“Path of the Heart” (The BPROAD Study) Addresses Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure for Patients With Diabetes

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Diabetes Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1111/1753-0407.70053
Ning Guang
{"title":"“Path of the Heart” (The BPROAD Study) Addresses Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure for Patients With Diabetes","authors":"Ning Guang","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Awaiting my presentation at the centennial gathering of the American Heart Association (AHA) in Chicago, I opened my diary once again, particularly the one dated February 23, 2019, which reads, “After two years of meticulous preparation, the Path of the Heart research initiative has finally commenced.” The Path of the Heart refers to the BPROAD study, which has garnered significant acclaim due to its presentation at the Late-Breaking Science session of the AHA and concurrent publication in the prestigious <i>New England Journal of Medicine</i> [<span>1</span>]. Yet, few are acquainted with the trepidation that marked the inception of this endeavor 5 years prior, the indecision that lingered during the 2-year preparation phase, or the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic throughout the study's execution. I extend my profound admiration and gratitude to the team led by Prof. Wang Weiqing, with Bi Yufang, Xu Yu, and Li Mian at the helm of the core research group, for their indomitable spirit and the resounding success of the study.</p><p>Hypertension affects 23.2% of the adult Chinese population, with a staggering half of diabetes patients also suffering from hypertension. Hypertension has emerged as the preeminent cause of mortality and disability among diabetes. Consequently, blood pressure management has become equally as imperative as glycemic control in the therapeutic strategies for diabetes in China. However, the optimal target for blood pressure reduction remains elusive. While the SPRINT study demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiovascular events with systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg in hypertensive patients without diabetes [<span>2, 3</span>], the ACCORD study failed to observe similar benefits in diabetes patients. Besides, the ACCORD study was a 2 × 2 factorial-design study examining both blood pressure and glucose control [<span>4</span>]. Therefore, the target for blood pressure reduction in diabetes patients has become an unresolved issue, casting a shadow of confusion over clinical practice.</p><p>In light of this, the team led by Wang Weiqing and Bi Yufang from Ruijin Hospital has spearheaded the BPROAD study [<span>5, 6</span>]. This nationwide, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial made its debut as the opening presentation at the 2024 AHA Scientific Session, marking a historic milestone for Chinese researchers in the field of cardiovascular and metabolic clinical research.</p><p>The BPROAD study has established that intensive blood pressure management targeting a systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg, as opposed to conventional management aiming for below 140 mmHg, results in a 21% reduction in the primary composite endpoint of major cardiovascular events, including non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure requiring treatment or hospitalization, and cardiovascular death, in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated systolic blood pressure and increased cardiovascular risk.</p><p>This groundbreaking research has the potential to revolutionize treatment protocols. A rough estimate suggests that with ~120 million diabetes patients in China, 70 million of whom have concomitant hypertension, reducing systolic blood pressure from 140 to 120 mmHg could avert 300 000 major cardiovascular events annually, underscoring the study's profound implications. However, stricter blood pressure control necessitates an increase in antihypertensive medication prompting the need for research into antihypertensive drug combinations more suited to diabetes patients.</p><p>The BPROAD study also revealed an increased likelihood of hypotension as blood pressure approaches normal levels, necessitating further investigation into how to manage blood pressure in diabetes patients without inducing hypotension. Another concern is electrolyte imbalances, particularly potassium. The use of diuretics raises the risk of hypokalemia, while ACE inhibitors may lead to hyperkalemia. Maintaining electrolyte balance, with a focus on normal potassium levels, is critical in the management of blood pressure in diabetes patients. Urinary albumin excretion, typically measured by the urinary albumin excretion rate or the albumin-to-creatinine ratio, is often overlooked by both patients and physicians. This is another critical parameter to consider in the use of antihypertensive drugs for diabetes patients. Therefore, it is imperative to explore blood pressure reduction strategies that are more suitable for diabetes patients, and the development of more comprehensive blood pressure reduction protocols is a research topic that warrants further exploration. Additionally, the BPROAD study noted but did not emphasize the importance of salt reduction. Given the high salt and oil content in Chinese diets, particularly in northern regions, finding dietary solutions that cater to local tastes while promoting health is another research area that requires our attention.</p><p>The publication of the BPROAD study signifies both the culmination and the genesis of further inquiry. As researchers, we stand at the intersection of resolution and revelation, for with each question answered, a multitude of new questions emerge. The pursuit of science is boundless, yet to tread the path of scientific truth is both our fortune and our duty. I extend my gratitude to all participants of the BPROAD study and to all those who have supported and shown interest in this study.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-0407.70053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Awaiting my presentation at the centennial gathering of the American Heart Association (AHA) in Chicago, I opened my diary once again, particularly the one dated February 23, 2019, which reads, “After two years of meticulous preparation, the Path of the Heart research initiative has finally commenced.” The Path of the Heart refers to the BPROAD study, which has garnered significant acclaim due to its presentation at the Late-Breaking Science session of the AHA and concurrent publication in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine [1]. Yet, few are acquainted with the trepidation that marked the inception of this endeavor 5 years prior, the indecision that lingered during the 2-year preparation phase, or the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic throughout the study's execution. I extend my profound admiration and gratitude to the team led by Prof. Wang Weiqing, with Bi Yufang, Xu Yu, and Li Mian at the helm of the core research group, for their indomitable spirit and the resounding success of the study.

Hypertension affects 23.2% of the adult Chinese population, with a staggering half of diabetes patients also suffering from hypertension. Hypertension has emerged as the preeminent cause of mortality and disability among diabetes. Consequently, blood pressure management has become equally as imperative as glycemic control in the therapeutic strategies for diabetes in China. However, the optimal target for blood pressure reduction remains elusive. While the SPRINT study demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiovascular events with systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg in hypertensive patients without diabetes [2, 3], the ACCORD study failed to observe similar benefits in diabetes patients. Besides, the ACCORD study was a 2 × 2 factorial-design study examining both blood pressure and glucose control [4]. Therefore, the target for blood pressure reduction in diabetes patients has become an unresolved issue, casting a shadow of confusion over clinical practice.

In light of this, the team led by Wang Weiqing and Bi Yufang from Ruijin Hospital has spearheaded the BPROAD study [5, 6]. This nationwide, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial made its debut as the opening presentation at the 2024 AHA Scientific Session, marking a historic milestone for Chinese researchers in the field of cardiovascular and metabolic clinical research.

The BPROAD study has established that intensive blood pressure management targeting a systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg, as opposed to conventional management aiming for below 140 mmHg, results in a 21% reduction in the primary composite endpoint of major cardiovascular events, including non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure requiring treatment or hospitalization, and cardiovascular death, in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated systolic blood pressure and increased cardiovascular risk.

This groundbreaking research has the potential to revolutionize treatment protocols. A rough estimate suggests that with ~120 million diabetes patients in China, 70 million of whom have concomitant hypertension, reducing systolic blood pressure from 140 to 120 mmHg could avert 300 000 major cardiovascular events annually, underscoring the study's profound implications. However, stricter blood pressure control necessitates an increase in antihypertensive medication prompting the need for research into antihypertensive drug combinations more suited to diabetes patients.

The BPROAD study also revealed an increased likelihood of hypotension as blood pressure approaches normal levels, necessitating further investigation into how to manage blood pressure in diabetes patients without inducing hypotension. Another concern is electrolyte imbalances, particularly potassium. The use of diuretics raises the risk of hypokalemia, while ACE inhibitors may lead to hyperkalemia. Maintaining electrolyte balance, with a focus on normal potassium levels, is critical in the management of blood pressure in diabetes patients. Urinary albumin excretion, typically measured by the urinary albumin excretion rate or the albumin-to-creatinine ratio, is often overlooked by both patients and physicians. This is another critical parameter to consider in the use of antihypertensive drugs for diabetes patients. Therefore, it is imperative to explore blood pressure reduction strategies that are more suitable for diabetes patients, and the development of more comprehensive blood pressure reduction protocols is a research topic that warrants further exploration. Additionally, the BPROAD study noted but did not emphasize the importance of salt reduction. Given the high salt and oil content in Chinese diets, particularly in northern regions, finding dietary solutions that cater to local tastes while promoting health is another research area that requires our attention.

The publication of the BPROAD study signifies both the culmination and the genesis of further inquiry. As researchers, we stand at the intersection of resolution and revelation, for with each question answered, a multitude of new questions emerge. The pursuit of science is boundless, yet to tread the path of scientific truth is both our fortune and our duty. I extend my gratitude to all participants of the BPROAD study and to all those who have supported and shown interest in this study.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“心脏之路”(BPROAD研究)探讨糖尿病患者的最佳收缩压。
等待我在芝加哥举行的美国心脏协会(AHA)百年纪念大会上的演讲时,我再次打开了日记,尤其是2019年2月23日的那本,上面写着:“经过两年的精心准备,心脏研究之路终于开始了。”“心脏之路”指的是BPROAD研究,该研究由于在美国心脏协会的最新科学会议上发表,并同时在著名的新英格兰医学杂志上发表,因此获得了极大的赞誉。然而,很少有人知道五年前这项工作开始时的恐慌,两年准备阶段的优柔寡断,或者在研究执行过程中COVID-19大流行带来的挑战。我对王维青教授领导的团队,以毕玉芳、徐宇、李勉为核心研究小组的坚韧不拔的精神和研究的圆满成功表示深深的钦佩和感谢。23.2%的中国成年人患有高血压,其中一半的糖尿病患者同时患有高血压。高血压已成为糖尿病患者死亡和残疾的主要原因。因此,在中国糖尿病的治疗策略中,血压管理与血糖控制一样重要。然而,降低血压的最佳目标仍然难以捉摸。SPRINT研究显示收缩压低于120 mmHg的高血压无糖尿病患者心血管事件显著减少[2,3],ACCORD研究未能在糖尿病患者中观察到类似的益处。此外,ACCORD研究是一项2 × 2因子设计研究,检查血压和血糖控制[4]。因此,糖尿病患者的降压目标成为一个悬而未决的问题,给临床实践蒙上了一层混乱的阴影。鉴于此,瑞金医院王维青、毕玉芳团队率先开展了BPROAD研究[5,6]。这项全国性、多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照临床试验在2024年美国心脏协会科学会议上首次亮相,标志着中国研究人员在心血管和代谢临床研究领域的历史性里程碑。BPROAD研究已经证实,与传统的收缩压控制在140 mmHg以下相比,以收缩压低于120 mmHg为目标的强化血压管理可使主要心血管事件的主要复合终点降低21%,包括非致死性卒中、非致死性心肌梗死、需要治疗或住院的心力衰竭以及心血管性死亡。2型糖尿病患者收缩压升高,心血管风险增加。这项开创性的研究有可能彻底改变治疗方案。粗略估计,中国约有1.2亿糖尿病患者,其中7000万伴有高血压,将收缩压从140降至120 mmHg,每年可避免30万例主要心血管事件,强调了该研究的深远意义。然而,更严格的血压控制需要增加抗高血压药物的使用,这促使人们需要研究更适合糖尿病患者的抗高血压药物组合。BPROAD研究还显示,当血压接近正常水平时,低血压的可能性增加,因此有必要进一步研究如何在不诱导低血压的情况下控制糖尿病患者的血压。另一个担忧是电解质失衡,尤其是钾。利尿剂的使用增加了低钾血症的风险,而ACE抑制剂可能导致高钾血症。维持电解质平衡,重点是维持正常的钾水平,对糖尿病患者的血压管理至关重要。尿白蛋白排泄,通常通过尿白蛋白排泄率或白蛋白与肌酐比值来测量,经常被患者和医生所忽视。这是糖尿病患者使用降压药时需要考虑的另一个关键参数。因此,探索更适合糖尿病患者的降压策略势在必行,制定更全面的降压方案是一个值得进一步探索的研究课题。此外,BPROAD的研究注意到但没有强调减少盐的重要性。考虑到中国人(特别是北方地区)饮食中盐和油的含量很高,寻找既符合当地口味又促进健康的饮食解决方案是另一个需要我们关注的研究领域。 BPROAD研究报告的发表标志着进一步研究的高潮和开端。作为研究人员,我们站在解决和启示的交叉点上,因为每回答一个问题,就会出现大量的新问题。科学的追求是无限的,踏上科学真理的道路既是我们的幸运,也是我们的责任。我要感谢所有BPROAD研究的参与者,以及所有支持和关心本研究的人。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes
Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes (JDB) devotes itself to diabetes research, therapeutics, and education. It aims to involve researchers and practitioners in a dialogue between East and West via all aspects of epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes, including the molecular, biochemical, and physiological aspects of diabetes. The Editorial team is international with a unique mix of Asian and Western participation. The Editors welcome submissions in form of original research articles, images, novel case reports and correspondence, and will solicit reviews, point-counterpoint, commentaries, editorials, news highlights, and educational content.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Glimepiride, Voglibose, and Metformin ER in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Active-Controlled Study Genomic Structural Equation Modeling Reveals Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Genetic Architecture Commentary on the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative Learning Session November 2025 Abstracts The Role of Negative Pressure Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Meta-Analysis Association Between Socioeconomic Status and the Prevalence of Metabolic Diseases: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1