Risk Factors for Delayed (>30 Days) Readmission Following Rectal Cancer Surgery

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.037
Danish Ali MBBS , Maria Syed MD , Adriana C. Gamboa MD , Alexander T. Hawkins MD, MPH , Scott E. Regenbogen MD , Jennifer Holder-Murray MD , Paul Wise MD , Matthew F. Kalady MD , Glen C. Balch MD, MBA , Aimal Khan MD
{"title":"Risk Factors for Delayed (>30 Days) Readmission Following Rectal Cancer Surgery","authors":"Danish Ali MBBS ,&nbsp;Maria Syed MD ,&nbsp;Adriana C. Gamboa MD ,&nbsp;Alexander T. Hawkins MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Scott E. Regenbogen MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Holder-Murray MD ,&nbsp;Paul Wise MD ,&nbsp;Matthew F. Kalady MD ,&nbsp;Glen C. Balch MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Aimal Khan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Unplanned, delayed readmissions (&gt;30 ds) following oncologic surgeries can increase mortality and care costs and affect hospital quality indices. However, there is a dearth of literature on rectal cancer surgery. Hence, we aimed to assess the risk factors associated with delayed readmissions following rectal cancer surgery to improve targeted interventions, patient outcomes, and quality indices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For this case-control study, all adult patients in the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database who underwent surgery and subsequent readmission were included. Multivariable logistic regression described the association of factors associated with delayed readmission. Descriptive statistics were used to ascertain the most common causes of readmission.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1417 patients included in the analysis, 403 (28.4%) patients were readmitted postoperatively. Among these, 101 (25.1%) patients had delayed readmission. The median length of stay for early readmission was significantly longer when compared to delayed readmission (4 <em>versus</em> 2 ds, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status score &gt; II [odds ratio = 1.81] was associated with an increased risk of delayed readmissions, while intraoperative pelvic drain placement [odds ratio = 0.57] was associated with a reduced risk. Surgical site infection was the most common cause of delayed (18.4%) and early readmissions (27.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The risk of readmission following surgery for rectal cancer extends beyond the commonly tracked 30 ds, with up to a quarter of readmissions happening more than 30 ds after surgery. Surgical site infection continues to be the leading cause of both early and delayed readmission, underscoring the need to double down on infection prevention bundles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"Pages 397-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424008345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Unplanned, delayed readmissions (>30 ds) following oncologic surgeries can increase mortality and care costs and affect hospital quality indices. However, there is a dearth of literature on rectal cancer surgery. Hence, we aimed to assess the risk factors associated with delayed readmissions following rectal cancer surgery to improve targeted interventions, patient outcomes, and quality indices.

Methods

For this case-control study, all adult patients in the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database who underwent surgery and subsequent readmission were included. Multivariable logistic regression described the association of factors associated with delayed readmission. Descriptive statistics were used to ascertain the most common causes of readmission.

Results

Of the 1417 patients included in the analysis, 403 (28.4%) patients were readmitted postoperatively. Among these, 101 (25.1%) patients had delayed readmission. The median length of stay for early readmission was significantly longer when compared to delayed readmission (4 versus 2 ds, P < 0.01). American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status score > II [odds ratio = 1.81] was associated with an increased risk of delayed readmissions, while intraoperative pelvic drain placement [odds ratio = 0.57] was associated with a reduced risk. Surgical site infection was the most common cause of delayed (18.4%) and early readmissions (27.4%).

Conclusions

The risk of readmission following surgery for rectal cancer extends beyond the commonly tracked 30 ds, with up to a quarter of readmissions happening more than 30 ds after surgery. Surgical site infection continues to be the leading cause of both early and delayed readmission, underscoring the need to double down on infection prevention bundles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠癌手术后延迟(30天)再入院的危险因素
肿瘤手术后非计划的、延迟的再入院会增加死亡率和护理费用,并影响医院质量指标。然而,关于直肠癌手术的文献很少。因此,我们旨在评估与直肠癌手术后延迟再入院相关的危险因素,以改善有针对性的干预措施、患者预后和质量指标。方法:在这项病例对照研究中,纳入了美国直肠癌协会数据库中所有接受手术并随后再入院的成年患者。多变量逻辑回归描述了延迟再入院相关因素的关联。描述性统计用于确定再入院的最常见原因。结果:纳入分析的1417例患者中,403例(28.4%)患者术后再次入院。其中101例(25.1%)患者延迟再入院。与延迟再入院相比,早期再入院的中位住院时间明显更长(4 vs 2天),Pⅱ[优势比= 1.81]与延迟再入院的风险增加相关,而术中盆腔引流管放置[优势比= 0.57]与风险降低相关。手术部位感染是延迟(18.4%)和早期再入院(27.4%)最常见的原因。结论:直肠癌术后再入院的风险超出了通常追踪的30天,高达四分之一的再入院发生在手术后30天以上。手术部位感染仍然是早期和延迟再入院的主要原因,强调需要加倍投入感染预防包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
The Optimal Timing of Portal and Hepatic Vein Ligation for Increasing Liver Remnant Volume in Rats Timing of Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Nationwide Analysis Ten Year Review of Wound Culture Results and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in a Burn Center Effect of TU-100 on Colorectal Liver Metastasis in Mouse Model of MASH Strengthening Vascular Surgery Training in Sub-Saharan Africa: 1-Year Kenyan Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1