Breast MRI to Screen Women With Extremely Dense Breasts

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1002/jmri.29716
Carla Sitges MD, Ritse M. Mann MD, PhD
{"title":"Breast MRI to Screen Women With Extremely Dense Breasts","authors":"Carla Sitges MD,&nbsp;Ritse M. Mann MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>Women with extremely dense breasts are at a higher risk of breast cancer, and the sensitivity of mammography in this group is reduced due to the masking effect of overlapping tissue. This review examines supplemental screening methods to improve detection in this population, with a focus on MRI. Morphologic techniques offer limited benefits, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) shows inconsistent results, and ultrasound (US), while improving cancer detection rates (CDR), results in a higher rate of false positives. Functional imaging techniques show better performance, molecular breast imaging increases CDR but is limited in availability, and contrast-enhanced mammography is promising, with good results and as an accessible technique, but requires further validation. MRI, with sensitivity ranging from 81% to 100%, is the most supported modality. Despite strong evidence for MRI in this population, high costs, use of contrast, and longer scan times hinder widespread use. Abbreviated MRI protocols aim to overcome these barriers by reducing costs and scan duration. As personalized screening becomes a future focus, MRI remains the most effective option for women with extremely dense breasts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>1</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Technical Efficacy</h3>\n \n <p>Stage 5</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":"62 1","pages":"58-72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmri.29716","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.29716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women with extremely dense breasts are at a higher risk of breast cancer, and the sensitivity of mammography in this group is reduced due to the masking effect of overlapping tissue. This review examines supplemental screening methods to improve detection in this population, with a focus on MRI. Morphologic techniques offer limited benefits, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) shows inconsistent results, and ultrasound (US), while improving cancer detection rates (CDR), results in a higher rate of false positives. Functional imaging techniques show better performance, molecular breast imaging increases CDR but is limited in availability, and contrast-enhanced mammography is promising, with good results and as an accessible technique, but requires further validation. MRI, with sensitivity ranging from 81% to 100%, is the most supported modality. Despite strong evidence for MRI in this population, high costs, use of contrast, and longer scan times hinder widespread use. Abbreviated MRI protocols aim to overcome these barriers by reducing costs and scan duration. As personalized screening becomes a future focus, MRI remains the most effective option for women with extremely dense breasts.

Level of Evidence

1

Technical Efficacy

Stage 5

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳房核磁共振成像筛查乳房密度极高的女性。
乳房密度极高的女性患乳腺癌的风险更高,由于重叠组织的掩蔽作用,这一群体的乳房x光检查的灵敏度降低。本综述探讨了补充筛查方法,以提高这一人群的检测,重点是MRI。形态学技术提供的益处有限,数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)显示不一致的结果,超声(US)虽然提高了癌症检出率(CDR),但导致更高的假阳性率。功能成像技术表现出更好的性能,乳房分子成像增加了CDR,但可用性有限,对比增强乳房x线摄影很有希望,结果很好,是一种可获得的技术,但需要进一步验证。MRI的灵敏度为81% ~ 100%,是最受支持的诊断方式。尽管MRI在这一人群中有强有力的证据,但高昂的费用、使用造影剂和较长的扫描时间阻碍了其广泛应用。简化的MRI方案旨在通过降低成本和扫描时间来克服这些障碍。随着个性化筛查成为未来的焦点,核磁共振成像仍然是乳房密度极高的女性最有效的选择。证据等级:1,技术有效性:第5阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial for Quantitative Real-Time MRI for the Assessment of Gastric Motility. Radiogenomics in Leptomeningeal Metastasis of Lung Adenocarcinoma: MRI Patterns and Survival Outcomes Following Ommaya Reservoir Chemotherapy. Editorial for "Analysis of Upper Airway Morphology Using Four-Dimensional Dynamic MRI With Active Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation". Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Differences Between LI-RADS M Targetoid and LI-RADS M Nontargetoid Observations: A Comparative Imaging-Based Study. Editorial for "Non-Contrast Coronary MR Angiography for Myocardial Bridging: Diagnostic Accuracy and Morphologic Agreement With Photon-Counting Coronary CT Angiography".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1