[Duties of the Physician in Relation to the Use of Alternative and Complementary Medicines by Their Patients].

Rodrigo Salinas R, Carlos Echeverría B, Alberto Rojas O, Paulina Taboada R, Hernán Borja R, Anamaría Arriagada U, María A Rodríguez S, Gonzalo Ruiz-Esquide S, María Alejandra Florenzano V
{"title":"[Duties of the Physician in Relation to the Use of Alternative and Complementary Medicines by Their Patients].","authors":"Rodrigo Salinas R, Carlos Echeverría B, Alberto Rojas O, Paulina Taboada R, Hernán Borja R, Anamaría Arriagada U, María A Rodríguez S, Gonzalo Ruiz-Esquide S, María Alejandra Florenzano V","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024000800901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the prevailing medical pluralism of contemporary society, alternative and complementary medicine occupy a relevant place, comprising a heterogeneous group of practices with different values depending on tradition and social acceptance. Their scarce regulation and growing use, facilitated by promotion through social networks and distrust of the dominant biomedical model, have generated interest among medical organizations and health authorities in their use and consequences. Appreciations vary from outright rejection to interest in its adoption by public health systems as part of their services. Its growing use, however, contrasts with an incipient development of the scientific evidence supporting its use and, consequently, a scarce representation of its curricular teaching in our medical schools. The use of CAM by patients cannot be ignored in the therapeutic encounter. Physicians must be prepared to discuss their possible benefits and risks with their patients and to make recommendations in accordance with the principles of medical professionalism: the good of the patient must take precedence over other interests, taking into account the scarce scientific evidence of their efficacy and safety, the imperfect regulation to which they are subject and the lack of pharmacovigilance on their effects. The patient's autonomy over his or her health care, considerations regarding the use of scarce health care resources, and the due compassion and empathy owed to the patient as a suffering being cannot be ignored.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 8","pages":"901-908"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000800901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the prevailing medical pluralism of contemporary society, alternative and complementary medicine occupy a relevant place, comprising a heterogeneous group of practices with different values depending on tradition and social acceptance. Their scarce regulation and growing use, facilitated by promotion through social networks and distrust of the dominant biomedical model, have generated interest among medical organizations and health authorities in their use and consequences. Appreciations vary from outright rejection to interest in its adoption by public health systems as part of their services. Its growing use, however, contrasts with an incipient development of the scientific evidence supporting its use and, consequently, a scarce representation of its curricular teaching in our medical schools. The use of CAM by patients cannot be ignored in the therapeutic encounter. Physicians must be prepared to discuss their possible benefits and risks with their patients and to make recommendations in accordance with the principles of medical professionalism: the good of the patient must take precedence over other interests, taking into account the scarce scientific evidence of their efficacy and safety, the imperfect regulation to which they are subject and the lack of pharmacovigilance on their effects. The patient's autonomy over his or her health care, considerations regarding the use of scarce health care resources, and the due compassion and empathy owed to the patient as a suffering being cannot be ignored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Another Lesson from the Pandemic: Supervisor Social Support for Mental Health Protection in Healthcare Workers, Chile]. [Chronic Insomnia: A Public Health Problem]. [Coronary Angiography in Clinical Practice: Update on Indications, Complications, and Contraindications]. [Diversity and Institution: Scopes for Health Sciences Education]. [Duties of the Physician in Relation to the Use of Alternative and Complementary Medicines by Their Patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1