Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling in Toxicology.

IF 4.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Toxics Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.3390/toxics13010025
Bruno Pires, Gonçalo Catarro, Sofia Soares, Joana Gonçalves, Tiago Rosado, Mário Barroso, André R T S Araujo, Eugenia Gallardo
{"title":"Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling in Toxicology.","authors":"Bruno Pires, Gonçalo Catarro, Sofia Soares, Joana Gonçalves, Tiago Rosado, Mário Barroso, André R T S Araujo, Eugenia Gallardo","doi":"10.3390/toxics13010025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an emerging technique in clinical and forensic toxicology. It is recognized as a promising alternative to traditional sampling methods, offering an accurate and minimally invasive means of collecting small volumes of biological samples, such as blood, urine, and saliva. Unlike conventional methods, VAMS provides advantages in terms of sample stability, storage, and transportation, as it enables samples to be collected outside laboratory environments without requiring refrigeration. This review explores several VAMS methodologies, with a particular focus on its application for the quantification of drugs and other substances in clinical and forensic toxicology. It compares VAMS to other microsampling techniques, such as dried blood spots (DBSs), highlighting VAMS's superiority in addressing issues related to sample volume consistency and environmental impact. Despite its advantages, VAMS also presents certain limitations, including higher costs and difficulties in detecting underfilled samples. Overall, VAMS stands out as a microsampling technique with the potential to enhance patient compliance and operational efficiency, positioning itself as a viable tool for toxicological analysis in both clinical and forensic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11768451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13010025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an emerging technique in clinical and forensic toxicology. It is recognized as a promising alternative to traditional sampling methods, offering an accurate and minimally invasive means of collecting small volumes of biological samples, such as blood, urine, and saliva. Unlike conventional methods, VAMS provides advantages in terms of sample stability, storage, and transportation, as it enables samples to be collected outside laboratory environments without requiring refrigeration. This review explores several VAMS methodologies, with a particular focus on its application for the quantification of drugs and other substances in clinical and forensic toxicology. It compares VAMS to other microsampling techniques, such as dried blood spots (DBSs), highlighting VAMS's superiority in addressing issues related to sample volume consistency and environmental impact. Despite its advantages, VAMS also presents certain limitations, including higher costs and difficulties in detecting underfilled samples. Overall, VAMS stands out as a microsampling technique with the potential to enhance patient compliance and operational efficiency, positioning itself as a viable tool for toxicological analysis in both clinical and forensic contexts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毒理学中的体积吸收微采样。
体积吸收显微取样(VAMS)是临床和法医毒理学中的一项新兴技术。它被认为是传统采样方法的一种有前途的替代方法,提供了一种准确和微创的方法来收集小体积的生物样本,如血液、尿液和唾液。与传统方法不同,VAMS在样品稳定性,储存和运输方面具有优势,因为它可以在实验室环境外收集样品而无需冷藏。本综述探讨了几种VAMS方法,特别侧重于其在临床和法医毒理学中用于药物和其他物质定量的应用。它将VAMS与其他微采样技术(如干血点(DBSs))进行了比较,突出了VAMS在解决与样本量一致性和环境影响相关的问题方面的优势。尽管有优点,VAMS也有一定的局限性,包括较高的成本和检测未充份样品的困难。总的来说,VAMS作为一种微采样技术脱颖而出,具有提高患者依从性和操作效率的潜力,将自己定位为临床和法医环境中毒理学分析的可行工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
期刊最新文献
Cadmium-Induced Neuroendocrine Alterations: Gene Expression of the Kisspeptin-GnRH Axis and Delayed Puberty in Male Rats. Metabolic Disruption and Steatosis Induced by Drinking Water Disinfection Byproducts in HepG2 and HUH7 Cells. Ba-Sr-V as Geogenic and Traffic Tracers in Paediatric Hair from Urban-Industrial Spain, with Co-Located Topsoil Vanadium. PCB Exposure in Adult Male Mice Reduces Proliferating Cells in the Prostate but Minimally Alters Voiding. Associations Between Air Pollution Exposure and Gestational Weight Gain Pattern: Evidence from a Large-Scale Hospital-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1