Comparison of Vessel Responses Following Combined Sirolimus-Eluting and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Stent and Ultra-Thin Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation by Serial Optical Coherence Tomography and Coronary Angioscopy: A Multicenter Observational Study

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.009
Daisuke Nakamura MD , Isamu Mizote MD, PhD , Takayuki Ishihara MD , Yutaka Matsuhiro MD , Shota Okuno MD, PhD , Tatsuya Shiraki MD , Takuya Tsujimura MD , Naotaka Okamoto MD , Naoki Itaya MD , Takaharu Nakayoshi MD , Atsushi Kikuchi MD , Tsutomu Kawai MD , Yuhei Nojima MD, PhD , Mitsuyoshi Takahara MD, PhD , Takashi Morita MD, PhD , Shungo Hikosou MD, PhD , Daisaku Nakatani MD, PhD , Toshiaki Mano MD, PhD , Takahisa Yamada MD, PhD , Takahumi Ueno MD, PhD , Yasushi Sakata MD, PhD
{"title":"Comparison of Vessel Responses Following Combined Sirolimus-Eluting and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Stent and Ultra-Thin Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation by Serial Optical Coherence Tomography and Coronary Angioscopy: A Multicenter Observational Study","authors":"Daisuke Nakamura MD ,&nbsp;Isamu Mizote MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takayuki Ishihara MD ,&nbsp;Yutaka Matsuhiro MD ,&nbsp;Shota Okuno MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tatsuya Shiraki MD ,&nbsp;Takuya Tsujimura MD ,&nbsp;Naotaka Okamoto MD ,&nbsp;Naoki Itaya MD ,&nbsp;Takaharu Nakayoshi MD ,&nbsp;Atsushi Kikuchi MD ,&nbsp;Tsutomu Kawai MD ,&nbsp;Yuhei Nojima MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mitsuyoshi Takahara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takashi Morita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shungo Hikosou MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Daisaku Nakatani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Toshiaki Mano MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takahisa Yamada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takahumi Ueno MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yasushi Sakata MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34+ antibody–coated Combo Stent (DTS) has been developed to enhance endothelization and capture endothelial progenitor cells; however, vessel responses following DTS implantation remain unclear. Therefore, we evaluated early- and mid-term intravascular characteristics of DTS using intravascular imaging modalities. This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled 88 patients (95 lesions) who underwent DTS (43 patients, 48 lesions) or sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (SES, 45 patients, 47 lesions) implantation. Serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS) findings were compared between the groups at 1 and 12 months.The OCT findings were similar between the DTS and SES groups at 1 month, including the covered strut rate (84.21 ± 9.50% versus 80.56 ± 17.68%, p = 0.27). CAS findings were also comparable despite a more severe yellow coloration observed in the DTS group (p = 0.006). At 12 months, OCT findings revealed that the covered and adequate strut coverage (≥40 μm) rates were significantly higher (99.27 ± 0.95% versus 95.46 ± 5.56%, p &lt;0.001 and 88.90 ± 10.15% versus 72.96 ± 16.48%, p &lt;0.001) and neointimal thickness was significantly thicker (152.16 ± 70.31 versus 84.39 ± 29.80 μm, p &lt;0.001) in DTS than in SES. The malapposed strut rate was significantly higher in SES than in DTS (0.04 ± 0.18% versus 0.82 ± 1.87%, p = 0.018). CAS revealed that the yellow coloration (p = 0.049) and subclinical intrastent thrombus (p = 0.019) were less severe in DTS than in SES at 12 months. In conclusion, DTS provided better advantages regarding strut coverage and plaque stabilization compared to SES. However, given the observational nature of this study, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291492500030X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34+ antibody–coated Combo Stent (DTS) has been developed to enhance endothelization and capture endothelial progenitor cells; however, vessel responses following DTS implantation remain unclear. Therefore, we evaluated early- and mid-term intravascular characteristics of DTS using intravascular imaging modalities. This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled 88 patients (95 lesions) who underwent DTS (43 patients, 48 lesions) or sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (SES, 45 patients, 47 lesions) implantation. Serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS) findings were compared between the groups at 1 and 12 months.The OCT findings were similar between the DTS and SES groups at 1 month, including the covered strut rate (84.21 ± 9.50% versus 80.56 ± 17.68%, p = 0.27). CAS findings were also comparable despite a more severe yellow coloration observed in the DTS group (p = 0.006). At 12 months, OCT findings revealed that the covered and adequate strut coverage (≥40 μm) rates were significantly higher (99.27 ± 0.95% versus 95.46 ± 5.56%, p <0.001 and 88.90 ± 10.15% versus 72.96 ± 16.48%, p <0.001) and neointimal thickness was significantly thicker (152.16 ± 70.31 versus 84.39 ± 29.80 μm, p <0.001) in DTS than in SES. The malapposed strut rate was significantly higher in SES than in DTS (0.04 ± 0.18% versus 0.82 ± 1.87%, p = 0.018). CAS revealed that the yellow coloration (p = 0.049) and subclinical intrastent thrombus (p = 0.019) were less severe in DTS than in SES at 12 months. In conclusion, DTS provided better advantages regarding strut coverage and plaque stabilization compared to SES. However, given the observational nature of this study, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过连续光学相干断层扫描和冠状动脉血管造影比较联合西罗莫司洗脱和内皮祖细胞支架与超薄西罗莫司洗脱支架植入后的血管反应:一项多中心观察研究。
一种双重治疗的西罗莫司洗脱和CD34+抗体包被复合支架(DTS)已经开发出来,以增强内皮和捕获内皮祖细胞;然而,DTS植入后的血管反应尚不清楚。因此,我们使用血管内成像方式评估DTS的早期和中期血管内特征。这项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究纳入了88例患者(95个病变),他们接受了DTS(43例,48个病变)或西罗莫司洗脱Orsiro支架(45例,47个病变)植入术。比较两组患者1个月和12个月的连续光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和冠状动脉造影(CAS)结果。DTS组和SES组在1个月的OCT表现相似,包括覆盖的支撑率(84.21±9.50% vs 80.56±17.68%,P=0.27)。尽管DTS组观察到更严重的黄色,但CAS的结果也具有可比性(P=0.006)。12个月时,OCT结果显示覆盖和足够的支架覆盖率(≥40 μm)率显著高于对照组(99.27±0.95% vs 95.46±5.56%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Is FFR Better Than iFR for Left Main Assessment? Risk Reduction by IMPELLA Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease: In Pursuit of Excellence. The OPTIVUS-Complex PCI Study: Striving for Left Main Perfection. Procedural Complexity and Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1