Analysis of trends and allergenicity risk assessments in novel food approvals within the European Union between 2018 and 2023

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food and Chemical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2025.115249
Sim Ray Yue , Kitty C.M. Verhoeckx , Geert F. Houben , Katrine Lindholm Bøgh
{"title":"Analysis of trends and allergenicity risk assessments in novel food approvals within the European Union between 2018 and 2023","authors":"Sim Ray Yue ,&nbsp;Kitty C.M. Verhoeckx ,&nbsp;Geert F. Houben ,&nbsp;Katrine Lindholm Bøgh","doi":"10.1016/j.fct.2025.115249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Novel food (NF) approvals in the European Union between 2018 and 2023 (n = 117) were retrieved and analysed. They consist of new NF (52.1%), modification (38.5%), and traditional food (9.4%). The average time taken for new NF applications to be approved was 38 months in 2023, with clock-stops occurring in all approvals since 2020. For new NFs, only 21.3% and 9.8% performed tests by bioinformatics homology and immunological analyses respectively, suggesting that allergenicity assessments remain a challenge. Allergenicity risks were regarded as possible for 47.5% of the new NF approvals, while 52.5% were expected to be low, very low, or unlikely. However, it was not always clear what the decision was based on. While protein intake levels were rarely mentioned in the allergenicity conclusions of approvals, new NFs with allergenicity risks typically had protein intake exceeding 1 mg/day. Establishing a dose that represents a Threshold of Allergological Concern below which a protein is unlikely to cause sensitisation in consumers, could make <em>de novo</em> allergenicity assessment of NFs more feasible. This approach might exempt certain proteins from testing, instead focusing on proteins of possible allergenic relevance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":317,"journal":{"name":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 115249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691525000158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Novel food (NF) approvals in the European Union between 2018 and 2023 (n = 117) were retrieved and analysed. They consist of new NF (52.1%), modification (38.5%), and traditional food (9.4%). The average time taken for new NF applications to be approved was 38 months in 2023, with clock-stops occurring in all approvals since 2020. For new NFs, only 21.3% and 9.8% performed tests by bioinformatics homology and immunological analyses respectively, suggesting that allergenicity assessments remain a challenge. Allergenicity risks were regarded as possible for 47.5% of the new NF approvals, while 52.5% were expected to be low, very low, or unlikely. However, it was not always clear what the decision was based on. While protein intake levels were rarely mentioned in the allergenicity conclusions of approvals, new NFs with allergenicity risks typically had protein intake exceeding 1 mg/day. Establishing a dose that represents a Threshold of Allergological Concern below which a protein is unlikely to cause sensitisation in consumers, could make de novo allergenicity assessment of NFs more feasible. This approach might exempt certain proteins from testing, instead focusing on proteins of possible allergenic relevance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2018年至2023年欧盟新食品批准趋势分析和致敏性风险评估
检索并分析了2018年至2023年欧盟批准的新型食品(NF) (n = 117)。它们包括新NF食品(52.1%)、改良食品(38.5%)和传统食品(9.4%)。2023年,新核反应堆申请获得批准的平均时间为38个月,自2020年以来,所有批准都出现了“时钟停止”。对于新的NFs,分别只有21.3%和9.8%的人进行了生物信息学同源性和免疫学分析测试,这表明过敏原评估仍然是一个挑战。47.5%的新批准的NF被认为可能存在致敏性风险,而52.5%的预期为低、极低或不太可能。然而,人们并不总是清楚这一决定的依据。虽然在批准的致敏性结论中很少提及蛋白质摄入量水平,但具有致敏性风险的新NFs通常蛋白质摄入量超过1mg /天。建立一个代表过敏学关注阈值的剂量,低于该阈值的蛋白质不太可能引起消费者的致敏,可以使NFs的从头致敏性评估更加可行。这种方法可以免除某些蛋白质的测试,而不是专注于可能与过敏原相关的蛋白质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Food and Chemical Toxicology 工程技术-毒理学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
4.70%
发文量
651
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), an internationally renowned journal, that publishes original research articles and reviews on toxic effects, in animals and humans, of natural or synthetic chemicals occurring in the human environment with particular emphasis on food, drugs, and chemicals, including agricultural and industrial safety, and consumer product safety. Areas such as safety evaluation of novel foods and ingredients, biotechnologically-derived products, and nanomaterials are included in the scope of the journal. FCT also encourages submission of papers on inter-relationships between nutrition and toxicology and on in vitro techniques, particularly those fostering the 3 Rs. The principal aim of the journal is to publish high impact, scholarly work and to serve as a multidisciplinary forum for research in toxicology. Papers submitted will be judged on the basis of scientific originality and contribution to the field, quality and subject matter. Studies should address at least one of the following: -Adverse physiological/biochemical, or pathological changes induced by specific defined substances -New techniques for assessing potential toxicity, including molecular biology -Mechanisms underlying toxic phenomena -Toxicological examinations of specific chemicals or consumer products, both those showing adverse effects and those demonstrating safety, that meet current standards of scientific acceptability. Authors must clearly and briefly identify what novel toxic effect (s) or toxic mechanism (s) of the chemical are being reported and what their significance is in the abstract. Furthermore, sufficient doses should be included in order to provide information on NOAEL/LOAEL values.
期刊最新文献
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-methyl-8-methylenetricyclo[3.3.1.(3,7)]decan-2-yl acetate, CAS Registry Number 122760-85-4 RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessments, ethyl ricinoleate, CAS Registry Number 55066-53-0 RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, eicosane, CAS Registry Number 112-95-8 RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, octadecane, CAS Registry Number 593-45-3 RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, nonadecane, CAS Registry Number 629-92-5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1