Long-term posttransplant-related bone volumetric changes in eight face transplant recipients – A single-center retrospective case series

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.025
Lioba Huelsboemer , Sam Boroumand , Tara Boroumand , Aliyar Zahedi Vafa , Neil Parikh , Laetitia S. Chiarella , Leonard Knoedler , Viola A. Stögner , Peter Hung , Sam Sadigh , Siba Haykal , Bohdan Pomahac , Martin Kauke-Navarro
{"title":"Long-term posttransplant-related bone volumetric changes in eight face transplant recipients – A single-center retrospective case series","authors":"Lioba Huelsboemer ,&nbsp;Sam Boroumand ,&nbsp;Tara Boroumand ,&nbsp;Aliyar Zahedi Vafa ,&nbsp;Neil Parikh ,&nbsp;Laetitia S. Chiarella ,&nbsp;Leonard Knoedler ,&nbsp;Viola A. Stögner ,&nbsp;Peter Hung ,&nbsp;Sam Sadigh ,&nbsp;Siba Haykal ,&nbsp;Bohdan Pomahac ,&nbsp;Martin Kauke-Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The long-term stability of allograft or native bone in facial vascularized composite allograft (fVCA) recipients is unclear. This study quantified long-term bone volume changes in facial transplants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Computed tomography scans of eight fVCA recipients (2011–2023) were analyzed with Materialise Mimics. Native bone (soft tissue-only VCAs, n=4) and allotransplanted bone (n=4) were compared. Median bone volumes were assessed for significance using the WilcoxonRanked-Sum Test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean follow-up was 10 years (range 5–13). A significant median decrease in both mandibular (−6520 mm<sup>3</sup>; p=0.0078) and maxillary (−3548 mm<sup>3</sup>; p=0.0078) bone volumes was seen in all patients, irrespective of bone origin. Median bone volume loss was −9.92% in the bony allograft cohort and −22.60% in the soft tissue-only cohort, respectively. The histopathological analysis of the limited samples (n=2) showed physiological bone even after ten years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with allotransplanted bone showed less pronounced volume loss compared to those with native bone receiving soft tissue-only allografts. This finding suggests that allotransplanted vascularized bone in fVCAs may not be a primary target of chronic rejection processes that compromise bone volume stability and functionality. Bone volume changes are likely influenced by multiple factors, such as tooth loss, nutrition, chronic immunosuppression (e.g., steroids), mechanical stress/load, varying bone remodeling rates, and other medical comorbidities. Further research is needed to clarify the factors affecting bone volume and remodeling after fVCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"101 ","pages":"Pages 220-230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524007277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The long-term stability of allograft or native bone in facial vascularized composite allograft (fVCA) recipients is unclear. This study quantified long-term bone volume changes in facial transplants.

Methods

Computed tomography scans of eight fVCA recipients (2011–2023) were analyzed with Materialise Mimics. Native bone (soft tissue-only VCAs, n=4) and allotransplanted bone (n=4) were compared. Median bone volumes were assessed for significance using the WilcoxonRanked-Sum Test.

Results

Mean follow-up was 10 years (range 5–13). A significant median decrease in both mandibular (−6520 mm3; p=0.0078) and maxillary (−3548 mm3; p=0.0078) bone volumes was seen in all patients, irrespective of bone origin. Median bone volume loss was −9.92% in the bony allograft cohort and −22.60% in the soft tissue-only cohort, respectively. The histopathological analysis of the limited samples (n=2) showed physiological bone even after ten years.

Conclusion

Patients with allotransplanted bone showed less pronounced volume loss compared to those with native bone receiving soft tissue-only allografts. This finding suggests that allotransplanted vascularized bone in fVCAs may not be a primary target of chronic rejection processes that compromise bone volume stability and functionality. Bone volume changes are likely influenced by multiple factors, such as tooth loss, nutrition, chronic immunosuppression (e.g., steroids), mechanical stress/load, varying bone remodeling rates, and other medical comorbidities. Further research is needed to clarify the factors affecting bone volume and remodeling after fVCA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
8例面部移植受者长期移植后相关骨体积变化-单中心回顾性病例系列
背景:面部血管化复合同种异体骨移植(fVCA)受者的同种异体骨或原生骨的长期稳定性尚不清楚。这项研究量化了面部移植的长期骨体积变化。方法:采用Materialise Mimics软件对8例fVCA受术者(2011-2023)的ct扫描结果进行分析。比较原生骨(仅软组织vca, n=4)和同种异体移植骨(n=4)。使用wilcoxonrank - sum检验评估中位骨体积的显著性。结果:平均随访10年(范围5-13年)。双下颌显著中位下降(-6520 mm3;P =0.0078)和上颌(-3548 mm3;P =0.0078),所有患者均可见骨体积,与骨来源无关。同种异体骨移植组的中位骨体积损失为-9.92%,仅软组织组的中位骨体积损失为-22.60%。有限样本(n=2)的组织病理学分析显示即使在十年后仍有生理性骨。结论:同种异体骨移植患者比单纯软组织同种异体骨移植患者体积损失更小。这一发现表明,同种异体移植的血管化骨在fvca中可能不是慢性排斥反应的主要目标,慢性排斥反应会损害骨体积稳定性和功能。骨体积的变化可能受到多种因素的影响,如牙齿脱落、营养、慢性免疫抑制(如类固醇)、机械应力/负荷、不同的骨重塑率和其他医学合并症。fVCA后影响骨体积和骨重塑的因素有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Understanding public perceptions of plastic surgery: A cross-sectional analysis across sociodemographic groups GLP-1 receptor agonist use and surgical outcomes following diabetic foot reconstruction: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study Erratum to “Is there an ideal recipient site preconditioning to improve autologous fat graft retention in breast surgery? A prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial” [J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 113 (2026) 435–444] Risk factors affecting tissue expander use and nipple areolar complex sparing in Goldilocks mastectomy Bridging ambition and evidence: The Australian Breast Device Registry comes of age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1