A proposed screening strategy for evaluating the genotoxicity potential of botanicals and botanical extracts

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food and Chemical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2025.115277
Kristine L. Witt , Jan van Benthem , Tetyana Kobets , Guosheng Chen , Olaf Kelber , Julie Krzykwa , James T. MacGregor , Nan Mei , Constance A. Mitchell , Ivonne Rietjens , Zehra Sarigol-Kilic , Stephanie L. Smith-Roe , Helga Stopper , Yax Thakkar , Errol Zeiger , Stefan Pfuhler
{"title":"A proposed screening strategy for evaluating the genotoxicity potential of botanicals and botanical extracts","authors":"Kristine L. Witt ,&nbsp;Jan van Benthem ,&nbsp;Tetyana Kobets ,&nbsp;Guosheng Chen ,&nbsp;Olaf Kelber ,&nbsp;Julie Krzykwa ,&nbsp;James T. MacGregor ,&nbsp;Nan Mei ,&nbsp;Constance A. Mitchell ,&nbsp;Ivonne Rietjens ,&nbsp;Zehra Sarigol-Kilic ,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Smith-Roe ,&nbsp;Helga Stopper ,&nbsp;Yax Thakkar ,&nbsp;Errol Zeiger ,&nbsp;Stefan Pfuhler","doi":"10.1016/j.fct.2025.115277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Botanicals have long been used to promote health and treat diseases, but the safety of many currently marketed botanicals has not been adequately evaluated. Given the chemical complexity of botanicals, which often contain numerous unknown constituents, and their widespread use, comprehensive toxicity assessments are needed. The Botanical Safety Consortium was established to address this challenge. This international group of experts in toxicology, chemistry, bioinformatics, and pharmacognosy is developing a toolkit of assays to generate reliable toxicological profiles for botanicals. Genotoxicity assessment is especially critical, because, unlike other toxicities, genotoxicity is not adequately identified by adverse event and history-of-use reports, and genotoxicity is directly linked to health consequences such as cancer and birth defects. The Consortium's Genotoxicity Technical Working Group is exploring a genotoxicity testing strategy based on the use of <em>in silico</em> modeling and the bacterial reverse mutation and <em>in vitro</em> micronucleus assays and including several options for additional tests to further characterize genotoxicity and mode of action when indicated. The effectiveness of this testing strategy is being evaluated using 13 well-characterized botanicals with existing toxicological data as case studies. A brief overview of each of these 13 botanicals is provided. The final strategy for developing comprehensive genotoxicity profiles of botanicals will incorporate published genotoxicity data, chemical composition information, <em>in silico</em> and <em>in vitro</em> test data, and human exposure data, reducing the need for animal testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":317,"journal":{"name":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 115277"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691525000444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Botanicals have long been used to promote health and treat diseases, but the safety of many currently marketed botanicals has not been adequately evaluated. Given the chemical complexity of botanicals, which often contain numerous unknown constituents, and their widespread use, comprehensive toxicity assessments are needed. The Botanical Safety Consortium was established to address this challenge. This international group of experts in toxicology, chemistry, bioinformatics, and pharmacognosy is developing a toolkit of assays to generate reliable toxicological profiles for botanicals. Genotoxicity assessment is especially critical, because, unlike other toxicities, genotoxicity is not adequately identified by adverse event and history-of-use reports, and genotoxicity is directly linked to health consequences such as cancer and birth defects. The Consortium's Genotoxicity Technical Working Group is exploring a genotoxicity testing strategy based on the use of in silico modeling and the bacterial reverse mutation and in vitro micronucleus assays and including several options for additional tests to further characterize genotoxicity and mode of action when indicated. The effectiveness of this testing strategy is being evaluated using 13 well-characterized botanicals with existing toxicological data as case studies. A brief overview of each of these 13 botanicals is provided. The final strategy for developing comprehensive genotoxicity profiles of botanicals will incorporate published genotoxicity data, chemical composition information, in silico and in vitro test data, and human exposure data, reducing the need for animal testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种评估植物药物和植物提取物遗传毒性潜力的筛选策略。
长期以来,植物药一直被用于促进健康和治疗疾病,但许多目前上市的植物药的安全性尚未得到充分评估。鉴于植物药的化学复杂性,它们通常含有许多未知成分,以及它们的广泛使用,需要进行全面的毒性评估。植物安全联盟的成立就是为了应对这一挑战。这个由毒理学、化学、生物信息学和生药学专家组成的国际小组正在开发一套测定方法,以生成可靠的植物药物毒理学概况。遗传毒性评估尤其重要,因为与其他毒性不同,遗传毒性不能通过不良事件和使用史报告充分确定,而且遗传毒性与癌症和出生缺陷等健康后果直接相关。该联盟的遗传毒性技术工作组正在探索一种基于计算机模拟、细菌反向突变和体外微核测定的遗传毒性检测战略,并包括若干附加检测方案,以便在有指示时进一步确定遗传毒性和作用方式。目前正在利用13种特征明确的植物药物和现有毒理学数据作为案例研究,评估这一检测策略的有效性。提供了这13种植物药的简要概述。制定植物药物综合遗传毒性概况的最终战略将包括已公布的遗传毒性数据、化学成分信息、计算机和体外试验数据以及人体接触数据,从而减少对动物试验的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Food and Chemical Toxicology 工程技术-毒理学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
4.70%
发文量
651
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), an internationally renowned journal, that publishes original research articles and reviews on toxic effects, in animals and humans, of natural or synthetic chemicals occurring in the human environment with particular emphasis on food, drugs, and chemicals, including agricultural and industrial safety, and consumer product safety. Areas such as safety evaluation of novel foods and ingredients, biotechnologically-derived products, and nanomaterials are included in the scope of the journal. FCT also encourages submission of papers on inter-relationships between nutrition and toxicology and on in vitro techniques, particularly those fostering the 3 Rs. The principal aim of the journal is to publish high impact, scholarly work and to serve as a multidisciplinary forum for research in toxicology. Papers submitted will be judged on the basis of scientific originality and contribution to the field, quality and subject matter. Studies should address at least one of the following: -Adverse physiological/biochemical, or pathological changes induced by specific defined substances -New techniques for assessing potential toxicity, including molecular biology -Mechanisms underlying toxic phenomena -Toxicological examinations of specific chemicals or consumer products, both those showing adverse effects and those demonstrating safety, that meet current standards of scientific acceptability. Authors must clearly and briefly identify what novel toxic effect (s) or toxic mechanism (s) of the chemical are being reported and what their significance is in the abstract. Furthermore, sufficient doses should be included in order to provide information on NOAEL/LOAEL values.
期刊最新文献
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, eicosane, CAS Registry Number 112-95-8. RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, octadecane, CAS Registry Number 593-45-3. RIPK3/MLKL-Mediated Necroptosis Promotes Hepatic Inflammation in Chronic Arsenic Exposure through Drinking Water. RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-methyl-8-methylenetricyclo[3.3.1.(3,7)]decan-2-yl acetate, CAS Registry Number 122760-85-4. RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessments, ethyl ricinoleate, CAS Registry Number 55066-53-0.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1