Corrected Axial Length and Choroidal Thickness: A Correlation Analysis for Scientific Purposes.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.3390/jpm15010015
Marco Gioia, Maddalena De Bernardo, Ferdinando Cione, Martina De Luca, Nicola Rosa
{"title":"Corrected Axial Length and Choroidal Thickness: A Correlation Analysis for Scientific Purposes.","authors":"Marco Gioia, Maddalena De Bernardo, Ferdinando Cione, Martina De Luca, Nicola Rosa","doi":"10.3390/jpm15010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Choroidal thickness (ChT) is an important measurement for evaluating eye and systemic disorders, but it is influenced by numerous elements, especially axial length (AL). It is known that the presence of a linear relationship between ChT and AL exists, but recently it has been shown that the AL measurement obtained with the current optical biometry is not very precise and needs to be corrected. This study aimed to verify if a similar correlation also persists with this corrected AL (ALc). <b>Methods:</b> All subjects underwent a complete eye examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) with enhanced depth image (EDI) mode and AL measurement with IOLMaster. After a normality check of the data, the correlations between ChT with AL and ALc were investigated through the Pearson correlation coefficient. <i>p</i> values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> In total, 100 eyes of 50 healthy patients were evaluated. The mean AL was 24.36 ± 1.23 mm and mean ALc was 24.25 ± 1.22 mm. The mean nasal ChT, subfoveal ChT, and temporal ChT were, respectively, 250.57 ± 93.93 µm, 307.18 ± 101.66 µm, and 313.72 ± 88.86 µm. A significant negative linear correlation was found by comparing both AL and ALc to ChT (all r < -0.500, all <i>p</i> < 0.050). The negative linear correlation was stronger between nasal ChT and both AL and ALc (all r = -0.581). <b>Conclusions:</b> Through OCT and optical biometry, we confirmed that a statistically significant correlation persists between ALc and ChT, equal to the uncorrected AL. On these bases, in ChT studies or protocols, we recommend stratifying population according to ALc because linear correlation is still present; however, the cut-off values should be changed according to the systematic errors in optical biometry. In addition, both AL and ChT changes should be evaluated according to ALc.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Choroidal thickness (ChT) is an important measurement for evaluating eye and systemic disorders, but it is influenced by numerous elements, especially axial length (AL). It is known that the presence of a linear relationship between ChT and AL exists, but recently it has been shown that the AL measurement obtained with the current optical biometry is not very precise and needs to be corrected. This study aimed to verify if a similar correlation also persists with this corrected AL (ALc). Methods: All subjects underwent a complete eye examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) with enhanced depth image (EDI) mode and AL measurement with IOLMaster. After a normality check of the data, the correlations between ChT with AL and ALc were investigated through the Pearson correlation coefficient. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: In total, 100 eyes of 50 healthy patients were evaluated. The mean AL was 24.36 ± 1.23 mm and mean ALc was 24.25 ± 1.22 mm. The mean nasal ChT, subfoveal ChT, and temporal ChT were, respectively, 250.57 ± 93.93 µm, 307.18 ± 101.66 µm, and 313.72 ± 88.86 µm. A significant negative linear correlation was found by comparing both AL and ALc to ChT (all r < -0.500, all p < 0.050). The negative linear correlation was stronger between nasal ChT and both AL and ALc (all r = -0.581). Conclusions: Through OCT and optical biometry, we confirmed that a statistically significant correlation persists between ALc and ChT, equal to the uncorrected AL. On these bases, in ChT studies or protocols, we recommend stratifying population according to ALc because linear correlation is still present; however, the cut-off values should be changed according to the systematic errors in optical biometry. In addition, both AL and ChT changes should be evaluated according to ALc.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校正轴向长度和脉络膜厚度:科学目的的相关性分析。
目的:脉络膜厚度(Choroidal thickness, ChT)是评价眼部及全身疾病的重要指标,但其受多种因素影响,尤其是轴向长度(axial length, AL)。众所周知,ChT和AL之间存在线性关系,但最近有研究表明,目前光学生物测定法获得的AL测量值不是很精确,需要进行校正。本研究旨在验证这种校正后的AL (ALc)是否也存在类似的相关性。方法:所有受试者都进行了全面的眼部检查,包括增强深度图像(EDI)模式的光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和IOLMaster的AL测量。在对数据进行正态性检验后,通过Pearson相关系数研究ChT与AL和ALc之间的相关性。P值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:对50例健康患者共100只眼进行了评价。平均AL为24.36±1.23 mm,平均ALc为24.25±1.22 mm。鼻部ChT、中央凹下ChT和颞部ChT的平均值分别为250.57±93.93µm、307.18±101.66µm和313.72±88.86µm。AL和ALc与ChT呈显著的负线性相关(均r < -0.500, p < 0.050)。鼻腔ChT与AL、ALc均呈较强的负线性相关(均r = -0.581)。结论:通过OCT和光学生物测量,我们证实ALc和ChT之间存在统计学上显著的相关性,等于未校正的AL。基于此,在ChT研究或方案中,我们建议根据ALc进行人群分层,因为线性相关性仍然存在;但是,在光学生物识别中,需要根据系统误差改变截止值。此外,应根据ALc来评价AL和ChT的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
Coronary Atherosclerosis in Master Athletes: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges. Comparative Quality Assessment of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education on Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Therapy. Targeted and Personalized Therapy for Difficult Benign Brain Tumors: A Review. Leveraging Large and Diverse Biobanks to Evaluate Gene-Disease Associations in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Targeted Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Approaches and Novel Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1