Long-term posttransplant-related bone volumetric changes in eight face transplant recipients – A single-center retrospective case series

Lioba Huelsboemer , Sam Boroumand , Tara Boroumand , Aliyar Zahedi Vafa , Neil Parikh , Laetitia S. Chiarella , Leonard Knoedler , Viola A. Stögner , Peter Hung , Sam Sadigh , Siba Haykal , Bohdan Pomahac , Martin Kauke-Navarro
{"title":"Long-term posttransplant-related bone volumetric changes in eight face transplant recipients – A single-center retrospective case series","authors":"Lioba Huelsboemer ,&nbsp;Sam Boroumand ,&nbsp;Tara Boroumand ,&nbsp;Aliyar Zahedi Vafa ,&nbsp;Neil Parikh ,&nbsp;Laetitia S. Chiarella ,&nbsp;Leonard Knoedler ,&nbsp;Viola A. Stögner ,&nbsp;Peter Hung ,&nbsp;Sam Sadigh ,&nbsp;Siba Haykal ,&nbsp;Bohdan Pomahac ,&nbsp;Martin Kauke-Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The long-term stability of allograft or native bone in facial vascularized composite allograft (fVCA) recipients is unclear. This study quantified long-term bone volume changes in facial transplants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Computed tomography scans of eight fVCA recipients (2011–2023) were analyzed with Materialise Mimics. Native bone (soft tissue-only VCAs, n=4) and allotransplanted bone (n=4) were compared. Median bone volumes were assessed for significance using the WilcoxonRanked-Sum Test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean follow-up was 10 years (range 5–13). A significant median decrease in both mandibular (−6520 mm<sup>3</sup>; p=0.0078) and maxillary (−3548 mm<sup>3</sup>; p=0.0078) bone volumes was seen in all patients, irrespective of bone origin. Median bone volume loss was −9.92% in the bony allograft cohort and −22.60% in the soft tissue-only cohort, respectively. The histopathological analysis of the limited samples (n=2) showed physiological bone even after ten years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with allotransplanted bone showed less pronounced volume loss compared to those with native bone receiving soft tissue-only allografts. This finding suggests that allotransplanted vascularized bone in fVCAs may not be a primary target of chronic rejection processes that compromise bone volume stability and functionality. Bone volume changes are likely influenced by multiple factors, such as tooth loss, nutrition, chronic immunosuppression (e.g., steroids), mechanical stress/load, varying bone remodeling rates, and other medical comorbidities. Further research is needed to clarify the factors affecting bone volume and remodeling after fVCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"101 ","pages":"Pages 220-230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524007277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The long-term stability of allograft or native bone in facial vascularized composite allograft (fVCA) recipients is unclear. This study quantified long-term bone volume changes in facial transplants.

Methods

Computed tomography scans of eight fVCA recipients (2011–2023) were analyzed with Materialise Mimics. Native bone (soft tissue-only VCAs, n=4) and allotransplanted bone (n=4) were compared. Median bone volumes were assessed for significance using the WilcoxonRanked-Sum Test.

Results

Mean follow-up was 10 years (range 5–13). A significant median decrease in both mandibular (−6520 mm3; p=0.0078) and maxillary (−3548 mm3; p=0.0078) bone volumes was seen in all patients, irrespective of bone origin. Median bone volume loss was −9.92% in the bony allograft cohort and −22.60% in the soft tissue-only cohort, respectively. The histopathological analysis of the limited samples (n=2) showed physiological bone even after ten years.

Conclusion

Patients with allotransplanted bone showed less pronounced volume loss compared to those with native bone receiving soft tissue-only allografts. This finding suggests that allotransplanted vascularized bone in fVCAs may not be a primary target of chronic rejection processes that compromise bone volume stability and functionality. Bone volume changes are likely influenced by multiple factors, such as tooth loss, nutrition, chronic immunosuppression (e.g., steroids), mechanical stress/load, varying bone remodeling rates, and other medical comorbidities. Further research is needed to clarify the factors affecting bone volume and remodeling after fVCA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Gender parity at the podium in UK plastic surgery conferences Commentary on Gender Parity at the Podium in UK Plastic Surgery Conferences Gender parity at the podium in UK plastic surgery conferences: Commentary Commentary on “Oestrogen hormone therapy stabilizes lateral hairline in transfeminine patients: Implications for facial feminization surgery”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1