Prostatic Artery Embolization in Elderly Comorbid Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Safety, Efficacy, and Predictive Factors of Clinical Failure.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.3390/jpm15010023
Federico Zorzi, Giulio Rossin, Michelangelo Digregorio, Simone Lavecchia, Andrea Piasentin, Fabio Traunero, Carmelo Morreale, Michele Rizzo, Tommaso Cai, Carlo Trombetta, Alessandro Zucchi, Giovanni Liguori
{"title":"Prostatic Artery Embolization in Elderly Comorbid Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Safety, Efficacy, and Predictive Factors of Clinical Failure.","authors":"Federico Zorzi, Giulio Rossin, Michelangelo Digregorio, Simone Lavecchia, Andrea Piasentin, Fabio Traunero, Carmelo Morreale, Michele Rizzo, Tommaso Cai, Carlo Trombetta, Alessandro Zucchi, Giovanni Liguori","doi":"10.3390/jpm15010023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in elderly, multimorbid patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Additionally, it seeks to identify technical and clinical factors that predict clinical failure at the mid-term follow-up. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed the clinical records of 175 consecutive patients who underwent PAE. Technical success was defined as achieving embolization on at least one side. Safety was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The pre-procedural international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine (PVR) were compared with values assessed at the follow-up evaluation. Clinical failure was defined as no improvement or worsening of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) based on the IPSS at the follow-up evaluation. Univariate and multivariate regression models were applied to identify predictors of clinical failure. <b>Results</b>: 158 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 74 years (68, 79), with a median ASA score of 2 (2, 3) and a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 5 (4, 7). Follow-up assessments were carried out at a median of 12 months (0, 1). IPSS decreased by -5 points (-8, 0), QoL by -1 point (-1, 0), PV by -19 cc (-26, -8), PVR by -45 cc (-25 to -80), and PSA by -1.1 ng/mL (-2.5, -0.2) (<i>p</i> < 0.01); while Qmax improved by 4 mL/s (2, 6) (<i>p</i> < 0.01). A total of 44 patients (30.3%) experienced clinical failure, which was significantly correlated with unilateral embolization (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that higher CCI, elevated PVR, and the use of larger microspheres were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, with odds ratios of 2.17 (95% CI: 1.4-3.38), 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01-1.03), and 26.83 (95% CI: 4.81-149.8), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: PAE is a safe and effective treatment for elderly multimorbid patients with BPH. Comprehensive pre-procedural clinical assessment, incorporating the CCI and PVR, is essential to optimize treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in elderly, multimorbid patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Additionally, it seeks to identify technical and clinical factors that predict clinical failure at the mid-term follow-up. Methods: We analyzed the clinical records of 175 consecutive patients who underwent PAE. Technical success was defined as achieving embolization on at least one side. Safety was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The pre-procedural international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine (PVR) were compared with values assessed at the follow-up evaluation. Clinical failure was defined as no improvement or worsening of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) based on the IPSS at the follow-up evaluation. Univariate and multivariate regression models were applied to identify predictors of clinical failure. Results: 158 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 74 years (68, 79), with a median ASA score of 2 (2, 3) and a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 5 (4, 7). Follow-up assessments were carried out at a median of 12 months (0, 1). IPSS decreased by -5 points (-8, 0), QoL by -1 point (-1, 0), PV by -19 cc (-26, -8), PVR by -45 cc (-25 to -80), and PSA by -1.1 ng/mL (-2.5, -0.2) (p < 0.01); while Qmax improved by 4 mL/s (2, 6) (p < 0.01). A total of 44 patients (30.3%) experienced clinical failure, which was significantly correlated with unilateral embolization (p < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that higher CCI, elevated PVR, and the use of larger microspheres were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, with odds ratios of 2.17 (95% CI: 1.4-3.38), 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01-1.03), and 26.83 (95% CI: 4.81-149.8), respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions: PAE is a safe and effective treatment for elderly multimorbid patients with BPH. Comprehensive pre-procedural clinical assessment, incorporating the CCI and PVR, is essential to optimize treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Hepatic Function and Chemotherapy-Induced Side Effects Between Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD), Topotecan (TOPO), and Gemcitabine in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PROC). Fundus Photography-Based Distribution of Retinal Hemorrhages in Newborns: Implications for Underlying Mechanisms. Predictive Value of First Amniotic Sac IL-6 and Maternal Blood CRP for Emergency Cerclage Success in Twin Pregnancies. Musculoskeletal Diseases: Aetiology, Clinical Implications, Rehabilitation and Treatment. Navigating the Uncertainty of B3 Breast Lesions: Diagnostic Challenges and Evolving Management Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1