra Granger, Ty-Runet Bryant, Tung-Sung Tseng, Michael Celestin, Qingzhao Yu","doi":"10.3390/stats7030037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has identified differences in e-cigarette use and socioeconomic factors between different racial groups However, there is little research examining specific risk factors contributing to the racial differences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to identify racial disparities in e-cigarette use and to determine risk factors that help explain these differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the Adult Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. First, we conducted descriptive statistics of e-smoking across our risk factor variables. Next, we used multiple logistic regression to check the risk effects by adjusting all covariates. Finally, we conducted a mediation analysis to determine whether identified factors showed evidence of influencing the association between race and e-cigarette use. All analyses were performed in R or SAS. The R package mma was used for the mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White populations, our potential risk factors collectively explain 17.5% of the racial difference, former cigarette smoking explains 7.6%, receiving e-cigarette advertising 2.6%, and perception of e-cigarette harm explains 27.8% of the racial difference. Between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations, former cigarette smoking, receiving e-cigarette advertising, and perception of e-cigarette harm explain 5.2%, 1.8%, and 6.8% of the racial difference, respectively. E-cigarette use is most prevalent in the non-Hispanic White population compared to non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, which may be explained by former cigarette smoking, exposure to e-cigarette advertising, and e-cigarette harm perception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that racial differences in e-cigarette use may be reduced by increasing knowledge of the dangers associated with e-cigarette use and reducing exposure to e-cigarette advertisements. This comprehensive analysis of risk factors can be used to significantly guide smoking cessation efforts and address potential health burden disparities arising from differences in e-cigarette usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":93142,"journal":{"name":"Stats","volume":"7 3","pages":"613-626"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stats","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7030037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has identified differences in e-cigarette use and socioeconomic factors between different racial groups However, there is little research examining specific risk factors contributing to the racial differences.

Objective: This study sought to identify racial disparities in e-cigarette use and to determine risk factors that help explain these differences.

Methods: We used Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the Adult Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. First, we conducted descriptive statistics of e-smoking across our risk factor variables. Next, we used multiple logistic regression to check the risk effects by adjusting all covariates. Finally, we conducted a mediation analysis to determine whether identified factors showed evidence of influencing the association between race and e-cigarette use. All analyses were performed in R or SAS. The R package mma was used for the mediation analysis.

Results: Between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White populations, our potential risk factors collectively explain 17.5% of the racial difference, former cigarette smoking explains 7.6%, receiving e-cigarette advertising 2.6%, and perception of e-cigarette harm explains 27.8% of the racial difference. Between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations, former cigarette smoking, receiving e-cigarette advertising, and perception of e-cigarette harm explain 5.2%, 1.8%, and 6.8% of the racial difference, respectively. E-cigarette use is most prevalent in the non-Hispanic White population compared to non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, which may be explained by former cigarette smoking, exposure to e-cigarette advertising, and e-cigarette harm perception.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that racial differences in e-cigarette use may be reduced by increasing knowledge of the dangers associated with e-cigarette use and reducing exposure to e-cigarette advertisements. This comprehensive analysis of risk factors can be used to significantly guide smoking cessation efforts and address potential health burden disparities arising from differences in e-cigarette usage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating Risk Factors for Racial Disparity in E-Cigarette Use with PATH Study. Precise Tensor Product Smoothing via Spectral Splines Predicting Random Walks and a Data-Splitting Prediction Region The Mediating Impact of Innovation Types in the Relationship between Innovation Use Theory and Market Performance Jump-Robust Realized-GARCH-MIDAS-X Estimators for Bitcoin and Ethereum Volatility Indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1