Hybrid remote and in-clinic maternal-fetal surveillance for women with gestational diabetes: A prospective pilot study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.16148
Michal Axelrod, Hila Lahav Ezra, Esther Galler, Omer Nir, Keren Ofir, Galia Barkai, Eyal Sivan, Shali Mazaki-Tovi, Abraham Tsur
{"title":"Hybrid remote and in-clinic maternal-fetal surveillance for women with gestational diabetes: A prospective pilot study","authors":"Michal Axelrod,&nbsp;Hila Lahav Ezra,&nbsp;Esther Galler,&nbsp;Omer Nir,&nbsp;Keren Ofir,&nbsp;Galia Barkai,&nbsp;Eyal Sivan,&nbsp;Shali Mazaki-Tovi,&nbsp;Abraham Tsur","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study explores a hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for gestational diabetes (GD), integrating virtual visits seamlessly with in-clinic assessments. We assessed the feasibility, time efficiency, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes to facilitate wider adoption of maternal-fetal telemedicine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a 4-week prospective study involving 20 women with GD at ≥32 weeks of pregnancy, alternating between remote and in-clinic weekly visits. Remote assessments began with women self-measuring vital signs and using a digital urine dipstick. The remote encounter started with a midwife performing anamnesis and remotely connecting women to the fetal nonstress test. A physician concluded the meeting with remote sonographic assessment of amniotic fluid maximal vertical pocket that together with the nonstress test provided the modified biophysical assessment as well as a video encounter and ongoing glycemic control assessment. We assessed the feasibility of remote visits, compared visit durations, evaluated women's satisfaction using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire, examined glucose documentation adherence during hybrid care compared with the following period until birth, and assessed GD-related clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Remote visits had a success rate of 97.4% (38 of 39), with significantly shorter durations compared with in-clinic visits (median 59.0 min vs. 159.0 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Women expressed high satisfaction (6.6 of 7), and adherence with recording fasting glucose values during the study period was significantly higher than the following period until birth (92.2% vs. 61.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Notably, none required induction of labor for glycemic control imbalance, and there were no cases of macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, or neonatal hypoglycemia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for GD demonstrated feasibility, safety, time efficiency, improved patient satisfaction, and enhanced glycemic control adherence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":"170 1","pages":"430-438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.16148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study explores a hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for gestational diabetes (GD), integrating virtual visits seamlessly with in-clinic assessments. We assessed the feasibility, time efficiency, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes to facilitate wider adoption of maternal-fetal telemedicine.

Methods

We conducted a 4-week prospective study involving 20 women with GD at ≥32 weeks of pregnancy, alternating between remote and in-clinic weekly visits. Remote assessments began with women self-measuring vital signs and using a digital urine dipstick. The remote encounter started with a midwife performing anamnesis and remotely connecting women to the fetal nonstress test. A physician concluded the meeting with remote sonographic assessment of amniotic fluid maximal vertical pocket that together with the nonstress test provided the modified biophysical assessment as well as a video encounter and ongoing glycemic control assessment. We assessed the feasibility of remote visits, compared visit durations, evaluated women's satisfaction using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire, examined glucose documentation adherence during hybrid care compared with the following period until birth, and assessed GD-related clinical outcomes.

Results

Remote visits had a success rate of 97.4% (38 of 39), with significantly shorter durations compared with in-clinic visits (median 59.0 min vs. 159.0 min, P < 0.001). Women expressed high satisfaction (6.6 of 7), and adherence with recording fasting glucose values during the study period was significantly higher than the following period until birth (92.2% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.001). Notably, none required induction of labor for glycemic control imbalance, and there were no cases of macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, or neonatal hypoglycemia.

Conclusion

The hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for GD demonstrated feasibility, safety, time efficiency, improved patient satisfaction, and enhanced glycemic control adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期糖尿病妇女的远程和临床混合母胎监测:一项前瞻性试点研究。
目的:本研究探讨了一种将虚拟访问与临床评估无缝结合的妊娠期糖尿病(GD)母胎护理的混合方法。我们评估了可行性、时间效率、患者满意度和临床结果,以促进母胎远程医疗的广泛采用。方法:我们进行了一项为期4周的前瞻性研究,涉及20名妊娠≥32周的GD妇女,每周轮流进行远程和门诊就诊。远程评估开始于女性自我测量生命体征,并使用数字尿量尺。远程接触开始于助产士进行记忆,并远程将妇女与胎儿无压力测试联系起来。一名医生在会议结束时对羊水最大垂直袋进行了远程超声评估,该评估与非应激试验一起提供了改进的生物物理评估、视频会面和持续的血糖控制评估。我们评估了远程就诊的可行性,比较了就诊时间,使用远程医疗可用性问卷评估了妇女的满意度,检查了混合护理期间的血糖记录依从性,并将其与分娩前的随访期进行了比较,并评估了gd相关的临床结果。结果:远程就诊的成功率为97.4%(38 / 39),与门诊就诊相比,远程就诊的持续时间显著缩短(中位59.0分钟vs. 159.0分钟)。结论:采用混合方法进行GD的母胎护理具有可行性、安全性、时间效率,提高了患者满意度,并增强了血糖控制的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
The association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury in primiparous women: A propensity score-matched cohort study. Risks of misuse and overuse of Kegel exercises in postpartum and postmenopausal urinary incontinence. Fluorescein colposcopy-A more specific diagnostic method for detection of high-grade cervical precancer lesions than acetic acid. Efficacy and safety of fractional microablative radiofrequency versus topical estriol in treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A pilot study. Oxytocin versus carbetocin for preventing postpartum hemorrhage in patients with polyhydramnios during cesarean delivery: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1