A global review on perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in the riverine systems: Environmental behaviours and risks implications

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178596
Muhammad Younas , Kifayatullah Khan , Maria Zeb , Muhammad Yaseen , Noor Samad Shah , Hassan Alshemmari , Yasar N. Kavil , Saeed Saad Alelyani , Mohamed Hussien , Sidra Zeb , Di Du
{"title":"A global review on perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in the riverine systems: Environmental behaviours and risks implications","authors":"Muhammad Younas ,&nbsp;Kifayatullah Khan ,&nbsp;Maria Zeb ,&nbsp;Muhammad Yaseen ,&nbsp;Noor Samad Shah ,&nbsp;Hassan Alshemmari ,&nbsp;Yasar N. Kavil ,&nbsp;Saeed Saad Alelyani ,&nbsp;Mohamed Hussien ,&nbsp;Sidra Zeb ,&nbsp;Di Du","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review provides a comprehensive global overview of the occurrences, distribution, emissions, and associated risks of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in riverine systems across both developed and developing countries including the United States (US), Spain, France, Netherlands, Germany, Pakistan, China, Korea, Vietnam, Italy, and Japan. Data for this review were systematically gathered through a comprehensive and structured search process using various databases, search engines, and academic repositories to identify relevant literature and studies. Human health risks were assessed using recommended United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) models, including estimated daily intake (EDI), hazard risk (HR), and hazard index (HI) for each reported PFAA compound in the studied countries. The overall results revealed significant variability in PFAAs contamination from the 1950s to 2023, reflecting extensive industrial usage and increasing environmental concerns, with levels often exceeding the permissible limits set by environmental quality standards established by national or international regulatory authorities, agencies, and organizations. Among the studied countries, Italy exhibited the highest average sum of PFAA compounds (∑PFAAs) concentration in riverine water, ranging from 4.07 to 140.61 ng/L, with an average of 41.37 ng/L, followed by the Netherlands, China, Japan, the US, Pakistan, Spain, France, Germany, Korea, and Vietnam. Similarly, Germany showed the highest average ∑PFAAs concentration in riverine sediments, ranging from 40.25 to 213.00 ng/g, with an average of 126.63 ng/g, followed by China, Spain, the US, Pakistan, Vietnam, and Korea. Whereas, in riverine fish, Spain had the highest average ∑PFAAs concentration, ranging from 0.05 to 144.97 ng/g, with a mean of 15.94 ng/g, followed by Korea, Vietnam, and the US. From a human risk perspective, the highest average EDI of ∑PFAAs via riverine water consumption was observed in the dependent population of Italy (2.02 × 10<sup>−3</sup> ng/L/day), followed by the Netherlands (8.24 × 10<sup>−4</sup> ng/L/day), the US (5.56 × 10<sup>−4</sup> ng/L/day), Pakistan (3.99 × 10<sup>−4</sup> ng/L/day), Japan (3.69 × 10<sup>−4</sup> ng/L/day), France (3.42 × 10<sup>−4</sup> ng/L/day), China (2.58 × 10<sup>−4</sup> ng/L/day), Spain (2.43 × 10<sup>−4</sup> ng/L/day), Germany (1.17 × 10<sup>−4</sup> ng/L/day), Korea (6.01 × 10<sup>−5</sup> ng/L/day), and Vietnam (1.28 × 10<sup>−5</sup> ng/L/day). For fish consumption, Spain recorded the highest average EDI of ∑PFAAs (9.92 × 10<sup>0</sup> ng/g/day) in its dependent population, followed by the US (3.44 × 10<sup>0</sup> ng/g/day), Korea (8.13 × 10<sup>−1</sup> ng/g/day), and Vietnam (4.99 × 10<sup>−1</sup> ng/g/day). The non-carcinogenic HR values for individual PFAA compounds via riverine water intake in the dependent populations of both developed and developing countries were within acceptable limits (&lt;1). However, the HI values for ∑PFAAs intake via riverine fish consumption in the dependent population exceeded the threshold (&gt;1) in the developed countries, the US and Spain, indicating higher potential risks associated with fish consumption in these countries. Given the inadequate wastewater treatment facilities in many regions, coupled with untreated runoff from urban areas and agricultural fields draining directly into rivers, this study underscores the urgent need for integrated prevention and control measures to mitigate PFAAs contamination in riverine systems and reduce associated risks. Ultimately, stricter regulations, improved monitoring, and enhanced water treatment technologies are crucial to reducing PFAAs contamination and safeguarding public health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"964 ","pages":"Article 178596"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972500230X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive global overview of the occurrences, distribution, emissions, and associated risks of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in riverine systems across both developed and developing countries including the United States (US), Spain, France, Netherlands, Germany, Pakistan, China, Korea, Vietnam, Italy, and Japan. Data for this review were systematically gathered through a comprehensive and structured search process using various databases, search engines, and academic repositories to identify relevant literature and studies. Human health risks were assessed using recommended United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) models, including estimated daily intake (EDI), hazard risk (HR), and hazard index (HI) for each reported PFAA compound in the studied countries. The overall results revealed significant variability in PFAAs contamination from the 1950s to 2023, reflecting extensive industrial usage and increasing environmental concerns, with levels often exceeding the permissible limits set by environmental quality standards established by national or international regulatory authorities, agencies, and organizations. Among the studied countries, Italy exhibited the highest average sum of PFAA compounds (∑PFAAs) concentration in riverine water, ranging from 4.07 to 140.61 ng/L, with an average of 41.37 ng/L, followed by the Netherlands, China, Japan, the US, Pakistan, Spain, France, Germany, Korea, and Vietnam. Similarly, Germany showed the highest average ∑PFAAs concentration in riverine sediments, ranging from 40.25 to 213.00 ng/g, with an average of 126.63 ng/g, followed by China, Spain, the US, Pakistan, Vietnam, and Korea. Whereas, in riverine fish, Spain had the highest average ∑PFAAs concentration, ranging from 0.05 to 144.97 ng/g, with a mean of 15.94 ng/g, followed by Korea, Vietnam, and the US. From a human risk perspective, the highest average EDI of ∑PFAAs via riverine water consumption was observed in the dependent population of Italy (2.02 × 10−3 ng/L/day), followed by the Netherlands (8.24 × 10−4 ng/L/day), the US (5.56 × 10−4 ng/L/day), Pakistan (3.99 × 10−4 ng/L/day), Japan (3.69 × 10−4 ng/L/day), France (3.42 × 10−4 ng/L/day), China (2.58 × 10−4 ng/L/day), Spain (2.43 × 10−4 ng/L/day), Germany (1.17 × 10−4 ng/L/day), Korea (6.01 × 10−5 ng/L/day), and Vietnam (1.28 × 10−5 ng/L/day). For fish consumption, Spain recorded the highest average EDI of ∑PFAAs (9.92 × 100 ng/g/day) in its dependent population, followed by the US (3.44 × 100 ng/g/day), Korea (8.13 × 10−1 ng/g/day), and Vietnam (4.99 × 10−1 ng/g/day). The non-carcinogenic HR values for individual PFAA compounds via riverine water intake in the dependent populations of both developed and developing countries were within acceptable limits (<1). However, the HI values for ∑PFAAs intake via riverine fish consumption in the dependent population exceeded the threshold (>1) in the developed countries, the US and Spain, indicating higher potential risks associated with fish consumption in these countries. Given the inadequate wastewater treatment facilities in many regions, coupled with untreated runoff from urban areas and agricultural fields draining directly into rivers, this study underscores the urgent need for integrated prevention and control measures to mitigate PFAAs contamination in riverine systems and reduce associated risks. Ultimately, stricter regulations, improved monitoring, and enhanced water treatment technologies are crucial to reducing PFAAs contamination and safeguarding public health.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
河流系统中的全氟烷基酸 (PFAAs) 全球综述:环境行为和风险影响。
本综述对包括美国、西班牙、法国、荷兰、德国、巴基斯坦、中国、韩国、越南、意大利和日本在内的发达国家和发展中国家河流系统中全氟烷基酸(PFAAs)的发生、分布、排放和相关风险进行了全面的全球概述。本综述的数据是通过使用各种数据库、搜索引擎和学术知识库进行全面和结构化的搜索过程系统地收集的,以确定相关的文献和研究。使用美国环境保护署(USEPA)推荐的模型评估人类健康风险,包括在所研究国家中每种报告的PFAA化合物的估计每日摄入量(EDI)、危害风险(HR)和危害指数(HI)。总体结果显示,从20世纪50年代到2023年,PFAAs污染的显著变化,反映了广泛的工业使用和日益增长的环境问题,其水平经常超过国家或国际监管机构、机构和组织制定的环境质量标准所允许的限制。意大利的PFAA化合物(∑PFAAs)浓度平均值最高,为4.07 ~ 140.61 ng/L,平均值为41.37 ng/L,其次为荷兰、中国、日本、美国、巴基斯坦、西班牙、法国、德国、韩国和越南。河流沉积物∑PFAAs平均浓度德国最高,为40.25 ~ 213.00 ng/g,平均值为126.63 ng/g,其次为中国、西班牙、美国、巴基斯坦、越南和韩国。西班牙的平均∑PFAAs浓度最高,为0.05 ~ 144.97 ng/g,平均值为15.94 ng/g,其次是韩国、越南和美国。从人类风险角度看,意大利依赖人群的∑PFAAs平均EDI最高(2.02 × 10-3 ng/L/day),其次是荷兰(8.24 × 10-4 ng/L/day)、美国(5.56 × 10-4 ng/L/day)、巴基斯坦(3.99 × 10-4 ng/L/day)、日本(3.69 × 10-4 ng/L/day)、法国(3.42 × 10-4 ng/L/day)、中国(2.58 × 10-4 ng/L/day)、西班牙(2.43 × 10-4 ng/L/day)、德国(1.17 × 10-4 ng/L/day)、韩国(6.01 × 10-5 ng/L/day)。越南(1.28 × 10-5 ng/L/day)。在鱼类消费方面,西班牙的平均EDI最高,为9.92 × 100 ng/g/day,其次是美国(3.44 × 100 ng/g/day)、韩国(8.13 × 10-1 ng/g/day)和越南(4.99 × 10-1 ng/g/day)。在发达国家、美国和西班牙,发达国家和发展中国家的依赖人群中,通过河水摄入的单个PFAA化合物的非致癌性HR值都在可接受的范围内(1),这表明在这些国家,食用鱼类具有更高的潜在风险。鉴于许多地区的污水处理设施不足,加上未经处理的城市地区和农田径流直接排入河流,本研究强调迫切需要采取综合防治措施,以减轻河流系统中的PFAAs污染并降低相关风险。最终,更严格的法规、改进的监测和改进的水处理技术对于减少PFAAs污染和保障公众健康至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances in sediments and wastewater treatment plant-derived biosolids from Ireland" [Science of the Total Environment, 979 (2025), 179380]. Corrigendum to "The effect of fire on the carbon fluxes and productivity of Brazilian woodland savannas" [Science of The Total Environment volume 987 (2025) 179626]. Corrigendum to "Woody species with higher hydraulic efficiency or lower photosynthetic capacity discriminate more against 13C at the global scale" [Science of the Total Environment, 908 (2024), 168172]. Corrigendum to "The chemical evolution of tributaries to Lake George (Essex County), New York (USA), 1970-2024: Recovery from acidic atmospheric deposition and the impact of road salt" [Sci. Total Environ., 1015 (2026), 181402]. Corrigendum to "Plant biomass responses to elevated CO2 are mediated by phosphorus uptake" [Science of the Total Environment, 863 (2023), 160775].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1