Detectability of Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET for Nodal Metastases in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1097/RLU.0000000000005686
Xiaoyi Guo, Jiayue Liu, Shiyu Lin, Xinyu Gui, Jin Ding, Teli Liu, Nina Zhou, Suping Li, Hua Zhu, Zhi Yang
{"title":"Detectability of Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET for Nodal Metastases in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.","authors":"Xiaoyi Guo, Jiayue Liu, Shiyu Lin, Xinyu Gui, Jin Ding, Teli Liu, Nina Zhou, Suping Li, Hua Zhu, Zhi Yang","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG for detecting nodal metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer on PET/CT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 62 participants with HER2-positive breast cancer underwent both Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Participants were pathologically confirmed as HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with gene amplification on FISH). Three independent readers visually assessed uptake of tracers on imaging. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of nodal metastases was assessed using c-statistics. The lesion uptakes were quantified by SUVmax and target-to-background ratio (TBR) and compared using the general linear mixed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings showed nodal metastases in 33 (53%) participants, including 45% only with regional nodal metastasis and 55% with nonregional nodal metastasis. On per-patient level, the sensitivity and specificity of Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG based on the majority reads were 0.97, 0.97, and 0.85, 0.77, respectively. Five participants were visualized only on Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH. Seven participants with high uptake only on 18F-FDG PET/CT were confirmed to be inflammatory uptake by pathological results and later imaging follow-up. On per-lesion level, Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more axillary (98.8% vs 70.2%), extra-axillary (100% vs 61.7%), and nonregional (99.1% vs 67.0%) lymph nodal metastases than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Additionally, Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more nodal metastases small than 10 mm than 18F-FDG PET/CT (198 vs 125, 99.5% vs 62.8%). The median SUVmax and TBR of regional or nonregional nodal metastases at Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH were all higher than those on 18F-FDG (range of median SUVmax, 8.0-11.4 vs 2.3-5.6; P range, <0.001-0.007; range of median TBR, 7.3-16.3 vs 2.9-5.3; P range, <0.001). No adverse reactions related to imaging agents were observed in all participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more regional and nonregional lymph nodal metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer than on 18F-FDG PET/CT, especially for lesions small than 10 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG for detecting nodal metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer on PET/CT.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, 62 participants with HER2-positive breast cancer underwent both Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Participants were pathologically confirmed as HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with gene amplification on FISH). Three independent readers visually assessed uptake of tracers on imaging. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of nodal metastases was assessed using c-statistics. The lesion uptakes were quantified by SUVmax and target-to-background ratio (TBR) and compared using the general linear mixed model.

Results: The findings showed nodal metastases in 33 (53%) participants, including 45% only with regional nodal metastasis and 55% with nonregional nodal metastasis. On per-patient level, the sensitivity and specificity of Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG based on the majority reads were 0.97, 0.97, and 0.85, 0.77, respectively. Five participants were visualized only on Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH. Seven participants with high uptake only on 18F-FDG PET/CT were confirmed to be inflammatory uptake by pathological results and later imaging follow-up. On per-lesion level, Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more axillary (98.8% vs 70.2%), extra-axillary (100% vs 61.7%), and nonregional (99.1% vs 67.0%) lymph nodal metastases than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Additionally, Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more nodal metastases small than 10 mm than 18F-FDG PET/CT (198 vs 125, 99.5% vs 62.8%). The median SUVmax and TBR of regional or nonregional nodal metastases at Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH were all higher than those on 18F-FDG (range of median SUVmax, 8.0-11.4 vs 2.3-5.6; P range, <0.001-0.007; range of median TBR, 7.3-16.3 vs 2.9-5.3; P range, <0.001). No adverse reactions related to imaging agents were observed in all participants.

Conclusions: Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more regional and nonregional lymph nodal metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer than on 18F-FDG PET/CT, especially for lesions small than 10 mm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
期刊最新文献
Positive 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MRI and Negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Incidental Appendiceal Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma. FDG Uptake in Brown Adipose Tissue Activated by a Long-Acting β2-Adrenergic Receptor Agonist Inhaler Prescribed for Bronchial Asthma. Hypertrophic Olivary Degeneration: Deafferentation With a Difference on FDG PET/CT. Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Breast With 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Upstaging of Invasive Lobular Cancer With FES PET/CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1