Effects of Hook Maneuver on Oxygen Saturation Recovery After -40 m Apnea Dive-A Randomized Crossover Trial.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.3390/sports13010024
Francisco DeAsís-Fernández, Álvaro Reina-Varona, Evangelos Papotsidakis, Juan Lafuente, José Fierro-Marrero
{"title":"Effects of Hook Maneuver on Oxygen Saturation Recovery After -40 m Apnea Dive-A Randomized Crossover Trial.","authors":"Francisco DeAsís-Fernández, Álvaro Reina-Varona, Evangelos Papotsidakis, Juan Lafuente, José Fierro-Marrero","doi":"10.3390/sports13010024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To reduce the risk of syncope, trained breath-hold divers (BHDs) use a specialized breathing technique after surfacing called \"hook breathing\" (HB). It consists of a full inspiration followed by a Valsalva-like maneuver and with subsequent exhalation performed against resistance to generate continuous positive airway pressure during exhalation. This study analyzed the influence of HB on oxygen saturation recovery after a -40 m depth apnea dive in trained BHDs. Thirteen BHDs performed two dives to -40 m at different days, one followed by HB after a dive and the other using usual breathing (UB). To detect signs of lung edema, ultrasound B-line measurements were conducted before, 10 min after the dive, and within 1 h after the dive. To detect oxygen saturation recovery, pulse oximetry was recorded before and immediately after surfacing. Both groups exhibited significant increases in SpO<sub>2</sub> over time (UB: F (2.25, 24.7) = 22.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001, ηg2 = 0.612; HB: F (2.11, 23.2) = 29.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001, ηg2 = 0.688). Significant differences in SpO<sub>2</sub> were observed between the HB and UB groups at 30-45 s post-apnea, with higher SpO<sub>2</sub> values in the HB group; between 1.64 and 5.08% of SpO<sub>2</sub> in favor of the HB intervention. Four participants showed ultrasound B-lines within ten minutes post-dive. After a 40 m apnea dive, the results revealed significant SpO<sub>2</sub> recovery from 30 s to 45 s, with the HB recovering more rapidly. No differences were found at earlier (10-25 s) or later time points (50-60 s).</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11768466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13010024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To reduce the risk of syncope, trained breath-hold divers (BHDs) use a specialized breathing technique after surfacing called "hook breathing" (HB). It consists of a full inspiration followed by a Valsalva-like maneuver and with subsequent exhalation performed against resistance to generate continuous positive airway pressure during exhalation. This study analyzed the influence of HB on oxygen saturation recovery after a -40 m depth apnea dive in trained BHDs. Thirteen BHDs performed two dives to -40 m at different days, one followed by HB after a dive and the other using usual breathing (UB). To detect signs of lung edema, ultrasound B-line measurements were conducted before, 10 min after the dive, and within 1 h after the dive. To detect oxygen saturation recovery, pulse oximetry was recorded before and immediately after surfacing. Both groups exhibited significant increases in SpO2 over time (UB: F (2.25, 24.7) = 22.1, p < 0.001, ηg2 = 0.612; HB: F (2.11, 23.2) = 29.0, p < 0.001, ηg2 = 0.688). Significant differences in SpO2 were observed between the HB and UB groups at 30-45 s post-apnea, with higher SpO2 values in the HB group; between 1.64 and 5.08% of SpO2 in favor of the HB intervention. Four participants showed ultrasound B-lines within ten minutes post-dive. After a 40 m apnea dive, the results revealed significant SpO2 recovery from 30 s to 45 s, with the HB recovering more rapidly. No differences were found at earlier (10-25 s) or later time points (50-60 s).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钩动作对-40米呼吸暂停潜水后氧饱和度恢复的影响——随机交叉试验。
为了降低晕厥的风险,训练有素的屏气潜水员(BHDs)在浮出水面后使用一种专门的呼吸技术,称为“钩式呼吸”(HB)。它包括一个完整的吸气,然后是一个类似valssalva的动作,随后呼气,在呼气过程中对抗阻力产生持续的气道正压。本研究分析了HB对训练有素的BHDs进行-40 m深度呼吸暂停潜水后氧饱和度恢复的影响。13名bhd在不同的日子进行了两次下潜至-40米,其中一名在下潜后进行HB,另一名使用常规呼吸(UB)。在潜水前、潜水后10分钟和潜水后1小时内进行b线超声测量,以检测肺水肿的迹象。为了检测氧饱和度恢复,在表面处理前后立即记录脉搏血氧饱和度。两组SpO2均随时间显著升高(UB: F (2.25, 24.7) = 22.1, p < 0.001, ηg2 = 0.612;HB: F (2.11, 23.2) = 29.0, p < 0.001,ηg2 = 0.688)。呼吸暂停后30 ~ 45 s HB组与UB组SpO2差异有统计学意义,HB组SpO2较高;1.64 - 5.08%的SpO2支持HB干预。四名参与者在潜水后十分钟内进行了超声b线检查。在40米的呼吸潜水后,结果显示SpO2在30秒到45秒之间有明显的恢复,HB恢复得更快。早期(10-25 s)和后期(50-60 s)无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of a 6-Week Intermittent Hypoxia-Hyperoxia Exposure Program on Blood Pressure, Respiratory Function, Cardiac Autonomic Nervous Activity and CRP Levels in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. The Effects of 24 Weeks Sensorimotor Training on Balance, Physical Function, and Pain in Women with Knee Osteoarthritis. Effectiveness of an mHealth Exercise Program on Fall Incidence, Fall Risk, and Fear of Falling in Nursing Home Residents: The Cluster Randomized Controlled BeSt Age Trial. An Exploratory Case Series Investigating Concurrent Aerobic and Resistance Training in Young, Highly Trained Rowers. Mapping Scientific Research on High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Overweight Populations (2011-2024).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1