A mobile interactive cognitive self-assessment scale for screening cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae293
Kexin Xie, Juan Huang, Ting Chen, Dan Li, Tianxinyu Xia, Min Chu, Yue Cui, Mei Tang, Dantao Peng, Jingtong Wang, Jianling Liu, Xiaojuan Chen, Weiwei Cui, Li Liu, Yingtao Wang, Jianbing Liu, Fang Li, Liyong Wu
{"title":"A mobile interactive cognitive self-assessment scale for screening cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease","authors":"Kexin Xie, Juan Huang, Ting Chen, Dan Li, Tianxinyu Xia, Min Chu, Yue Cui, Mei Tang, Dantao Peng, Jingtong Wang, Jianling Liu, Xiaojuan Chen, Weiwei Cui, Li Liu, Yingtao Wang, Jianbing Liu, Fang Li, Liyong Wu","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background A mobile cognition scale for community screening in cognitive impairment with rigorous validation is in paucity. We aimed to develop a digital scale that overcame low education for community screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD. Methods A mobile cognitive self-assessment scale (CogSAS) was designed through the Delphi process, which is feasible for the older population with low education. In Phase 1, 518 clinically diagnosed participants were subjected to optimise the items. In Phase 2, the scale was validated in 358 participants with cognitively unimpaired and 396 participants of clinically diagnosed MCI and dementia for reliability, validity and diagnostic accuracy. In Phase 3, specificity and sensitivity were tested for biologically diagnosed participants of 38 with cognitively unimpaired and 45 with MCI and dementia due to AD according to the amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration classification system. Results The CogSAS was a three-task mobile scale testing memory and executive function. In Phase 2, the internal consistency was 0.81, and the test–retest reliability was 0.82. The construct validity was 0.74, and the criterion validity was 0.77. The sensitivity and specificity for discriminating clinically diagnosed participants with MCI and dementia from cognitively unimpaired were 0.90 and 0.67, respectively. For discriminating biologically diagnosed MCI and dementia due to AD from cognitively unimpaired, the sensitivity and specificity were 1.00 and 0.78, respectively. Conclusions The CogSAS has good reliability, validity and feasibility, showing a high sensitivity and specificity both in the community and the clinic, identifying biologically diagnosed MCI and dementia due to AD.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background A mobile cognition scale for community screening in cognitive impairment with rigorous validation is in paucity. We aimed to develop a digital scale that overcame low education for community screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD. Methods A mobile cognitive self-assessment scale (CogSAS) was designed through the Delphi process, which is feasible for the older population with low education. In Phase 1, 518 clinically diagnosed participants were subjected to optimise the items. In Phase 2, the scale was validated in 358 participants with cognitively unimpaired and 396 participants of clinically diagnosed MCI and dementia for reliability, validity and diagnostic accuracy. In Phase 3, specificity and sensitivity were tested for biologically diagnosed participants of 38 with cognitively unimpaired and 45 with MCI and dementia due to AD according to the amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration classification system. Results The CogSAS was a three-task mobile scale testing memory and executive function. In Phase 2, the internal consistency was 0.81, and the test–retest reliability was 0.82. The construct validity was 0.74, and the criterion validity was 0.77. The sensitivity and specificity for discriminating clinically diagnosed participants with MCI and dementia from cognitively unimpaired were 0.90 and 0.67, respectively. For discriminating biologically diagnosed MCI and dementia due to AD from cognitively unimpaired, the sensitivity and specificity were 1.00 and 0.78, respectively. Conclusions The CogSAS has good reliability, validity and feasibility, showing a high sensitivity and specificity both in the community and the clinic, identifying biologically diagnosed MCI and dementia due to AD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种用于筛查阿尔茨海默病所致认知障碍的移动交互式认知自我评估量表
背景目前还缺乏一种可用于社区认知障碍筛查的、经过严格验证的移动认知量表。我们的目标是开发一种数字量表,克服社区筛查阿尔茨海默病(AD)和AD引起的轻度认知障碍(MCI)的低教育水平。方法采用德尔菲法设计一套适用于低文化程度老年人的移动式认知自评量表。在第15阶段,518名临床诊断的参与者进行了优化项目。在第二阶段,该量表在358名认知功能未受损的参与者和396名临床诊断为轻度认知障碍和痴呆的参与者中进行了可靠性、有效性和诊断准确性的验证。在第三阶段,根据淀粉样蛋白、tau蛋白、神经变性分类系统,对生物学诊断的38名认知功能正常的参与者和45名因AD而患有MCI和痴呆的参与者进行了特异性和敏感性测试。结果CogSAS是一种测试记忆和执行功能的三任务移动量表。在第二阶段,内部一致性为0.81,重测信度为0.82。构念效度为0.74,标准效度为0.77。区分临床诊断为轻度认知损伤和痴呆的受试者与认知功能未受损的受试者的敏感性和特异性分别为0.90和0.67。对于区分生物学诊断的轻度认知损伤和AD所致痴呆与认知功能未受损,敏感性和特异性分别为1.00和0.78。结论CogSAS具有良好的信度、效度和可行性,在社区和临床均具有较高的敏感性和特异性,可识别生物学诊断的MCI和AD所致痴呆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Trajectories of frailty, grip strength and gait speed preceding dementia: a nested case-control study. Antidepressants and risk of pneumonia in older adults: a nationwide self-controlled case series. Permanent cognitive or physical impairment after transfer from long-term care to acute care: a retrospective cohort study. Embedding effective dementia education into undergraduate medical curricula-a realist review. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions on delirium duration in older adults with delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1