Changing the understanding of crop production: Integrating ecosystem services into the production function

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108526
Anne Sophie Dietrich , Valeria Carini , Giulia Vico , Riccardo Bommarco , Helena Hansson
{"title":"Changing the understanding of crop production: Integrating ecosystem services into the production function","authors":"Anne Sophie Dietrich ,&nbsp;Valeria Carini ,&nbsp;Giulia Vico ,&nbsp;Riccardo Bommarco ,&nbsp;Helena Hansson","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecosystem services, such as weed and pest regulation provided by biodiversity, are vital for sustainable crop production. However, the economic contributions of biodiversity are often overlooked in commercial markets due to the absence of market prices. This complicates quantification and comparison with physical capital, leading to poor economic decisions. To improve the economic understanding of crop production, we combine economic and ecological analyses and develop a structural production economic model that accounts for ecosystem services' contributions to crop yields. Our structural crop production function integrates both anthropogenic inputs and ecosystem services, quantifying production possibilities along a spectrum from input-intensive to ecosystem service-based management practices. The model explicitly depicts resource allocation decisions across labour, physical capital, and intermediate inputs. To mitigate and reverse biodiversity stressors in intensive agriculture, alternative management practices that maintain productivity while reducing reliance on polluting inputs are essential. We review and recommend economic and ecological indicators, ranging from ideal measurements to available proxies, for model estimation, addressing the trade-offs between accuracy, feasibility, and data collection costs. Our analysis emphasises the need for comprehensive information to operationalise the understanding of productivity and substitutability between ecosystem services and biodiversity-adverse inputs such as agrochemicals and energy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108526"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystem services, such as weed and pest regulation provided by biodiversity, are vital for sustainable crop production. However, the economic contributions of biodiversity are often overlooked in commercial markets due to the absence of market prices. This complicates quantification and comparison with physical capital, leading to poor economic decisions. To improve the economic understanding of crop production, we combine economic and ecological analyses and develop a structural production economic model that accounts for ecosystem services' contributions to crop yields. Our structural crop production function integrates both anthropogenic inputs and ecosystem services, quantifying production possibilities along a spectrum from input-intensive to ecosystem service-based management practices. The model explicitly depicts resource allocation decisions across labour, physical capital, and intermediate inputs. To mitigate and reverse biodiversity stressors in intensive agriculture, alternative management practices that maintain productivity while reducing reliance on polluting inputs are essential. We review and recommend economic and ecological indicators, ranging from ideal measurements to available proxies, for model estimation, addressing the trade-offs between accuracy, feasibility, and data collection costs. Our analysis emphasises the need for comprehensive information to operationalise the understanding of productivity and substitutability between ecosystem services and biodiversity-adverse inputs such as agrochemicals and energy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改变对作物生产的认识:将生态系统服务融入生产功能
生态系统服务,如生物多样性提供的杂草和病虫害控制,对可持续作物生产至关重要。然而,由于缺乏市场价格,生物多样性的经济贡献在商业市场上往往被忽视。这使得量化和与实物资本的比较变得复杂,从而导致糟糕的经济决策。为了提高对作物生产的经济认识,我们将经济和生态分析结合起来,建立了一个结构性的生产经济模型,该模型考虑了生态系统服务对作物产量的贡献。我们的结构性作物生产功能整合了人为投入和生态系统服务,量化了从投入密集型到基于生态系统服务的管理实践的一系列生产可能性。该模型明确地描述了劳动力、实物资本和中间投入之间的资源分配决策。为了减轻和扭转集约化农业中的生物多样性压力源,必须采用在保持生产力的同时减少对污染投入品依赖的替代管理做法。我们回顾并推荐经济和生态指标,从理想的测量到可用的代理,用于模型估计,解决准确性,可行性和数据收集成本之间的权衡。我们的分析强调,需要全面的信息来实现对生态系统服务和生物多样性不利投入(如农用化学品和能源)之间的生产力和可替代性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Private and public appeals in promoting impure public goods: Evidence from a field experiment with farmers Eliciting 10% of semi-natural habitats on farmland for biodiversity: Recommendations for cost-effective policy Guiding private afforestation to raise public goods provision: Understanding farmers' multi-dimensional preferences for trees in India Who gets credit for reduced deforestation? Evaluating additionality in subnational jurisdictional REDD+ under national policy reforms in Indonesia Incentive and framing effects on collaboration norms: Experimental evidence from participatory rangeland management in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1