Corrected Axial Length and Choroidal Thickness: A Correlation Analysis for Scientific Purposes.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.3390/jpm15010015
Marco Gioia, Maddalena De Bernardo, Ferdinando Cione, Martina De Luca, Nicola Rosa
{"title":"Corrected Axial Length and Choroidal Thickness: A Correlation Analysis for Scientific Purposes.","authors":"Marco Gioia, Maddalena De Bernardo, Ferdinando Cione, Martina De Luca, Nicola Rosa","doi":"10.3390/jpm15010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Choroidal thickness (ChT) is an important measurement for evaluating eye and systemic disorders, but it is influenced by numerous elements, especially axial length (AL). It is known that the presence of a linear relationship between ChT and AL exists, but recently it has been shown that the AL measurement obtained with the current optical biometry is not very precise and needs to be corrected. This study aimed to verify if a similar correlation also persists with this corrected AL (ALc). <b>Methods:</b> All subjects underwent a complete eye examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) with enhanced depth image (EDI) mode and AL measurement with IOLMaster. After a normality check of the data, the correlations between ChT with AL and ALc were investigated through the Pearson correlation coefficient. <i>p</i> values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> In total, 100 eyes of 50 healthy patients were evaluated. The mean AL was 24.36 ± 1.23 mm and mean ALc was 24.25 ± 1.22 mm. The mean nasal ChT, subfoveal ChT, and temporal ChT were, respectively, 250.57 ± 93.93 µm, 307.18 ± 101.66 µm, and 313.72 ± 88.86 µm. A significant negative linear correlation was found by comparing both AL and ALc to ChT (all r < -0.500, all <i>p</i> < 0.050). The negative linear correlation was stronger between nasal ChT and both AL and ALc (all r = -0.581). <b>Conclusions:</b> Through OCT and optical biometry, we confirmed that a statistically significant correlation persists between ALc and ChT, equal to the uncorrected AL. On these bases, in ChT studies or protocols, we recommend stratifying population according to ALc because linear correlation is still present; however, the cut-off values should be changed according to the systematic errors in optical biometry. In addition, both AL and ChT changes should be evaluated according to ALc.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Choroidal thickness (ChT) is an important measurement for evaluating eye and systemic disorders, but it is influenced by numerous elements, especially axial length (AL). It is known that the presence of a linear relationship between ChT and AL exists, but recently it has been shown that the AL measurement obtained with the current optical biometry is not very precise and needs to be corrected. This study aimed to verify if a similar correlation also persists with this corrected AL (ALc). Methods: All subjects underwent a complete eye examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) with enhanced depth image (EDI) mode and AL measurement with IOLMaster. After a normality check of the data, the correlations between ChT with AL and ALc were investigated through the Pearson correlation coefficient. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: In total, 100 eyes of 50 healthy patients were evaluated. The mean AL was 24.36 ± 1.23 mm and mean ALc was 24.25 ± 1.22 mm. The mean nasal ChT, subfoveal ChT, and temporal ChT were, respectively, 250.57 ± 93.93 µm, 307.18 ± 101.66 µm, and 313.72 ± 88.86 µm. A significant negative linear correlation was found by comparing both AL and ALc to ChT (all r < -0.500, all p < 0.050). The negative linear correlation was stronger between nasal ChT and both AL and ALc (all r = -0.581). Conclusions: Through OCT and optical biometry, we confirmed that a statistically significant correlation persists between ALc and ChT, equal to the uncorrected AL. On these bases, in ChT studies or protocols, we recommend stratifying population according to ALc because linear correlation is still present; however, the cut-off values should be changed according to the systematic errors in optical biometry. In addition, both AL and ChT changes should be evaluated according to ALc.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Hepatic Function and Chemotherapy-Induced Side Effects Between Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD), Topotecan (TOPO), and Gemcitabine in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PROC). Fundus Photography-Based Distribution of Retinal Hemorrhages in Newborns: Implications for Underlying Mechanisms. Predictive Value of First Amniotic Sac IL-6 and Maternal Blood CRP for Emergency Cerclage Success in Twin Pregnancies. Musculoskeletal Diseases: Aetiology, Clinical Implications, Rehabilitation and Treatment. Navigating the Uncertainty of B3 Breast Lesions: Diagnostic Challenges and Evolving Management Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1