Comparative analysis of proton depth dose distribution in the Snyder head phantom: FLUKA vs GEANT4 physics models

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Radiation Physics and Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112532
Mustafa Mohammad Rafiei , Alessandro Bartoloni , Sara Parsaei , Lidia Strigari
{"title":"Comparative analysis of proton depth dose distribution in the Snyder head phantom: FLUKA vs GEANT4 physics models","authors":"Mustafa Mohammad Rafiei ,&nbsp;Alessandro Bartoloni ,&nbsp;Sara Parsaei ,&nbsp;Lidia Strigari","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Today, estimating ionizing radiation doses through simulations using Monte Carlo codes is essential in many fields, particularly space radiobiology. Simulations are engaging because they are risk-free and significantly more cost-effective than experimental methods. Consequently, various codes have been developed to transport a broad spectrum of charged and uncharged particles across an extensive energy range from several keV to hundreds of TeV and beyond. These codes have diverse physical models, enabling users to select the most appropriate one for their simulations. Assessing the differences between these models is crucial for accurately estimating radiation doses. In this study, three different physical models from GEANT4 11.1.3 (FTFP_BERT, FTFP_INCLXX, and FTF_BIC) and the physical model of FLUKA 4–4.0 were evaluated to determine the depth dose distribution of protons (0.1 GeV–10 GeV) within the Snyder head phantom. The findings reveal that varying physical models yield different dose values. The paper thoroughly investigates the relative differences in the results obtained from FLUKA and GEANT4, expressed as percentages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 112532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25000246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, estimating ionizing radiation doses through simulations using Monte Carlo codes is essential in many fields, particularly space radiobiology. Simulations are engaging because they are risk-free and significantly more cost-effective than experimental methods. Consequently, various codes have been developed to transport a broad spectrum of charged and uncharged particles across an extensive energy range from several keV to hundreds of TeV and beyond. These codes have diverse physical models, enabling users to select the most appropriate one for their simulations. Assessing the differences between these models is crucial for accurately estimating radiation doses. In this study, three different physical models from GEANT4 11.1.3 (FTFP_BERT, FTFP_INCLXX, and FTF_BIC) and the physical model of FLUKA 4–4.0 were evaluated to determine the depth dose distribution of protons (0.1 GeV–10 GeV) within the Snyder head phantom. The findings reveal that varying physical models yield different dose values. The paper thoroughly investigates the relative differences in the results obtained from FLUKA and GEANT4, expressed as percentages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质子深度剂量分布在Snyder头部幻影中的比较分析:FLUKA与GEANT4物理模型
今天,利用蒙特卡罗代码通过模拟估算电离辐射剂量在许多领域,特别是空间放射生物学中是必不可少的。模拟之所以吸引人,是因为它们没有风险,而且比实验方法更具成本效益。因此,已经开发了各种代码,以在从几个keV到数百TeV甚至更高的能量范围内传输广泛的带电和不带电粒子谱。这些代码有不同的物理模型,使用户能够选择最合适的一个为他们的模拟。评估这些模型之间的差异对于准确估计辐射剂量至关重要。本研究采用GEANT4 11.1.3中的三种不同物理模型(FTFP_BERT、FTFP_INCLXX和FTF_BIC)和FLUKA 4-4.0的物理模型进行评估,以确定质子(0.1 GeV - 10 GeV)在Snyder头影内的深度剂量分布。研究结果表明,不同的物理模型产生不同的剂量值。本文深入研究了FLUKA和GEANT4所得结果的相对差异,以百分比表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
期刊最新文献
On the precision and accuracy of Audi-Wapstra-Wang Extrapolations for nuclear mass predictions Scintillation properties of organic–inorganic lead chloride perovskite crystals having cycloalkane or benzene derivatives Dual-crosslinked PVA-based hydrogel electrolyte with high toughness prepared by electron beam irradiation for aqueous Zn-ion supercapacitors Influence of BaO on the physical, optical, and radiation-shielding properties of B2O3–CaO–MgO–ZnO–La2O3 glasses for gamma and neutron protection applications Ionizing radiation responses in graphene field effect transistor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1