Effectiveness and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy After Short-Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in PCI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.014
Giulia Alagna, Giancarlo Trimarchi, Alessia Cascone, Alessio Villari, Giulia Cavolina, Francesca Campanella, Antonino Micari, Giovanni Taverna, Giuseppe Andò
{"title":"Effectiveness and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy After Short-Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in PCI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Giulia Alagna,&nbsp;Giancarlo Trimarchi,&nbsp;Alessia Cascone,&nbsp;Alessio Villari,&nbsp;Giulia Cavolina,&nbsp;Francesca Campanella,&nbsp;Antonino Micari,&nbsp;Giovanni Taverna,&nbsp;Giuseppe Andò","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, is the standard treatment for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, the optimal duration of DAPT remains debated due to the need to balance ischemic event reduction with bleeding risks. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy after short-duration DAPT (1 to 3 months) compared to extended DAPT, focusing on major bleeding and cardiovascular outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ticagrelor monotherapy after short-duration DAPT to extended DAPT were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data on major bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and mortality were analyzed, and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Five RCTs involving 32,393 patients were included. Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced MACCE (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and major bleeding (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.77; p = 0.0008) compared to extended DAPT. It also significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and cardiovascular death (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.94; p = 0.02). The incidence of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke were similar between the groups. Net adverse clinical events (NACE) were 27% lower with ticagrelor monotherapy (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.85; p &lt;0.0001). In conclusion, ticagrelor monotherapy after short-duration DAPT reduces major bleeding complications without compromising cardiovascular protection. This approach offers a promising strategy to optimize outcomes for PCI patients, particularly those at high bleeding risk. Further studies are needed to refine the optimal DAPT duration in various patient populations, especially those with higher ischemic risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925000414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, is the standard treatment for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, the optimal duration of DAPT remains debated due to the need to balance ischemic event reduction with bleeding risks. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy after short-duration DAPT (1 to 3 months) compared to extended DAPT, focusing on major bleeding and cardiovascular outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ticagrelor monotherapy after short-duration DAPT to extended DAPT were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data on major bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and mortality were analyzed, and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Five RCTs involving 32,393 patients were included. Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced MACCE (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and major bleeding (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.77; p = 0.0008) compared to extended DAPT. It also significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and cardiovascular death (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.94; p = 0.02). The incidence of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke were similar between the groups. Net adverse clinical events (NACE) were 27% lower with ticagrelor monotherapy (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.85; p <0.0001). In conclusion, ticagrelor monotherapy after short-duration DAPT reduces major bleeding complications without compromising cardiovascular protection. This approach offers a promising strategy to optimize outcomes for PCI patients, particularly those at high bleeding risk. Further studies are needed to refine the optimal DAPT duration in various patient populations, especially those with higher ischemic risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PCI 患者短期双联抗血小板疗法后替卡格雷单药治疗的有效性和安全性:系统综述与元分析》。
双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)由阿司匹林和P2Y12抑制剂组成,是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)药物洗脱支架(DES)患者的标准治疗方法。然而,由于需要平衡缺血性事件减少和出血风险,DAPT的最佳持续时间仍存在争议。本研究评估了短时间DAPT(1-3个月)后替格瑞洛单药治疗与延长DAPT的疗效和安全性,重点关注大出血和心血管结局。按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。从PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中确定了比较替格瑞洛单药治疗短期DAPT与延长DAPT的随机对照试验(rct)。分析大出血、主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)、心肌梗死、卒中、支架血栓形成和死亡率的数据,并使用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)。纳入5项随机对照试验,涉及32393例患者。替格瑞洛单药治疗显著降低MACCE (RR: 0.88;95% ci: 0.77-0.99;p=0.04)和大出血(RR: 0.53;95% ci: 0.37-0.77;p=0.0008)。它还显著降低了全因死亡率(RR: 0.82;95% ci: 0.67-0.99;p=0.04)和心血管死亡(RR: 0.68;95% ci: 0.49-0.94;p = 0.02)。两组间心肌梗死、支架内血栓形成和脑卒中发生率相似。替格瑞洛单药组净不良临床事件(NACE)降低27% (RR: 0.73;95% ci: 0.63-0.85;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Procedural Complexity and Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. PRIMARY PERICARDIAL MESOTHELIOMA: A RARE AND AGGRESSIVE MALIGNANCY - CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW. Selective Use of Thromboaspiration in STEMI: CMR Evidence Against Routine Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1